Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2017

01-03-2017

MDCT assessment of resectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Qihong Ni, Haolu Wang, Yunhe Zhang, Lijun Qian, Jiachang Chi, Xiaowen Liang, Tao Chen, Jian Wang

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) assessment of resectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and to identify the factors associated with unresectability and accurate evaluation of resectability.

Methods

From January 2007 to June 2015, a total of 77 consecutive patients were included. All patients had preoperative MDCT (with MPR and MinIP) and surgical treatment, and were pathologically proven with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The MDCT images were reviewed retrospectively by two senior radiologists and one hepatobiliary surgeon. The surgical findings and pathologic results were considered to be the gold standard. The Chi square test was used to identify factors associated with unresectability and accurate evaluation of resectability.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of MDCT assessment were 83.3 %, 75.9 %, and 80.5 %, respectively. The main causes of inaccuracy were incorrect evaluation of N2 lymph node metastasis (4/15) and distant metastasis (4/15). Bismuth type IV tumor, main or bilateral hepatic artery involvement, and main or bilateral portal vein involvement were highly associated with unresectability (P < 0.001). Patients without biliary drainage had higher accuracy of MDCT evaluation of resectability compared to those with biliary drainage (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

MDCT is reliable for preoperative assessment of resectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Bismuth type IV tumor and main or bilateral vascular involvement highly suggest the unresectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients without biliary drainage have a more accurate MDCT evaluation of resectability. We suggest MDCT should be performed before biliary drainage to achieve an accurate evaluation of resectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aljiffry M, Walsh MJ, Molinari M (2009) Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009. World J Gastroenterol 15:4240–4262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aljiffry M, Walsh MJ, Molinari M (2009) Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009. World J Gastroenterol 15:4240–4262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Marsh RW, Alonzo M, Bajaj S, et al. (2012) Comprehensive review of the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancer 2012. Part II: multidisciplinary management. J Surg Oncol 106:339–345. doi:10.1002/jso.23027 CrossRef Marsh RW, Alonzo M, Bajaj S, et al. (2012) Comprehensive review of the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancer 2012. Part II: multidisciplinary management. J Surg Oncol 106:339–345. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​23027 CrossRef
8.
12.
go back to reference Chen HW, Lai EC, Pan AZ, et al. (2009) Preoperative assessment and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with 16-multidetector computed tomography cholangiography and angiography. Hepatogastroenterology 56:578–583PubMed Chen HW, Lai EC, Pan AZ, et al. (2009) Preoperative assessment and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with 16-multidetector computed tomography cholangiography and angiography. Hepatogastroenterology 56:578–583PubMed
14.
go back to reference Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, et al. (2002) Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics 22:173–187CrossRefPubMed Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, et al. (2002) Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics 22:173–187CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Park HS, Lee JM, Choi JY, et al. (2008) Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:396–405. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2310 CrossRefPubMed Park HS, Lee JM, Choi JY, et al. (2008) Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:396–405. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​07.​2310 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J (1997) Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1439–1443. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168704 CrossRefPubMed Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J (1997) Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1439–1443. doi:10.​2214/​ajr.​168.​6.​9168704 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Masselli G, Manfredi R, Vecchioli A, Gualdi G (2008) MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2213–2221. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1004-z CrossRefPubMed Masselli G, Manfredi R, Vecchioli A, Gualdi G (2008) MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2213–2221. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-008-1004-z CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Denecke T, Degutyte E, Stelter L, et al. (2006) Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP. Eur Radiol 16:1719–1726. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0172-y CrossRefPubMed Denecke T, Degutyte E, Stelter L, et al. (2006) Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP. Eur Radiol 16:1719–1726. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-006-0172-y CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MDCT assessment of resectability in hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Qihong Ni
Haolu Wang
Yunhe Zhang
Lijun Qian
Jiachang Chi
Xiaowen Liang
Tao Chen
Jian Wang
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0943-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Abdominal Radiology 3/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.