Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP

Authors: Timm Denecke, Erika Degutyte, Lars Stelter, Lukas Lehmkuhl, Ray Valencia, Enrique Lopez-Hänninen, Roland Felix, Christian Stroszczynski

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective was the evaluation of minimum intensity projections (MinIP) of 16-channel multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data for the visualization of biliary ducts with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as reference method. Twenty-five patients with biliary obstruction who received MDCT of the abdomen and MRCP without subsequent interventions were analysed. Coronal and axial MinIP were reconstructed from the MDCT-data. The evaluation of image quality and the quantitative comparison to MRCP was performed by two observers in consensus. The additional diagnostic value of MinIP compared with conventionally visualised MDCT was assessed by three independent observers. With MRCP as the reference method, MinIP was superior to conventional MDCT concerning the visualization of the extent of bile duct dilatation (r, 1.000 vs 0.699) and the correlation of diameter measurement (r, 0.979 vs 0.942). Subsidiary to conventional MDCT, MinIP revealed an improvement of visualization of the biliary system in 73% of cases. Concerning the additional diagnostic value, MinIP allowed for a better definition of the obstruction site in 13% of patients, and in one patient a change of diagnosis was observed. Thus, MinIP can improve the diagnostic assessment of biliary obstructions in MDCT imaging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stroszczynski C, Hunerbein M (2005) Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 30(3):314–323CrossRefPubMed Stroszczynski C, Hunerbein M (2005) Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 30(3):314–323CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy (2002) NIH Consens State Sci Statements 19(1):1–26 NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy (2002) NIH Consens State Sci Statements 19(1):1–26
3.
go back to reference Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29(3):182–187PubMedCrossRef Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29(3):182–187PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ, Bouchier H (2004) A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 8(10):iii,1–89 Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough T, Walters SJ, Bouchier H (2004) A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess 8(10):iii,1–89
5.
go back to reference Hanninen EL, Ricke J, Amthauer H, Rottgen R, Bohmig M, Langrehr J, Pech M, Denecke T, Rosewicz S, Felix R (2005) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: image quality, ductal morphology, and value of additional T2- and T1-weighted sequences for the assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer. Acta Radiol 46(2):117–125PubMedCrossRef Hanninen EL, Ricke J, Amthauer H, Rottgen R, Bohmig M, Langrehr J, Pech M, Denecke T, Rosewicz S, Felix R (2005) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: image quality, ductal morphology, and value of additional T2- and T1-weighted sequences for the assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer. Acta Radiol 46(2):117–125PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hanninen EL, Pech M, Jonas S, Ricke J, Thelen A, Langrehr J, Hintze R, Rottgen R, Denecke T, Winter L, Neuhaus P, Felix R (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for tumor localization and therapy planning in malignant hilar obstructions. Acta Radiol 46(5):462–470CrossRefPubMed Hanninen EL, Pech M, Jonas S, Ricke J, Thelen A, Langrehr J, Hintze R, Rottgen R, Denecke T, Winter L, Neuhaus P, Felix R (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for tumor localization and therapy planning in malignant hilar obstructions. Acta Radiol 46(5):462–470CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Ulmer C, Handke T, Felix R, Schlag PM (2003) Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):853–858CrossRefPubMed Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Ulmer C, Handke T, Felix R, Schlag PM (2003) Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):853–858CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Klein HM, Wein B, Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Gunther RW (1993) Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing. Br J Radiol 66(789):762–767PubMed Klein HM, Wein B, Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Gunther RW (1993) Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing. Br J Radiol 66(789):762–767PubMed
9.
go back to reference Gillams A, Gardener J, Richards R, Tan AC, Linney A, Lees WR (1994) Three-dimensional computed tomography cholangiography: a new technique for biliary tract imaging. Br J Radiol 67(797):445–448PubMedCrossRef Gillams A, Gardener J, Richards R, Tan AC, Linney A, Lees WR (1994) Three-dimensional computed tomography cholangiography: a new technique for biliary tract imaging. Br J Radiol 67(797):445–448PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Kopecky KK (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 192(3):675–680PubMed Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Kopecky KK (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 192(3):675–680PubMed
11.
go back to reference Soto JA, Velez SM, Guzman J (1999) Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(4):943–948PubMed Soto JA, Velez SM, Guzman J (1999) Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(4):943–948PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stabile Ianora AA, Memeo M, Scardapane A, Rotondo A, Angelelli G (2003) Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications. Eur Radiol 13(4):867–873PubMed Stabile Ianora AA, Memeo M, Scardapane A, Rotondo A, Angelelli G (2003) Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications. Eur Radiol 13(4):867–873PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gibson RN, Vincent JM, Speer T, Collier NA, Noack K (2004) Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol 15(8):1634–1642CrossRefPubMed Gibson RN, Vincent JM, Speer T, Collier NA, Noack K (2004) Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol 15(8):1634–1642CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Eracleous E, Genagritis M, Papanikolaou N, Kontou AM, Prassopoullos P, Chrysikopoulos H, Allan P, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) Complementary role of helical CT cholangiography to MR cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary function and kinetics. Eur Radiol 15(10):2130–2139CrossRefPubMed Eracleous E, Genagritis M, Papanikolaou N, Kontou AM, Prassopoullos P, Chrysikopoulos H, Allan P, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) Complementary role of helical CT cholangiography to MR cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary function and kinetics. Eur Radiol 15(10):2130–2139CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Okada M, Fukada J, Toya K, Ito R, Ohashi T, Yorozu A (2005) The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol 15(10):2140–2145CrossRefPubMed Okada M, Fukada J, Toya K, Ito R, Ohashi T, Yorozu A (2005) The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol 15(10):2140–2145CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Raptopoulos V, Prassopoulos P, Chuttani R, McNicholas MM, McKee JD, Kressel HY (1998) Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections. Radiology 207(2):317–324PubMed Raptopoulos V, Prassopoulos P, Chuttani R, McNicholas MM, McKee JD, Kressel HY (1998) Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections. Radiology 207(2):317–324PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim HC, Park SJ, Park SI, Park SH, Kim HJ, Shin HC, Bae WK, Kim IY, Lee HK (2005) Multislice CT cholangiography using thin-slab minimum intensity projection and multiplanar reformation in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary obstruction: preliminary experience. Clin Imaging 29(1):46–54PubMed Kim HC, Park SJ, Park SI, Park SH, Kim HJ, Shin HC, Bae WK, Kim IY, Lee HK (2005) Multislice CT cholangiography using thin-slab minimum intensity projection and multiplanar reformation in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary obstruction: preliminary experience. Clin Imaging 29(1):46–54PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rao ND, Gulati MS, Paul SB, Pande GK, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2005) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in gallbladder carcinoma patients with obstructive jaundice: comparison with magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(2):304–308CrossRefPubMed Rao ND, Gulati MS, Paul SB, Pande GK, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2005) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in gallbladder carcinoma patients with obstructive jaundice: comparison with magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(2):304–308CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zandrino F, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, Ferrando R, Reggiani G, Musante F (2002) Multislice CT cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and initial clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol 12(5):1155–1161CrossRefPubMed Zandrino F, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, Ferrando R, Reggiani G, Musante F (2002) Multislice CT cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and initial clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol 12(5):1155–1161CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zandrino F, Curone P, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, Musante F (2005) MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract. Abdom Imaging 30(1):77–85CrossRefPubMed Zandrino F, Curone P, Benzi L, Ferretti ML, Musante F (2005) MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract. Abdom Imaging 30(1):77–85CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Xu AM, Cheng HY, Jiang WB, Chen D, Jia YC, Wu MC (2002) Multi-slice three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography: a new technique for diagnosis of biliary diseases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 1(4):595–603PubMed Xu AM, Cheng HY, Jiang WB, Chen D, Jia YC, Wu MC (2002) Multi-slice three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography: a new technique for diagnosis of biliary diseases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 1(4):595–603PubMed
22.
go back to reference Park SJ, Han JK, Kim TK, Choi BI (2001) Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 26(3):281–286CrossRefPubMed Park SJ, Han JK, Kim TK, Choi BI (2001) Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 26(3):281–286CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hanninen EL, Denecke T, Stelter L, Pech M, Podrabsky P, Pratschke J, Ricke J, Schindler R, Neuhaus P, Felix R, Tullius SG (2005) Preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors using multirow detector computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative findings. Transpl Int 18(10):1134–1141CrossRefPubMed Hanninen EL, Denecke T, Stelter L, Pech M, Podrabsky P, Pratschke J, Ricke J, Schindler R, Neuhaus P, Felix R, Tullius SG (2005) Preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors using multirow detector computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative findings. Transpl Int 18(10):1134–1141CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP
Authors
Timm Denecke
Erika Degutyte
Lars Stelter
Lukas Lehmkuhl
Ray Valencia
Enrique Lopez-Hänninen
Roland Felix
Christian Stroszczynski
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0172-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

European Radiology 8/2006 Go to the issue