Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

01-12-2022 | Nephrectomy | Research article

Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma according to surgeon generation

Authors: Makoto Toguchi, Tsunenori Kondo, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Kazunari Tanabe, Toshio Takagi

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The experience of performing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is associated with better surgical outcomes. However, surgeon’s generation may impact surgical outcomes. We evaluated the perioperative outcomes of RAPN between first- and second-generation surgeons according to the surgeon’s experience.

Methods

This study included 529 patients who underwent RAPN for renal cell carcinoma from January 2013 to November 2018. Four specific surgeons performed the surgery. According to the surgeon’s generation, the patients were divided into two groups: first-generation and second-generation. To reflect the learning curve of RAPN, the surgical outcomes of each case (1–50, 51–100, 101–150) were evaluated between these groups.

Results

Between 1 to 50 cases and 101–150 cases, no significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the two generations. Between 51–100 cases, age at surgery was significantly younger in the first-generation than in the second-generation group (58 years vs. 64 years, p = 0.04). The second-generation group had a shorter operation time in cases 1–50 (169 min vs. 188 min, p = 0.0001), 51–100 (145 min vs. 169 min, p = 0.008), and 101–150 (142 min vs. 165 min, p = 0.009), than the first-generation group. Although shorter WIT and higher trifecta achievement were observed in the second-generation group than in the first-generation group between 1–50 cases, the difference was not noted between 51–100 cases and 101–150 cases.

Conclusion

Patients operated by second-generation surgeons had better surgical outcomes than first-generation surgeons, especially during the early experience period, which might result from their assistance experience, sophisticated surgical procedures refined by the first-generation, and the first-generation surgeon’s introduction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, Palese MA. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS. 2011;15(3):291–7.CrossRef Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, Palese MA. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS. 2011;15(3):291–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology (Ridgewood, NJ). 2011;78(4):813–9.CrossRef Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology (Ridgewood, NJ). 2011;78(4):813–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zeuschner P, Meyer I, Siemer S, Stoeckle M, Wagenpfeil G, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Three different learning curves have an independent impact on perioperative outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(2):1254–61.CrossRef Zeuschner P, Meyer I, Siemer S, Stoeckle M, Wagenpfeil G, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Three different learning curves have an independent impact on perioperative outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(2):1254–61.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182(3):844–53.CrossRef Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182(3):844–53.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(6):982–92.CrossRef Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(6):982–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Takagi T, Kondo T, Yoshida K, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Okumi M, et al. Comparison of kidney function in the early postoperative period in transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between anterior and posterior renal tumors: a propensity score-matched study. J Endourol. 2018;32(2):111–5.CrossRef Takagi T, Kondo T, Yoshida K, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Okumi M, et al. Comparison of kidney function in the early postoperative period in transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between anterior and posterior renal tumors: a propensity score-matched study. J Endourol. 2018;32(2):111–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dagenais J, Bertolo R, Garisto J, Maurice MJ, Mouracade P, Kara O, et al. Variability in partial nephrectomy outcomes: does your surgeon matter? Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):628–34.CrossRef Dagenais J, Bertolo R, Garisto J, Maurice MJ, Mouracade P, Kara O, et al. Variability in partial nephrectomy outcomes: does your surgeon matter? Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):628–34.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meier M, Horton K, John H. Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible? J Robot Surg. 2016;10(4):289–96.CrossRef Meier M, Horton K, John H. Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible? J Robot Surg. 2016;10(4):289–96.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mazzon G, Sridhar A, Busuttil G, Thompson J, Nathan S, Briggs T, et al. Learning curves for robotic surgery: a review of the recent literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(11):89.CrossRef Mazzon G, Sridhar A, Busuttil G, Thompson J, Nathan S, Briggs T, et al. Learning curves for robotic surgery: a review of the recent literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(11):89.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, Sheu EG, Brooks DC, Smink DS. An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4583–96.CrossRef Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, Sheu EG, Brooks DC, Smink DS. An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4583–96.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58(1):127–32.CrossRef Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58(1):127–32.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Larcher A, Muttin F, Peyronnet B, De Naeyer G, Khene Z-E, Dell’Oglio P, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):253–6.CrossRef Larcher A, Muttin F, Peyronnet B, De Naeyer G, Khene Z-E, Dell’Oglio P, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):253–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma according to surgeon generation
Authors
Makoto Toguchi
Tsunenori Kondo
Kazuhiko Yoshida
Kazunari Tanabe
Toshio Takagi
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01654-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue