Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2018

01-02-2018

Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Authors: Sampanna Rayamajhi, Aparna Balachandran, Mathew Katz, Arun Reddy, Eric Rohren, Priya Bhosale

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The roles of different cross-sectional imaging in evaluating the recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are not well established. We evaluated the utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma in conjunction with the tumor marker CA 19-9.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent CECT and FDG PET/CT along with serum CA 19-9 measurement as a follow-up or on a clinical suspicion of recurrent disease after initial surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two observers blinded to the other imaging modality results retrospectively reviewed and interpreted the images in consensus using a three-point scale (negative, equivocal, or positive). Pathologic analysis by biopsy or further clinical and radiologic follow-up determined the true status of the suspected recurrences. The imaging results were compared with CA 19-9 levels and true disease status.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Thirty-three patients (85%) had proven recurrent cancer and six patients (15%) had no evidence of disease. Twenty-four patients had elevated CA 19-9 and 15 patients had normal CA 19-9. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for recurrence were 90.9%, 100.0%, and 92.3% for PET/CT and 72.2%, 66.6%, and 71.7% for CECT, respectively. Sensitivity for locoregional recurrence was 94.4% for PET/CT but only 61.1% for CECT. PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients who had normal levels of CA 19-9. PET/CT showed lesions not visible on CECT in five (15%) patients. Although the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were higher than those of CECT, they were not statistically significant (p = 0.489 and p = 0.1489, respectively).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT has a high sensitivity for pancreatic cancer recurrence. Normal CA 19-9 does not necessarily exclude these recurrences. FDG PET/CT is useful when CECT is equivocal and can detect recurrence in patients with normal CA 19-9.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA 60:277–300PubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA 60:277–300PubMed
2.
go back to reference Barugola G, Falconi M, Bettini R, et al. (2007) The determinant factors of recurrence following resection for ductal pancreatic cancer. JOP 8:132–140PubMed Barugola G, Falconi M, Bettini R, et al. (2007) The determinant factors of recurrence following resection for ductal pancreatic cancer. JOP 8:132–140PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 21:195–200CrossRefPubMed Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 21:195–200CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:384–391CrossRefPubMed Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:384–391CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Strobel O, Hartwig W, Hackert T, et al. (2013) Re-resection for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20:964–972CrossRefPubMed Strobel O, Hartwig W, Hackert T, et al. (2013) Re-resection for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20:964–972CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miyazaki M, Yoshitomi H, Shimizu H, et al. (2014) Repeat pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal cancer recurrence in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatectomy: is it worthwhile? Surgery 155:58–66CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki M, Yoshitomi H, Shimizu H, et al. (2014) Repeat pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal cancer recurrence in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatectomy: is it worthwhile? Surgery 155:58–66CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Thomas RM, Truty MJ, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, et al. (2012) Selective reoperation for locally recurrent or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following primary pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1696–1704CrossRefPubMed Thomas RM, Truty MJ, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, et al. (2012) Selective reoperation for locally recurrent or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following primary pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1696–1704CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilkowski R, Thoma M, Bruns C, Duhmke E, Heinemann V (2006) Combined chemoradiotherapy for isolated local recurrence after primary resection of pancreatic cancer. JOP 7:34–40PubMed Wilkowski R, Thoma M, Bruns C, Duhmke E, Heinemann V (2006) Combined chemoradiotherapy for isolated local recurrence after primary resection of pancreatic cancer. JOP 7:34–40PubMed
9.
go back to reference Habermehl D, Brecht IC, Bergmann F, et al. (2013) Chemoradiation in patients with isolated recurrent pancreatic cancer—therapeutical efficacy and probability of re-resection. Radiat Oncol 8:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habermehl D, Brecht IC, Bergmann F, et al. (2013) Chemoradiation in patients with isolated recurrent pancreatic cancer—therapeutical efficacy and probability of re-resection. Radiat Oncol 8:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Horiuchi H, Uchida S, Hisaka T, et al. (2005) A study of recurrent pancreatic cancer with metastatic liver tumors after pancreatectomy. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer Chemother 32:1685–1687 Horiuchi H, Uchida S, Hisaka T, et al. (2005) A study of recurrent pancreatic cancer with metastatic liver tumors after pancreatectomy. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer Chemother 32:1685–1687
11.
go back to reference Safi F, Roscher R, Beger HG (1989) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9. Hepatogastroenterology 36:419–423PubMed Safi F, Roscher R, Beger HG (1989) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9. Hepatogastroenterology 36:419–423PubMed
12.
go back to reference Park JK, Paik WH, Ryu JK, et al. (2013) Clinical significance and revisiting the meaning of CA 19-9 blood level before and after the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 1,446 patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort in a single institution. PLoS ONE 8:e78977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JK, Paik WH, Ryu JK, et al. (2013) Clinical significance and revisiting the meaning of CA 19-9 blood level before and after the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 1,446 patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort in a single institution. PLoS ONE 8:e78977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2010) Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1490–1498CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2010) Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1490–1498CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed
15.
go back to reference Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, et al. (1997) Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 4:551–556CrossRefPubMed Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, et al. (1997) Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 4:551–556CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood RA (1998) The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem 35(Pt 1):99–103CrossRefPubMed Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood RA (1998) The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem 35(Pt 1):99–103CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Parra JL, Kaplan S, Barkin JS (2005) Elevated CA 19-9 caused by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: review of the benign causes of increased CA 19-9 level. Dig Dis Sci 50:694–695CrossRefPubMed Parra JL, Kaplan S, Barkin JS (2005) Elevated CA 19-9 caused by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: review of the benign causes of increased CA 19-9 level. Dig Dis Sci 50:694–695CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Osswald BR, Klee FE, Wysocki S (1993) The reliability of highly elevated CA 19-9 levels. Dis Mark 11:275–278CrossRef Osswald BR, Klee FE, Wysocki S (1993) The reliability of highly elevated CA 19-9 levels. Dis Mark 11:275–278CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kannagi R (2007) Carbohydrate antigen sialyl Lewis a—its pathophysiological significance and induction mechanism in cancer progression. Chang Gung Med J 30:189–209PubMed Kannagi R (2007) Carbohydrate antigen sialyl Lewis a—its pathophysiological significance and induction mechanism in cancer progression. Chang Gung Med J 30:189–209PubMed
22.
go back to reference Malesci A, Tommasini MA, Bonato C, et al. (1987) Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 92:60–67CrossRefPubMed Malesci A, Tommasini MA, Bonato C, et al. (1987) Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 92:60–67CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5313–5327CrossRefPubMed Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5313–5327CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tong Y, Song Z, Zhu W (2013) Study of an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration in a large health check-up cohort in China. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed Tong Y, Song Z, Zhu W (2013) Study of an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration in a large health check-up cohort in China. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Waanders E, van Keimpema L, Brouwer JT, et al. (2009) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is extremely elevated in polycystic liver disease. Liver Int 29:1389–1395CrossRefPubMed Waanders E, van Keimpema L, Brouwer JT, et al. (2009) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is extremely elevated in polycystic liver disease. Liver Int 29:1389–1395CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E (2012) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402CrossRefPubMed Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E (2012) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gade M, Kubik M, Fisker RV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Petersen LJ (2015) Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA. Cancer Imaging 15:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gade M, Kubik M, Fisker RV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Petersen LJ (2015) Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA. Cancer Imaging 15:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Wei W, et al. (2010) Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:936–944CrossRefPubMed Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Wei W, et al. (2010) Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:936–944CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, et al. (2007) Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 70:331–338PubMed Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, et al. (2007) Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 70:331–338PubMed
31.
go back to reference Sperti C, Pasquali C, Bissoli S, et al. (2010) Tumor relapse after pancreatic cancer resection is detected earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT. J Gastrointest Surg 14:131–140CrossRefPubMed Sperti C, Pasquali C, Bissoli S, et al. (2010) Tumor relapse after pancreatic cancer resection is detected earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT. J Gastrointest Surg 14:131–140CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, et al. (2006) Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg 10:511–518CrossRefPubMed Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, et al. (2006) Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg 10:511–518CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ruf J, Hanninen EL, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5:266–272CrossRefPubMed Ruf J, Hanninen EL, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5:266–272CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. (2010) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Mol Imaging Biol 12:452–459CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. (2010) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Mol Imaging Biol 12:452–459CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Menke-Pluymers MB, Klinkenbijl JH, Tjioe M, Jeekel J (1992) Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Hepato Gastroenterol 39:429–432 Menke-Pluymers MB, Klinkenbijl JH, Tjioe M, Jeekel J (1992) Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Hepato Gastroenterol 39:429–432
Metadata
Title
Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Authors
Sampanna Rayamajhi
Aparna Balachandran
Mathew Katz
Arun Reddy
Eric Rohren
Priya Bhosale
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1316-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Abdominal Radiology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.