Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original article

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: A randomized prospective study

Authors: S. Olmi, S. Magnone, A. Bertolini, E. Croce

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background:

Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure, as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. It seems to be more effective than the corresponding open procedure. Aim of this study is to evaluate a group of patients randomly allocated either to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) or to open appendectomy (OA).

Methods:

From January 1998 to December 2002, 252 consecutive and nonselected patients, 155 women and 97 men, were randomized either to LA or OA. Recorded data were operative time, postoperative length, of stay and complications.

Results:

Mean operative time was 45 min (range 30–120) for OA and 36 min (25–60) for LA, mean postoperative stay was 5.5 days (4–12) for OA and 3.4 days (2–8) for LA. Complication occurred in 20 patients (14.5%) for OA and in four patients (2.6%) for LA.

Conclusion:

We believe that LA is effective in any kind of clinical situation, with low traumatic impact and best comfort for the patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Attwood SEA, Hill AD, Murphe PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112(3): 497–501PubMed Attwood SEA, Hill AD, Murphe PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112(3): 497–501PubMed
2.
go back to reference Engstrom L, Fenyo G (1985) Appendectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation; a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 27: 971–972 Engstrom L, Fenyo G (1985) Appendectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation; a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 27: 971–972
3.
go back to reference Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 23: 835–845CrossRefPubMed Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 23: 835–845CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report on 388 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9CrossRefPubMed Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report on 388 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Simplified appendectomy without stump embedding. Experiences of 20 years conventional and 5 years laparoscopic application. Chirurg 69: 66–70CrossRefPubMed Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Simplified appendectomy without stump embedding. Experiences of 20 years conventional and 5 years laparoscopic application. Chirurg 69: 66–70CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Huang MT, Wel PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ (2001) Needlescopic, laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 306–312CrossRefPubMed Huang MT, Wel PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ (2001) Needlescopic, laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 306–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Loh A, Taylor RS (1992) Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg 27: 289–290 Loh A, Taylor RS (1992) Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg 27: 289–290
8.
go back to reference Mc Anena O J, Austin O, O’Connel PR, Hederman WP, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick J (1992) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective evaluation. Br J Surg 79: 818–820PubMed Mc Anena O J, Austin O, O’Connel PR, Hederman WP, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick J (1992) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective evaluation. Br J Surg 79: 818–820PubMed
9.
go back to reference Nowzaradan Y, Westmoreland JC, Mc Carver CT, Harris RJ (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use. Laparosc Surg 1(5): 247–257 Nowzaradan Y, Westmoreland JC, Mc Carver CT, Harris RJ (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use. Laparosc Surg 1(5): 247–257
10.
go back to reference Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 8–13PubMed Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 8–13PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library; Issue 4. Chichester, UK: Wiley Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library; Issue 4. Chichester, UK: Wiley
12.
go back to reference Schreiber JH (1987) Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women. Surg Endosc 1: 211–216CrossRefPubMed Schreiber JH (1987) Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women. Surg Endosc 1: 211–216CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Valla JS, Limmone B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 166–172PubMed Valla JS, Limmone B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 166–172PubMed
15.
go back to reference van der Broek WT, Bijnen AB, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88: 251–254CrossRefPubMed van der Broek WT, Bijnen AB, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88: 251–254CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: A randomized prospective study
Authors
S. Olmi
S. Magnone
A. Bertolini
E. Croce
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2165-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2005 Go to the issue