Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Nephrectomy | Urologic Oncology

Three Different Learning Curves Have an Independent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis

Authors: Philip Zeuschner, MD, Irmengard Meyer, MD, Stefan Siemer, MD, Michael Stoeckle, MD, Gudrun Wagenpfeil, PGD, Stefan Wagenpfeil, PGD, Matthias Saar, MD, Martin Janssen, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become widely accepted, but its different underlying types of learning curves have not been comparatively analyzed to date. This study aimed to determine and compare the impact that the learning curve of the department, the console surgeon, and the bedside assistant as well as patient-related factors has on the perioperative outcomes of RAPN.

Methods

The study retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive transperitoneal RAPNs (2007–2018) performed in a tertiary referral center by 7 surgeons and 37 bedside assistants. Patient characteristics and surgical data were obtained. Experience (EXP) was defined as the current number of RAPNs performed by the department, the surgeon, and the assistant. As the primary outcome, the impact of EXP and patient-related factors on perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared. As the secondary outcome, a cutoff between “experienced” and “inexperienced” was defined. Correlation and regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were performed, with p values lower than 0.05 denoting significance.

Results

The EXP of the department, the surgeon, and the assistant each has a major influence on perioperative outcome in RAPN irrespective of patient-related factors. Perioperative outcomes improve significantly with EXP greater than 100 for the department, EXP greater than 35 for the surgeon, and EXP greater than 15 for the assistant.

Conclusions

The perioperative results of RAPN are influenced by three different types of learning curves including those for the surgical department, the console surgeon, and the assistant. The influence of the bedside assistant clearly has been underestimated to date because it has a significant impact on the perioperative outcomes of RAPN.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:127–32.CrossRef Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:127–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Paulucci DJ, Abaza R, Eun DD, Hemal AK, Badani KK. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: continued refinement of outcomes beyond the initial learning curve. BJU Int. 2017;119:748–54.CrossRef Paulucci DJ, Abaza R, Eun DD, Hemal AK, Badani KK. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: continued refinement of outcomes beyond the initial learning curve. BJU Int. 2017;119:748–54.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hanzly M, Frederick A, Creighton T, et al. Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:297–303.CrossRef Hanzly M, Frederick A, Creighton T, et al. Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:297–303.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Larcher A, De Naeyer G, Turri F, et al. The ERUS curriculum for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: structure definition and pilot clinical validation. Eur Urol. 2019;75:1023–31.CrossRef Larcher A, De Naeyer G, Turri F, et al. The ERUS curriculum for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: structure definition and pilot clinical validation. Eur Urol. 2019;75:1023–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Potretzke AM, Knight BA, Brockman JA, et al. The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter? J Robot Surg. 2016;10:129–34.CrossRef Potretzke AM, Knight BA, Brockman JA, et al. The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter? J Robot Surg. 2016;10:129–34.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mitsinikos E, Abdelsayed GA, Bider Z, et al. Does the level of assistant experience impact operative outcomes for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? J Endourol. 2017;31:38–42.CrossRef Mitsinikos E, Abdelsayed GA, Bider Z, et al. Does the level of assistant experience impact operative outcomes for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? J Endourol. 2017;31:38–42.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786–93.CrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786–93.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Fiori C. Margins, ischaemia, and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics. BJU Int. 2013;112:1125–32.CrossRef Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Fiori C. Margins, ischaemia, and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics. BJU Int. 2013;112:1125–32.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS. “Trifecta” in partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2013;189:36–42.CrossRef Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS. “Trifecta” in partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2013;189:36–42.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leow JJ, Heah NH, Chang SL, Chong YL, Png KS. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 4919 patients. J Urol. 2016;196:1371–7.CrossRef Leow JJ, Heah NH, Chang SL, Chong YL, Png KS. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 4919 patients. J Urol. 2016;196:1371–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67:891–901.CrossRef Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67:891–901.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Larcher A, Muttin F, Peyronnet B, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75:253–6.CrossRef Larcher A, Muttin F, Peyronnet B, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75:253–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kern SQ, Lustik MB, McMann LP, Thibault GP, Sterbis JR. Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Endourol. 2014;28:40–7.CrossRef Kern SQ, Lustik MB, McMann LP, Thibault GP, Sterbis JR. Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Endourol. 2014;28:40–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ruhotina N, Dagenais J, Gandaglia G, et al. The impact of resident involvement in minimally invasive urologic oncology procedures. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:334–40.CrossRef Ruhotina N, Dagenais J, Gandaglia G, et al. The impact of resident involvement in minimally invasive urologic oncology procedures. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:334–40.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Medina LG, Martin O, Cacciamani GE, Ahmadi N, Castro JC, Sotelo R. Needle lost in minimally invasive surgery: management proposal and literature review. J Robot Surg. 2018;12:391–5.CrossRef Medina LG, Martin O, Cacciamani GE, Ahmadi N, Castro JC, Sotelo R. Needle lost in minimally invasive surgery: management proposal and literature review. J Robot Surg. 2018;12:391–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol. 2009;23:115–21.CrossRef Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol. 2009;23:115–21.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nayyar R, Yadav S, Singh P, Dogra PN. Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery. Indian J Urol. 2016;32:204–9.CrossRef Nayyar R, Yadav S, Singh P, Dogra PN. Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery. Indian J Urol. 2016;32:204–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sessa L, Perrenot C, Xu S, et al. Face and content validity of Xperience Team Trainer: bedside assistant training simulator for robotic surgery. Updates Surg. 2018;70:113–9.CrossRef Sessa L, Perrenot C, Xu S, et al. Face and content validity of Xperience Team Trainer: bedside assistant training simulator for robotic surgery. Updates Surg. 2018;70:113–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Thiel DD, Lannen A, Richie E, Dove J, Gajarawala NM, Igel TC. Simulation-based training for bedside assistants can benefit experienced robotic prostatectomy teams. J Endourol. 2013;27:230–7.CrossRef Thiel DD, Lannen A, Richie E, Dove J, Gajarawala NM, Igel TC. Simulation-based training for bedside assistants can benefit experienced robotic prostatectomy teams. J Endourol. 2013;27:230–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171–7.CrossRef Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–80.CrossRef Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–80.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location, and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–53. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location, and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–53.
25.
go back to reference Simmons MN. Morphometric characterization of kidney tumors. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21:99–103.CrossRef Simmons MN. Morphometric characterization of kidney tumors. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21:99–103.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int. 2017;119:456–63. Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int. 2017;119:456–63.
27.
go back to reference Cacciamani GE, Gill T, Medina L, et al. Impact of host factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2018;200:716–30.CrossRef Cacciamani GE, Gill T, Medina L, et al. Impact of host factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2018;200:716–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Three Different Learning Curves Have an Independent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis
Authors
Philip Zeuschner, MD
Irmengard Meyer, MD
Stefan Siemer, MD
Michael Stoeckle, MD
Gudrun Wagenpfeil, PGD
Stefan Wagenpfeil, PGD
Matthias Saar, MD
Martin Janssen, MD
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08856-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021 Go to the issue