Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry

Authors: Masato Nakamura, Masakazu Yamagishi, Takafumi Ueno, Kazuhiro Hara, Sugao Ishiwata, Tomonori Itoh, Ichiro Hamanaka, Tetsuzo Wakatsuki, Teruyasu Sugano, Kazuya Kawai, Takashi Akasaka, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Takeshi Kimura

Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The impact of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) on clinical decision-making remains unclear in daily practice. The CVIT-DEFER registry is a prospective multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients with angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis for whom FFR measurement is clinically indicated. The treatment strategy determined from angiographic findings alone and the strategy selected after FFR measurement were compared. Data on the treatment strategy were obtained for 3093 subjects. The average age of these subjects was 69.5 ± 10.2 years and 73.8 % were men. The majority had stable coronary artery disease, including 60.4 % with stable angina pectoris. The treatment strategy based on angiographic findings was medical management in 34.5 %, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 63.5 %, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 2.1 %. The FFR was ≤0.8 in 1566 lesions (42.2 %). After FFR measurement, medical treatment was changed to revascularization in 19.7 %, while PCI was switched to medical treatment in 57.4 % at the lesion level. As a result, reclassification of the treatment strategy at the patient level was done in 39.0 % of the patients. Revascularization was frequently switched to medical treatment after FFR measurement. These findings support the clinical utility of employing FFR data to guide selection of PCI.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–91.PubMedCrossRef Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–91.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation. 1997;95:2037–43.PubMedCrossRef Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation. 1997;95:2037–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.PubMedCrossRef Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.PubMedCrossRef Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224.
9.
go back to reference Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.PubMedCrossRef Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–2111. Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–2111.
12.
go back to reference Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.PubMedCrossRef Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.PubMedCrossRef De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference The BARI. 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2503–15.CrossRef The BARI. 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2503–15.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, PHD, Kim YT, Yun SC, Song H, Lee JY, Kim WJ, MD, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Mintz GS, Park SW. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, PHD, Kim YT, Yun SC, Song H, Lee JY, Kim WJ, MD, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Mintz GS, Park SW. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36.
17.
go back to reference Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, van’t Veer M, J. Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, van’t Veer M, J. Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21.
18.
go back to reference Belle EV, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, et al. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography insights from a large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry. Circulation. 2014;129:173–85. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006646. Belle EV, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, et al. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography insights from a large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry. Circulation. 2014;129:173–85. doi:10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​113.​006646.
Metadata
Title
Modification of treatment strategy after FFR measurement: CVIT-DEFER registry
Authors
Masato Nakamura
Masakazu Yamagishi
Takafumi Ueno
Kazuhiro Hara
Sugao Ishiwata
Tomonori Itoh
Ichiro Hamanaka
Tetsuzo Wakatsuki
Teruyasu Sugano
Kazuya Kawai
Takashi Akasaka
Nobuhiro Tanaka
Takeshi Kimura
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1868-4300
Electronic ISSN: 1868-4297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0266-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2015 Go to the issue