Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Endoscopy

Endoscopic part-task training box scores correlate with endoscopic outcomes

Authors: Amy Ou, Claire M. Shin, Adam J. Goodman, Michael A. Poles, Violeta B. Popov

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Competency in endoscopy has traditionally been based on number of procedures performed. With movement towards milestone-based accreditation, new standards of establishing competency are required. The Thompson Endoscopic Skills Trainer (TEST) is a training device previously shown to differentiate between novice and expert endoscopists. This study aims to correlate TEST scores to other markers of performance in endoscopy.

Methods

Trainees of a gastroenterology fellowship program were guided through the TEST. Their scores and sub-scores were correlated to their endoscopic metrics of performance, including adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, fentanyl usage, midazolam usage, pain score, overall procedure time, and performance on the ASGE Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy Tool (ACE Tool).

Results

The Overall Score positively correlated with the ACE Tool Total Score (r = 0.707, p = 0.010) and sub-scores (Cognitive Skills Score: r = 0.624, p = 0.030; Motor Skills Score: r = 0.756, p = 0.004), and negatively correlated with cecal intubation time (r = − 0.591, p = 0.043). The Gross Motor Score positively correlated with cecal intubation rate (r = 0.593, p = 0.042), ACE Tool Total Score (r = 0.594, p = 0.042) and Motor Skills Score (r = 0.623, p = 0.031), and negatively correlated with cecal intubation time (r = − 0.695, p = 0.012). The Fine Motor Score positively correlated with the ACE Tool Polypectomy Score (r = 0.601, p = 0.039), and negatively correlated with procedure time (r = − 0.640, p = 0.025), cecal intubation time (r = − 0.645, p = 0.024), and withdrawal time (r = − 0.629, p = 0.028).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that performance on the TEST correlate to endoscopic measures. Given these results, the TEST may be used in conjunction with existing assessment tools for demonstrating competency in endoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel Y, Kim HP, Dibonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(1179–1187):e1171–1173 Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel Y, Kim HP, Dibonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(1179–1187):e1171–1173
2.
go back to reference ASGE Training Committee (2004) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Core Curriculum. ASGE Training Committee (2004) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Core Curriculum.
3.
go back to reference Training Committee ASGE, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, Adler DG, Coyle WJ, DeGregorio B, Dua KS, DiMaio CJ, Lee LS, McHenry L Jr, Pais SA, Rajan E, Faulx AL (2012) Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 76:482–490CrossRef Training Committee ASGE, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, Adler DG, Coyle WJ, DeGregorio B, Dua KS, DiMaio CJ, Lee LS, McHenry L Jr, Pais SA, Rajan E, Faulx AL (2012) Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 76:482–490CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Training Committee ASGE, Adler DG, Bakis G, Coyle WJ, DeGregorio B, Dua KS, Lee LS, McHenry L Jr, Pais SA, Rajan E, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, Faulx AL (2012) Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75:231–235CrossRef Training Committee ASGE, Adler DG, Bakis G, Coyle WJ, DeGregorio B, Dua KS, Lee LS, McHenry L Jr, Pais SA, Rajan E, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, Faulx AL (2012) Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75:231–235CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, Valori R, Ismail T, Dunckley P (2014) An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 63:1746–1754CrossRef Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, Valori R, Ismail T, Dunckley P (2014) An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 63:1746–1754CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eckert LD, Short MW, Domagalski JE, Jaboori KA, Short PA (2009) Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators. J Grad Med Educ 1:89–92CrossRef Eckert LD, Short MW, Domagalski JE, Jaboori KA, Short PA (2009) Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators. J Grad Med Educ 1:89–92CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, Nelligan G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA (2010) Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 71:319–324CrossRef Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, Nelligan G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA (2010) Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 71:319–324CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ (2012) Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol 107:971–975CrossRef Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ (2012) Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol 107:971–975CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Group ACER (2016) Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 83(516–523):e511 Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Group ACER (2016) Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 83(516–523):e511
10.
go back to reference Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC (2012) The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 366:1051–1056CrossRef Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC (2012) The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 366:1051–1056CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Patel SG, Keswani R, Elta G, Saini S, Menard-Katcher P, Del Valle J, Hosford L, Myers A, Ahnen D, Schoenfeld P, Wani S (2015) Status of competency-based medical education in endoscopy training: a Nationwide Survey of US ACGME-accredited gastroenterology training programs. Am J Gastroenterol 110:956–962CrossRef Patel SG, Keswani R, Elta G, Saini S, Menard-Katcher P, Del Valle J, Hosford L, Myers A, Ahnen D, Schoenfeld P, Wani S (2015) Status of competency-based medical education in endoscopy training: a Nationwide Survey of US ACGME-accredited gastroenterology training programs. Am J Gastroenterol 110:956–962CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Training Committee ASGE, Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, Al-Haddad MA, Bakis G, Christie JA, Davila RE, DeGregorio B, DiMaio CJ, Enestvedt BK, Jorgensen J, Mullady DK, Rajan L (2014) ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 79:1–7CrossRef Training Committee ASGE, Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, Al-Haddad MA, Bakis G, Christie JA, Davila RE, DeGregorio B, DiMaio CJ, Enestvedt BK, Jorgensen J, Mullady DK, Rajan L (2014) ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 79:1–7CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Education ACfGM (2018) ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in general surgery. Education ACfGM (2018) ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in general surgery.
14.
go back to reference Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Pedowitz RA, Sweet RM, Feins RH, Deutsch ES, Sachdeva AK (2015) Best practices across surgical specialties relating to simulation-based training. Surgery 158:1395–1402CrossRef Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Pedowitz RA, Sweet RM, Feins RH, Deutsch ES, Sachdeva AK (2015) Best practices across surgical specialties relating to simulation-based training. Surgery 158:1395–1402CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Sevdalis N, Paige J, Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Jones DB, Association for Surgical Education Simulation C (2015) Simulation in surgery: what's needed next? Ann Surg 261:846–853CrossRef Stefanidis D, Sevdalis N, Paige J, Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Jones DB, Association for Surgical Education Simulation C (2015) Simulation in surgery: what's needed next? Ann Surg 261:846–853CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Committee AT, Goodman AJ, Melson J, Aslanian HR, Bhutani MS, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Sethi A, Sullivan SA, Thosani N, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT (2019) Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 90:1–12CrossRef Committee AT, Goodman AJ, Melson J, Aslanian HR, Bhutani MS, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Sethi A, Sullivan SA, Thosani N, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT (2019) Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 90:1–12CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cohen J, Thompson CC (2013) The next generation of endoscopic simulation. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1036–1039CrossRef Cohen J, Thompson CC (2013) The next generation of endoscopic simulation. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1036–1039CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Obstein KL, Patil VD, Jayender J, San-Jose-Estepar R, Spofford IS, Lengyel BI, Vosburgh KG, Thompson CC (2011) Evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels by use of an objective kinematic-based system. Gastrointest Endosc 73:315–321CrossRef Obstein KL, Patil VD, Jayender J, San-Jose-Estepar R, Spofford IS, Lengyel BI, Vosburgh KG, Thompson CC (2011) Evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels by use of an objective kinematic-based system. Gastrointest Endosc 73:315–321CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Downing SM (2003) Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37:830–837CrossRef Downing SM (2003) Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37:830–837CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Ou A, Camacho A, Lengyel B, Ryan MB (2014) Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 46:735–744CrossRef Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Ou A, Camacho A, Lengyel B, Ryan MB (2014) Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 46:735–744CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Thompson CC (2015) Validation of an endoscopic part-task training box as a skill assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc 81:967–973CrossRef Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Thompson CC (2015) Validation of an endoscopic part-task training box as a skill assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc 81:967–973CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic part-task training box scores correlate with endoscopic outcomes
Authors
Amy Ou
Claire M. Shin
Adam J. Goodman
Michael A. Poles
Violeta B. Popov
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07830-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue