Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2018

01-02-2018

Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Authors: Avinash R. Kambadakone, Atif Zaheer, Ott Le, Priya Bhosale, Jeffrey Meier, Alexander R. Guimaraes, Zarine Shah, David M. Hough, Lorenzo Mannelli, Erik Soloff, Arnold Friedman, Eric Tamm

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment.

Methods

In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports.

Results

The response rate was 89.6% (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4%). While 86% of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5% used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77%) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83%), improved uniformity (100%), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2%). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5%), lack of interest (52.5%), and complexity of existing templates (47.5%). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7% (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC.

Conclusion

Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, et al. (2008) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 12(4):701–706CrossRefPubMed Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, et al. (2008) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 12(4):701–706CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, et al. (2012) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery 152(3 Suppl 1):S43–S49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, et al. (2012) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery 152(3 Suppl 1):S43–S49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 10(9):1199–1210 (Discussion 210–211)CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 10(9):1199–1210 (Discussion 210–211)CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ben-Josef E, Shields AF, Vaishampayan U, et al. (2004) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):454–459CrossRefPubMed Ben-Josef E, Shields AF, Vaishampayan U, et al. (2004) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):454–459CrossRefPubMed
5.
7.
go back to reference Ko AH, Quivey JM, Venook AP, et al. (2007) A phase II study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus low-dose cisplatin followed by consolidative chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(3):809–816CrossRefPubMed Ko AH, Quivey JM, Venook AP, et al. (2007) A phase II study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus low-dose cisplatin followed by consolidative chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(3):809–816CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association. Gastroenterology 146(1):291.e1–304.e1CrossRef Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association. Gastroenterology 146(1):291.e1–304.e1CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tirkes T, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K (2012) MR imaging techniques for pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 50(3):379–393CrossRefPubMed Tirkes T, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K (2012) MR imaging techniques for pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 50(3):379–393CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bashir MR, Gupta RT (2012) MDCT evaluation of the pancreas: nuts and bolts. Radiol Clin North Am 50(3):365–377CrossRefPubMed Bashir MR, Gupta RT (2012) MDCT evaluation of the pancreas: nuts and bolts. Radiol Clin North Am 50(3):365–377CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference O’Neill E, Hammond N, Miller FH (2014) MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 52(4):757–777CrossRefPubMed O’Neill E, Hammond N, Miller FH (2014) MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 52(4):757–777CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Granata V, Fusco R, Catalano O, et al. (2016) Multidetector computer tomography in the pancreatic adenocarcinoma assessment: an update. Infect Agent Cancer 11:57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Granata V, Fusco R, Catalano O, et al. (2016) Multidetector computer tomography in the pancreatic adenocarcinoma assessment: an update. Infect Agent Cancer 11:57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Pietryga JA, Morgan DE (2015) Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(4):343–357PubMedPubMedCentral Pietryga JA, Morgan DE (2015) Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(4):343–357PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270(1):248–260CrossRefPubMed Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270(1):248–260CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, et al. (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274(2):464–472CrossRefPubMed Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, et al. (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274(2):464–472CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Marcal LP, Fox PS, Evans DB, et al. (2015) Analysis of free-form radiology dictations for completeness and clarity for pancreatic cancer staging. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2391–2397CrossRefPubMed Marcal LP, Fox PS, Evans DB, et al. (2015) Analysis of free-form radiology dictations for completeness and clarity for pancreatic cancer staging. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2391–2397CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. (2017) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15(8):1028–1061CrossRefPubMed Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. (2017) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15(8):1028–1061CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Anderson TJT, Lu N, Brook OR (2017) Disease-specific report templates for your practice. J Am Coll Radiol 14(8):1055–1057CrossRefPubMed Anderson TJT, Lu N, Brook OR (2017) Disease-specific report templates for your practice. J Am Coll Radiol 14(8):1055–1057CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Powell DK, Silberzweig JE (2015) State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey. Acad Radiol 22(2):226–233CrossRefPubMed Powell DK, Silberzweig JE (2015) State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey. Acad Radiol 22(2):226–233CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267(1):240–250CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267(1):240–250CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260(1):174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260(1):174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Kahn CE Jr, Heilbrun ME, Applegate KE (2013) From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 10(4):268–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kahn CE Jr, Heilbrun ME, Applegate KE (2013) From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 10(4):268–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253(1):74–80CrossRefPubMed Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253(1):74–80CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B (2010) Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506CrossRefPubMed Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B (2010) Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Goel M, Arya S (2012) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature. HPB 14(10):658–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Goel M, Arya S (2012) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature. HPB 14(10):658–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Brugel M, Link TM, Rummeny EJ, et al. (2004) Assessment of vascular invasion in pancreatic head cancer with multislice spiral CT: value of multiplanar reconstructions. Eur Radiol 14(7):1188–1195CrossRefPubMed Brugel M, Link TM, Rummeny EJ, et al. (2004) Assessment of vascular invasion in pancreatic head cancer with multislice spiral CT: value of multiplanar reconstructions. Eur Radiol 14(7):1188–1195CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Brugel M, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M (2004) Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: value of multislice helical CT. Abdom Imaging 29(2):239–245CrossRefPubMed Brugel M, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M (2004) Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: value of multislice helical CT. Abdom Imaging 29(2):239–245CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Zhao WY, Luo M, Sun YW, et al. (2009) Computed tomography in diagnosing vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 8(5):457–464PubMed Zhao WY, Luo M, Sun YW, et al. (2009) Computed tomography in diagnosing vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 8(5):457–464PubMed
30.
go back to reference Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224(3):764–768CrossRefPubMed Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224(3):764–768CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bellini D, Gupta S, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, et al. (2017) Use of a noise optimized monoenergetic algorithm for patient-size independent selection of an optimal energy level during dual-energy CT of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41(1):39–47CrossRefPubMed Bellini D, Gupta S, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, et al. (2017) Use of a noise optimized monoenergetic algorithm for patient-size independent selection of an optimal energy level during dual-energy CT of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41(1):39–47CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Gupta S, Wagner-Bartak N, Jensen CT, et al. (2016) Dual-energy CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: reproducibility of primary tumor measurements and assessment of tumor conspicuity and margin sharpness. Abdom Radiol 41(7):1317–1324CrossRef Gupta S, Wagner-Bartak N, Jensen CT, et al. (2016) Dual-energy CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: reproducibility of primary tumor measurements and assessment of tumor conspicuity and margin sharpness. Abdom Radiol 41(7):1317–1324CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bhosale P, Le O, Balachandran A, et al. (2015) Quantitative and qualitative comparison of single-source dual-energy computed tomography and 120-kVp computed tomography for the assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39(6):907–913CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhosale P, Le O, Balachandran A, et al. (2015) Quantitative and qualitative comparison of single-source dual-energy computed tomography and 120-kVp computed tomography for the assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39(6):907–913CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Frellesen C, Fessler F, Hardie AD, et al. (2015) Dual-energy CT of the pancreas: improved carcinoma-to-pancreas contrast with a noise-optimized monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm. Eur J Radiol 84(11):2052–2058CrossRefPubMed Frellesen C, Fessler F, Hardie AD, et al. (2015) Dual-energy CT of the pancreas: improved carcinoma-to-pancreas contrast with a noise-optimized monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm. Eur J Radiol 84(11):2052–2058CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Yin Q, Zou X, Zai X, et al. (2015) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic mass-forming pancreatitis: differentiation with dual-energy MDCT in spectral imaging mode. Eur J Radiol 84(12):2470–2476CrossRefPubMed Yin Q, Zou X, Zai X, et al. (2015) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic mass-forming pancreatitis: differentiation with dual-energy MDCT in spectral imaging mode. Eur J Radiol 84(12):2470–2476CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
go back to reference Birchard KR, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB, et al. (2005) Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. AJR 185(3):700–703CrossRefPubMed Birchard KR, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB, et al. (2005) Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. AJR 185(3):700–703CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppanen MP, et al. (2009) A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 250(6):957–963CrossRefPubMed Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppanen MP, et al. (2009) A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 250(6):957–963CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Sahani DV, Bonaffini PA, Catalano OA, Guimaraes AR, Blake MA (2012) State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. Radiographics 32(4):1133–1158 (Discussion 58–60)CrossRefPubMed Sahani DV, Bonaffini PA, Catalano OA, Guimaraes AR, Blake MA (2012) State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. Radiographics 32(4):1133–1158 (Discussion 58–60)CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Scialpi M, Scaglione M, Volterrani L, et al. (2005) Imaging evaluation of post pancreatic surgery. Eur J Radiol 53(3):417–424CrossRefPubMed Scialpi M, Scaglione M, Volterrani L, et al. (2005) Imaging evaluation of post pancreatic surgery. Eur J Radiol 53(3):417–424CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Authors
Avinash R. Kambadakone
Atif Zaheer
Ott Le
Priya Bhosale
Jeffrey Meier
Alexander R. Guimaraes
Zarine Shah
David M. Hough
Lorenzo Mannelli
Erik Soloff
Arnold Friedman
Eric Tamm
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1433-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Abdominal Radiology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.