Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 12/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Research

Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy with Incision Skin Tissue Retractor vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study of the Management of Child Acute Appendicitis

Authors: Xian-Ling Li, Qin-Ming Zhang, Wei-Ping Zhang, Ting-Ting Liu

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This study aims to compare the clinical effects of an incision skin tissue retractor for mini-incision open appendectomy and laparoscopic surgery for pediatric appendicitis.

Methods

From January 2014 to July 2017, a total of 248 patients were included in the present study. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed for 108 cases (LA group), and mini-incision open appendectomy with an incision skin tissue retractor was performed for 140 cases (MOA-ISTR group). Then, medical history, age, gender, operative duration, amount of bleeding during the operation, the determination of whether or not the appendix was perforated during the operation, hospitalization days, total cost of hospitalization, and complications after the operation (incision infection or intestinal obstruction) were compared. The SPSS 20.0 software package was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in history, age, gender, perioperative perforation of the appendix, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications (incisional infection or intestinal obstruction, P  > 0.05). However, the values for duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss and total hospitalization expense were smaller, when compared with the LA group (P  < 0.05).

Conclusion

Mini-incision open appendectomy with an incision skin tissue retractor has similar efficacy and incision appearance when compared with laparoscopic appendectomy. Furthermore, this approach leads to shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss and less hospitalization time, and is more convenient, especially for perforated appendicitis. Moreover, it can be widely used for pediatric appendicitis, and is more suitable for doctors who are not skilled in basic hospitals and laparoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Svensson JF. Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:449–53.CrossRef Svensson JF. Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:449–53.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43.CrossRef McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ure BM, Spangenberger W, Hebebrand D, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in children and adolescents with suspected appendicitis: results of medical technology assessment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1992;2:336–40.CrossRef Ure BM, Spangenberger W, Hebebrand D, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in children and adolescents with suspected appendicitis: results of medical technology assessment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1992;2:336–40.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference GilchristB F, Lobe TE, Schropp KP, et al. Is there a role for laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery? J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27:209–12.CrossRef GilchristB F, Lobe TE, Schropp KP, et al. Is there a role for laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery? J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27:209–12.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kamal M, Qureshi KH. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Pak J Med Res. 2003;42:23–6. Kamal M, Qureshi KH. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Pak J Med Res. 2003;42:23–6.
7.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopicversus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–48.PubMedPubMedCentral Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopicversus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439–48.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1193–5.CrossRef Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1193–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:289–95.CrossRef Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:289–95.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pirro N, Berdah SV. Appendicitis: yes or no to laparoscopic approach? J Chir. 2006;143:155–9.CrossRef Pirro N, Berdah SV. Appendicitis: yes or no to laparoscopic approach? J Chir. 2006;143:155–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Çiftçi F. Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy. World J Gastroinest Surg. 2015;7(10):267–72.CrossRef Çiftçi F. Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy. World J Gastroinest Surg. 2015;7(10):267–72.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, Khan M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:236–40.CrossRef Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, Khan M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:236–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ali R, Khan MR, Pishori T, Tayeb M. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is this a feasible option for developing countries? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:25–9.CrossRef Ali R, Khan MR, Pishori T, Tayeb M. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is this a feasible option for developing countries? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:25–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peiser HG, Greenberg D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:91–4.PubMed Peiser HG, Greenberg D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:91–4.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Synder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–8.CrossRef Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Synder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Malik AM, Talpur AH, Laghari AA. Video assisted laparoscopic extracorporeal appendectomy versus open appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:355–9.CrossRef Malik AM, Talpur AH, Laghari AA. Video assisted laparoscopic extracorporeal appendectomy versus open appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:355–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M. A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1023–8.CrossRef Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M. A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1023–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. World J Surg. 2012;36(3):573–8.CrossRef Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. World J Surg. 2012;36(3):573–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(4):236–40.CrossRef Khalil J, Muqim R, Rafique M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(4):236–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McGrath B, Buckius MT, Grim R, et al. Economics of appendicitis: cost trend analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy from 1998 to 2008. J Surg Res. 2011;171(2):e161–8.CrossRef McGrath B, Buckius MT, Grim R, et al. Economics of appendicitis: cost trend analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy from 1998 to 2008. J Surg Res. 2011;171(2):e161–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Svensson JF, et al. Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:449–53.CrossRef Svensson JF, et al. Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:449–53.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1174–80.CrossRef Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1174–80.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kumar B, Samad A, Khanzada TA, Laghari MH, Shaikh AR. Superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy: the Hyderabad experience. Rawal Med J. 2008;33:165–8. Kumar B, Samad A, Khanzada TA, Laghari MH, Shaikh AR. Superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy: the Hyderabad experience. Rawal Med J. 2008;33:165–8.
24.
go back to reference Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–14.CrossRef Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–14.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference McKinlay R, Neeleman S, Klein R, Stevens K, Greenfield J, Ghory M, et al. Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:730–3.CrossRef McKinlay R, Neeleman S, Klein R, Stevens K, Greenfield J, Ghory M, et al. Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:730–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy with Incision Skin Tissue Retractor vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study of the Management of Child Acute Appendicitis
Authors
Xian-Ling Li
Qin-Ming Zhang
Wei-Ping Zhang
Ting-Ting Liu
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0829-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Advances in Therapy 12/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.