Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Urology Reports
Published in: Current Urology Reports 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Urosurgery (P Sooriakumaran, Section Editor)

Learning Curves for Robotic Surgery: a Review of the Recent Literature

Authors: Giorgio Mazzon, Ashwin Sridhar, Gerald Busuttil, James Thompson, Senthil Nathan, Tim Briggs, John Kelly, Greg Shaw

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Use of robot-assisted surgery is increasing since its advent in the 1990s. Robotic surgical training is the subject of much interest. Robotic technology would seem to facilitate training allowing more rapid attainment of competence. The safety and success of a particular surgical team depends on adequacy of training of its members. A learning curve is a way of describing the changes observed in surgical outcomes with increasing experience of the surgeon and can be used to plan training programs. The majority of published papers regarding learning curves are retrospective with small numbers of surgeons with different levels of experience comparing a variety of different outcomes. In this review, we describe the published literature on learning curves in robotic urological surgery, with the aim of offering a guide to both experienced and naïve surgeons who plan to learn new robotic procedure.
Literature
1.
Herrel SD, Smith JA. Robotic –assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology. 2005;66(5 Suppl):105–7.CrossRef
2.
Artibani W, Novara G. Cancer-related outcome and learning curve in retropubic radical prostatectomy: if you need an operation, the most important step is to choose the right surgeon. Eur Urol. 2008;53:874–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
•• Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Kamran A, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2014;114:617–29. This article is a systematic review of learning curve studies within all urological procedures. It includes all the literature published 2011 backword. CrossRefPubMed
4.
Mirheydar HS, Parsons JK. Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health. World J Urol. 2013;31:455–61.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Khan N, Abboudi H, Kamran A, et al. Measuring the surgical learning curve: methods, variables and competency. BJU Int. 2014;113:504–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Wiener S, Haddock P, Shichman S, Dorin R. Construction of a urologic robotic surgery training curriculum: how many simulator sessions are required for residents to achieve proficiency? J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1289–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kang SG, Ryu BJ, Yang KS, Ko YH, Cheon J, et al. An effective repetitive training schedule to achieve skill proficiency using a novel robotic virtual reality simulator. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(3):369–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Meier M, Horton K, John H. Da Vinci Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible? J Robot Surg. 2016;10(4):289–296.
9.
DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:252–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening diagnosis and treatment of clinically localized disease. Eur Urol. 2011;59:61–71.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ahlering TE. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004;1:5–9.CrossRef
12.
Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Catheineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol. 2003;169:1261–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, Onol FF. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:1633–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
O’Malley PJ, Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes DM, Crowe H, Costello AJ. Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience. World J Urol. 2006;24:165–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Gyomber D, Bolton D, Webb D, Harewood L, Crosthwaite A. An analysis of variability of learning curve, margin status and early post operative outcomes in 1200 robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies in a multi-user center. J Urol. 2010;183(4 Suppl. 1):e723.CrossRef
16.
Sooriakumaran P, John M, Leung R, et al. A multi-institutional study of 3794 patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy shows the learning curve is not as short as previously thought. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10:1569–9056.
17.
Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, Tuerk I, Koenig P, Luis M-P, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):475–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Menon M, Tewai A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002;60:864–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;174:369–272.
20.
• Good DW, Steward GD, Laird A, Stolzenburg JU, Cahill D, SA MN. A critical analysis of the learning curve and post-learning curve outcomes of two experience- and volume-matched surgeons for laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:1–9. This article investigates the learning curve for RALP and compared post-learning curve progresses between LRP and RALP. It shows superiority of RALP over LRP once LC achieved, which however does not seem to be significantly shorter. CrossRef
21.
Vasdev N, Bishop C, Kass-lliyya HS, McNicholas TA, Venkat P, Mohan-S G, et al. Developing a robotic prostatectomy service and a robotic fellowship programme-defining the learning curve. Curr Urol. 2013;7:136–44.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lovegrove C, Novara G, Mottrie A, Ahmed K, et al. Structured and modular training pathway for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): validation of the RARP assessment score and learning curve assessment. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):526–35.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Wang L, Diaz M, Stricker H, Peabody JO, Menon M, Rogers CG. Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised? J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):69–74.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Di Pierro GB, Grande P, Wirth JG, Danuser H, Mattei A. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical volume on efficacy and complications in a single-surgeon series. CUAJ. 2015;9(3–4):107–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Hayn MH, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2010;58:197–202.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Richards KA, Kader K, Pettus JA, Smith JJ, Hemal AK. Does initial learning curve compromise outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy? A critical evaluation of the first 60 cases while establishing a robotic program. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1553–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, Schumacher MC, Laurin O, Adding C, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder—what is the effect of the learning curve on outcomes? BJU Int. 2014;113:100–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Y. Abu-Ghanem, Erlich T, Ramon J, Dotan Z, Zilberman DE. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assistant’s seniority has no influence of perioperative course. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(3):305–309.
30.
Lavery HJ, Small AC, Samadi DB, Palese MA. Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. JSLS. 2011;15:291–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology. 2011;78:813–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Jacobsohn KM, Langenstroer P, Waples M, See W. Increasing experience leads to decreased warm ischemia times during robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:A186.
33.
Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:127–33.CrossRefPubMed
34.
• Paulucci DJ, Abaza R, Eun DD, Hemal AK, Badani KK. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: continued refinement of outcomes beyond the initial learning curve. BJU Int. 2016 8. Epub ahead print. Multi-center retrospective study to investigate post-LC outcomes for RAPN. Increasing the number of cases, surgeons are more prone to treat larger tumours minimizing complication, although 50 cases are sufficient to complete the procedure safely.
35.
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182:844–53.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Xie Y, Ma X, Liangyou G, Li H, Lv X, Yu G, et al. Associating the learning curve and tumor anatomical complexity with the margins, ischemia, and complications rate after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Surg. 2016;36:219–24.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2012;62:617–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Learning Curves for Robotic Surgery: a Review of the Recent Literature
Authors
Giorgio Mazzon
Ashwin Sridhar
Gerald Busuttil
James Thompson
Senthil Nathan
Tim Briggs
John Kelly
Greg Shaw
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0738-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Current Urology Reports 11/2017 Go to the issue

Men's Health (A Dabaja, Section Editor)

The State of Men’s Health Services in the Veterans Health Administration

Urosurgery (P Sooriakumaran, Section Editor)

Surgical Techniques for Managing Post-prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction

New Imaging Techniques (S Rais-Bahrami and A George, Section Editors)

Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Management at Initial Staging and Time of Biochemical Recurrence

New Imaging Techniques (S Rais-Bahrami and A George, Section Editors)

Lifetime Radiation Exposure in Patients with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (J Sandhu, Section Editor)

Incidence and Management of De Novo Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

New Imaging Techniques (S Rais-Bahrami and A George, Section Editors)

Characterizing Indeterminate Renal Masses with Molecular Imaging: the Role of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT