Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Technical Report

Modified technique for imaging the wrist and elbow in obese and claustrophobic patients using a non-open standard MRI scanner

Authors: Nishant Gupta, Ian Karol, Yogesh Kumar, Brian Rapillo, Neetu Soni, Daichi Hayashi

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

It is challenging to image extremely obese and claustrophobic patients using a standard, non-open, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. On the other hand, installing an additional upright or open MRI scanner may not be cost-effective for most practices. Our technique with a patient in a sitting or standing position behind the standard MRI scanner may be helpful in the MR examination of the wrist/elbow in these patients using a standard wrist/elbow coil.

Material and methods

We performed wrist and elbow MRI of extremely obese and claustrophobic patients by using our modified technique with the patient sitting or standing outside the standard non-open MRI scanner. A total number of 20 cases with the following diagnosis were examined: triquetral and scaphoid bone contusions and fractures, scapholunate ligament tears, triangular fibrocartilage complex tear, and biceps tear.

Results

Comparison of image quality for diagnostic information between the standard technique and our technique showed no significant difference, which is necessary for making the diagnosis.

Conclusions

Our technique enables wrist and elbow imaging of extremely obese and claustrophobic patients who cannot otherwise be imaged using a standard MRI scanner without compromising the image quality that is essential for making a diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Enders J, Zimmermann E, Rief M, Martus P, Klingebiel R, Asbach P, et al. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the “CLAUSTRO” randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Imaging. 2011;11:4:1–15. Enders J, Zimmermann E, Rief M, Martus P, Klingebiel R, Asbach P, et al. Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the “CLAUSTRO” randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Imaging. 2011;11:4:1–15.
2.
go back to reference Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1322–7.CrossRefPubMed Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF. Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1322–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Munn Z, Jordan Z. Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013;11:265–74.CrossRefPubMed Munn Z, Jordan Z. Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013;11:265–74.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rothschild PA, Domesek JM, Eastham ME, Kaufman L. MR imaging of excessively obese patients: the use of an open permanent magnet. Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;9:151–4.CrossRefPubMed Rothschild PA, Domesek JM, Eastham ME, Kaufman L. MR imaging of excessively obese patients: the use of an open permanent magnet. Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;9:151–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Buckley O, Ward E, Ryan A, Colin W, Snow A, Torreggiani WC. European obesity and the radiology department. What can we do to help? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:298–309.CrossRefPubMed Buckley O, Ward E, Ryan A, Colin W, Snow A, Torreggiani WC. European obesity and the radiology department. What can we do to help? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:298–309.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Merl T, Scholz M, Gerhardt P, Langer M, Laubenberger J, Weiss HD, et al. Results of a prospective multicenter study for evaluation of the diagnostic quality of an open whole-body low-field MRI unit. A comparison with high-field MRI measured by the applicable gold standard. Eur J Radiol. 1999;30:43–53.CrossRefPubMed Merl T, Scholz M, Gerhardt P, Langer M, Laubenberger J, Weiss HD, et al. Results of a prospective multicenter study for evaluation of the diagnostic quality of an open whole-body low-field MRI unit. A comparison with high-field MRI measured by the applicable gold standard. Eur J Radiol. 1999;30:43–53.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hailey D. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006:(92)1–4. Hailey D. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006:(92)1–4.
9.
go back to reference Hunt CH, Wood CP, Lane JI, Bolster BD, Bernstein MA, Witte RJ. Wide, short bore magnetic resonance at 1.5 T: reducing the failure rate in claustrophobic patients. Clin Neuroradiol. 2011;21:141–4.CrossRefPubMed Hunt CH, Wood CP, Lane JI, Bolster BD, Bernstein MA, Witte RJ. Wide, short bore magnetic resonance at 1.5 T: reducing the failure rate in claustrophobic patients. Clin Neuroradiol. 2011;21:141–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Heuck A, Bonél H, Huber A, Müller-Lisse GU, Sittek H, Reiser M. Akzeptanz von Hochfeld-Ganzkörper-MR-Geräten, offenem MR-System und dediziertem Extremitätenscanner durch die Patienten. Radiologe. 1997;37:778–84.CrossRefPubMed Heuck A, Bonél H, Huber A, Müller-Lisse GU, Sittek H, Reiser M. Akzeptanz von Hochfeld-Ganzkörper-MR-Geräten, offenem MR-System und dediziertem Extremitätenscanner durch die Patienten. Radiologe. 1997;37:778–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bangard C, Paszek J, Berg F, Eyl G, Kessler J, Lackner K, et al. MR imaging of claustrophobic patients in an open 1.0T scanner: motion artifacts and patient acceptability compared with closed bore magnets. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:152–7.CrossRefPubMed Bangard C, Paszek J, Berg F, Eyl G, Kessler J, Lackner K, et al. MR imaging of claustrophobic patients in an open 1.0T scanner: motion artifacts and patient acceptability compared with closed bore magnets. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:152–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dantendorfer K, Wimberger D, Katschnig H, Imhoff H. Claustrophobia in MRI scanners. Lancet. 1991;338:761–2.CrossRefPubMed Dantendorfer K, Wimberger D, Katschnig H, Imhoff H. Claustrophobia in MRI scanners. Lancet. 1991;338:761–2.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Modified technique for imaging the wrist and elbow in obese and claustrophobic patients using a non-open standard MRI scanner
Authors
Nishant Gupta
Ian Karol
Yogesh Kumar
Brian Rapillo
Neetu Soni
Daichi Hayashi
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2988-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Skeletal Radiology 4/2019 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Worsening right hip pain