Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 4/2022

Open Access 01-04-2022 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Research

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study

Authors: Sibyl Wray, Florian Then Bergh, Annette Wundes, Douglas L. Arnold, Jelena Drulovic, Elzbieta Jasinska, James D. Bowen, Donald Negroski, Robert T. Naismith, Samuel F. Hunter, Mark Gudesblatt, Hailu Chen, Jennifer Lyons, Sai L. Shankar, Shivani Kapadia, Jason P. Mendoza, Barry A. Singer

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF has a safety/efficacy profile similar to DMF but with improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (< 1%) treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events (AEs). Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who switched to DRF from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have not been evaluated.

Methods

EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, 2-year, open-label, phase 3 study of DRF in adults with relapsing–remitting MS. Patients either entered as newly enrolled to DRF trials, or from the 5-week, randomized, head-to-head, phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. This analysis evaluated safety and GI tolerability in patients continuing on DRF (DRF-rollover) or switching from DMF (DMF-rollover) following EVOLVE-MS-2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in a subset of newly enrolled patients who had received prior glatiramer acetate (GA; GA/DRF) or interferons (IFN; IFN/DRF) as their most recent DMT, prior to switching to DRF in EVOLVE-MS-1.

Results

As of September 1, 2020, 1057 patients were enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, including 166, 182, 239, and 225 patients in the GA/DRF, IFN/DRF, DRF-rollover, and DMF-rollover groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was < 1% in all groups. GA/DRF and IFN/DRF patients experienced improvements from baseline in clinical and radiological efficacy outcomes, including significantly reduced annualized relapse rates. Rollover patients had low rates of new or recurrent GI AEs (DRF-rollover, 26.8%/4.2%; DMF-rollover, 27.1%/4.9%).

Conclusion

After 2 years of DRF exposure, patients with prior GA, IFN, or fumarate treatment had safety outcomes consistent with previous fumarate studies. Efficacy in patients with prior GA or IFN treatment was consistent with previous fumarate studies. The data suggest that transition to DRF from GA, IFN, or DMF is a reasonable treatment strategy, with low rates of discontinuation due to GI AEs.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634307).

Infographic

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Salter AR, Tyry T, et al. Treatment discontinuation and disease progression with injectable disease-modifying therapies: findings from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis database. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(4):194–201.CrossRef Fox RJ, Salter AR, Tyry T, et al. Treatment discontinuation and disease progression with injectable disease-modifying therapies: findings from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis database. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(4):194–201.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Havrdova E, et al. Efficacy and safety of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) and other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(4):613–27.CrossRef Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Havrdova E, et al. Efficacy and safety of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) and other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(4):613–27.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N, et al. Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther. 2017;6(1):91–102.CrossRef Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N, et al. Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther. 2017;6(1):91–102.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Daugherty KK, Butler JS, Mattingly M, Ryan M. Factors leading patients to discontinue multiple sclerosis therapies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005;45(3):371–5. Daugherty KK, Butler JS, Mattingly M, Ryan M. Factors leading patients to discontinue multiple sclerosis therapies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005;45(3):371–5.
11.
go back to reference Ontaneda D, Nicholas J, Carraro M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;27:101–11.CrossRef Ontaneda D, Nicholas J, Carraro M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;27:101–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cohan SL, Hendin BA, Reder AT, et al. Interferons and multiple sclerosis: lessons from 25 years of clinical and real-world experience with intramuscular interferon β-1a (Avonex). CNS Drugs. 2021;35(7):743–67.CrossRef Cohan SL, Hendin BA, Reder AT, et al. Interferons and multiple sclerosis: lessons from 25 years of clinical and real-world experience with intramuscular interferon β-1a (Avonex). CNS Drugs. 2021;35(7):743–67.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Phillips JT, Selmaj K, Gold R, et al. Clinical significance of gastrointestinal and flushing events in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate. Int J MS Care. 2015;17(5):236–43.CrossRef Phillips JT, Selmaj K, Gold R, et al. Clinical significance of gastrointestinal and flushing events in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate. Int J MS Care. 2015;17(5):236–43.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Phillips JT, Agrella S, Fox RJ. Dimethyl fumarate: a review of efficacy and practical management strategies for common adverse events in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2017;19(2):74–83.CrossRef Phillips JT, Agrella S, Fox RJ. Dimethyl fumarate: a review of efficacy and practical management strategies for common adverse events in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2017;19(2):74–83.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Naismith RT, Wolinsky JS, Wundes A, et al. Diroximel fumarate (DRF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: interim safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study. Mult Scler. 2020;26(13):1729–39.CrossRef Naismith RT, Wolinsky JS, Wundes A, et al. Diroximel fumarate (DRF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: interim safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study. Mult Scler. 2020;26(13):1729–39.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1098–107.CrossRef Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1098–107.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1087–97.CrossRef Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1087–97.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gold R, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, et al. Safety and efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 9 years’ follow-up. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286420915005.PubMedPubMedCentral Gold R, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, et al. Safety and efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 9 years’ follow-up. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286420915005.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Berger T, Brochet B, Brambilla L, et al. Effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on patient-reported outcomes and clinical measures in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in a real-world clinical setting: PROTEC. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019;5(4):2055217319887191.PubMedPubMedCentral Berger T, Brochet B, Brambilla L, et al. Effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on patient-reported outcomes and clinical measures in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in a real-world clinical setting: PROTEC. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019;5(4):2055217319887191.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Kresa-Reahl K, Repovic P, Robertson D, Okwuokenye M, Meltzer L, Mendoza JP. Effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis switching from glatiramer acetate: RESPOND, a prospective observational study. Clin Ther. 2018;40(12):2077–87.CrossRef Kresa-Reahl K, Repovic P, Robertson D, Okwuokenye M, Meltzer L, Mendoza JP. Effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis switching from glatiramer acetate: RESPOND, a prospective observational study. Clin Ther. 2018;40(12):2077–87.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Naismith RT, Wundes A, Ziemssen T, et al. Diroximel fumarate demonstrates an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study. CNS Drugs. 2020;34(2):185–96.CrossRef Naismith RT, Wundes A, Ziemssen T, et al. Diroximel fumarate demonstrates an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study. CNS Drugs. 2020;34(2):185–96.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Chan A, Gold R, et al. Characterizing absolute lymphocyte count profiles in dimethyl fumarate-treated patients with MS: patient management considerations. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016;6(3):220–9.CrossRef Fox RJ, Chan A, Gold R, et al. Characterizing absolute lymphocyte count profiles in dimethyl fumarate-treated patients with MS: patient management considerations. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016;6(3):220–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.CrossRef Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mehta D, Miller C, Arnold DL, et al. Effect of dimethyl fumarate on lymphocytes in RRMS: implications for clinical practice. Neurology. 2019;92(15):e1724–38.CrossRef Mehta D, Miller C, Arnold DL, et al. Effect of dimethyl fumarate on lymphocytes in RRMS: implications for clinical practice. Neurology. 2019;92(15):e1724–38.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Repovic P, Robertson D, Kresa-Reahl K, et al. Effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis switching after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate, including patients with early multiple sclerosis: subgroup analysis of RESPOND. Neurol Ther. 2021;10(1):169–82. Repovic P, Robertson D, Kresa-Reahl K, et al. Effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis switching after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate, including patients with early multiple sclerosis: subgroup analysis of RESPOND. Neurol Ther. 2021;10(1):169–82.
28.
go back to reference von Hehn C, Howard J, Liu S, et al. Immune response to vaccines is maintained in patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(1): e409.CrossRef von Hehn C, Howard J, Liu S, et al. Immune response to vaccines is maintained in patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(1): e409.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Reder AT, Centonze D, Naylor ML, et al. COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis: associations with disease-modifying therapies. CNS Drugs. 2021;35(3):317–30.CrossRef Reder AT, Centonze D, Naylor ML, et al. COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis: associations with disease-modifying therapies. CNS Drugs. 2021;35(3):317–30.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sormani MP, De Rossi N, Schiavetti I, et al. Disease-modifying therapies and coronavirus disease 2019 severity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(4):780–9.CrossRef Sormani MP, De Rossi N, Schiavetti I, et al. Disease-modifying therapies and coronavirus disease 2019 severity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(4):780–9.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Salter A, Fox RJ, Newsome SD, et al. Outcomes and risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a North American registry of patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(6):699–708.CrossRef Salter A, Fox RJ, Newsome SD, et al. Outcomes and risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a North American registry of patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(6):699–708.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Havrdova E, Giovannoni G, Gold R, et al. Effect of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on no evidence of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: integrated analysis of the phase III DEFINE and CONFIRM studies. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(5):726–33.CrossRef Havrdova E, Giovannoni G, Gold R, et al. Effect of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on no evidence of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: integrated analysis of the phase III DEFINE and CONFIRM studies. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(5):726–33.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mallucci G, Annovazzi P, Miante S, et al. Two-year real-life efficacy, tolerability and safety of dimethyl fumarate in an Italian multicentre study. J Neurol. 2018;265(8):1850–9.CrossRef Mallucci G, Annovazzi P, Miante S, et al. Two-year real-life efficacy, tolerability and safety of dimethyl fumarate in an Italian multicentre study. J Neurol. 2018;265(8):1850–9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference De Stefano N, Stromillo ML, Giorgio A, et al. Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(1):93–9.PubMed De Stefano N, Stromillo ML, Giorgio A, et al. Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(1):93–9.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Jongen PJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-modifying drugs. CNS Drugs. 2017;31(7):585–602.CrossRef Jongen PJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-modifying drugs. CNS Drugs. 2017;31(7):585–602.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wundes A, Wray S, Gold R, et al. Improved gastrointestinal profile with diroximel fumarate is associated with a positive impact on quality of life compared with dimethyl fumarate: results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021;14:1756286421993999.CrossRef Wundes A, Wray S, Gold R, et al. Improved gastrointestinal profile with diroximel fumarate is associated with a positive impact on quality of life compared with dimethyl fumarate: results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021;14:1756286421993999.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study
Authors
Sibyl Wray
Florian Then Bergh
Annette Wundes
Douglas L. Arnold
Jelena Drulovic
Elzbieta Jasinska
James D. Bowen
Donald Negroski
Robert T. Naismith
Samuel F. Hunter
Mark Gudesblatt
Hailu Chen
Jennifer Lyons
Sai L. Shankar
Shivani Kapadia
Jason P. Mendoza
Barry A. Singer
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02068-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Advances in Therapy 4/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine