Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Mastectomy | Study protocol

Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robotic Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES): a prospective cohort study of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) and Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG)

Authors: Jai Min Ryu, Jeea Lee, Jeeyeon Lee, BeomSeok Ko, Joo Heung Kim, Hyukjai Shin, Hyung Seok Park, Korea Robot-endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG)

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) has emerged as a new treatment option for breast cancer and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for women who have a high risk of pathogenic variants. Even though several studies have reported that RNSM is a feasible procedure, some argue that it should only be performed by specialized surgeons, and data on oncologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are limited. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration and several surgeons warned that robotic breast surgery should be performed only by specialized surgeons and recommended that the benefits, risks, and alternatives of all available treatment options be discussed with patients so they can make informed treatment decisions. The Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) has been established to evaluate, standardize, and teach this state-of-the-art procedure. We have designed a multicenter prospective cohort study entitled Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robot Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES) to report surgical, PRO, and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

MARRES is a multi-institution cohort study prospectively collecting data from patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction. The patient inclusion criteria are adult women older than 19 with breast cancer or a high risk of breast cancer (patients with BRCA1/2, TP53, PALB2 mutations, etc.), who have scheduled therapeutic or RRM and want immediate reconstruction. Surgical outcomes, including pre- and postoperative photos, oncologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and PRO, are collected. The primary endpoints are postoperative complication rates within 30 postoperative days and the Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications within 180 postoperative days. The secondary endpoints are 5-year postoperative recurrence-free survival and cancer incidence rate (for those who underwent RRM), patient satisfaction with reconstruction expectations preoperative (baseline) and results within 6 to 12 postoperative months, surgeon satisfaction with postoperative results in 6 postoperative months, and cost-effectiveness of the definitive surgery. Patient recruitment will be completed in April 2025, and the target number of enrolled patients is 2000.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence about the surgical outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and patient satisfaction with RNSM and endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), compared with conventional NSM.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04585074. Registered April 8, 2020.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53.CrossRefPubMed Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, Van De Sijpe KA, Daems KK, Monstrey SJ, Van Belle SJ. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(5):462–70.CrossRefPubMed Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, Van De Sijpe KA, Daems KK, Monstrey SJ, Van Belle SJ. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(5):462–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reefy S, Patani N, Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Osman H, Mokbel K. Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reefy S, Patani N, Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Osman H, Mokbel K. Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mota BS, Riera R, Ricci MD, Barrett J, de Castria TB, Atallah AN, Bevilacqua JL: Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD008932. Mota BS, Riera R, Ricci MD, Barrett J, de Castria TB, Atallah AN, Bevilacqua JL: Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD008932.
5.
go back to reference Agha RA, Al Omran Y, Wellstead G, Sagoo H, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Orgill DP, Rusby JE. Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open. 2019;3(2):135–45.CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Al Omran Y, Wellstead G, Sagoo H, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Orgill DP, Rusby JE. Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open. 2019;3(2):135–45.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Alsharif E, Ryu JM, Choi HJ, Nam SJ, Kim SW, Yu J, Chae BJ, Lee SK, Lee JE: Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less than 2.0 cm. J Breast Cancer. 2019;22(4):613–623. Alsharif E, Ryu JM, Choi HJ, Nam SJ, Kim SW, Yu J, Chae BJ, Lee SK, Lee JE: Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less than 2.0 cm. J Breast Cancer. 2019;22(4):613–623.
7.
go back to reference Weber WP, Haug M, Kurzeder C, Bjelic-Radisic V, Koller R, Reitsamer R, Fitzal F, Biazus J, Brenelli F, Urban C, et al. Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;172(3):523–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weber WP, Haug M, Kurzeder C, Bjelic-Radisic V, Koller R, Reitsamer R, Fitzal F, Biazus J, Brenelli F, Urban C, et al. Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;172(3):523–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Corso G, De Lorenzi F, Vicini E, Pagani G, Veronesi P, Sargenti M, Magnoni F, Naninato P, Maisonneuve P, Sangalli C et al: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with different approaches: surgical incisions, complications, and cosmetic results. Preliminary results of 100 consecutive patients at a single center. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(12):1751–1760. Corso G, De Lorenzi F, Vicini E, Pagani G, Veronesi P, Sargenti M, Magnoni F, Naninato P, Maisonneuve P, Sangalli C et al: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with different approaches: surgical incisions, complications, and cosmetic results. Preliminary results of 100 consecutive patients at a single center. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(12):1751–1760.
9.
go back to reference Lanthaler M, Spinelli R, Tasch C, Sieb M, Harfmann M, Nitto A, Pierer G, Bauer T. Influence of Incision Site on Postoperative Outcome in Skin-/Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Difference between Radial and Inframammary Incision? Breast Care (Basel). 2020;15(3):265–71.CrossRefPubMed Lanthaler M, Spinelli R, Tasch C, Sieb M, Harfmann M, Nitto A, Pierer G, Bauer T. Influence of Incision Site on Postoperative Outcome in Skin-/Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Difference between Radial and Inframammary Incision? Breast Care (Basel). 2020;15(3):265–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Park S, Yoon C, Bae SJ, Cha C, Kim D, Lee J, Ahn SG, Roh TS, Kim YS, Jeong J. Comparison of complications according to incision types in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2020;53:85–91.CrossRefPubMed Park S, Yoon C, Bae SJ, Cha C, Kim D, Lee J, Ahn SG, Roh TS, Kim YS, Jeong J. Comparison of complications according to incision types in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2020;53:85–91.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sakamoto N, Fukuma E, Higa K, Ozaki S, Sakamoto M, Abe S, Kurihara T, Tozaki M. Early results of an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010;1(3):232–9.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto N, Fukuma E, Higa K, Ozaki S, Sakamoto M, Abe S, Kurihara T, Tozaki M. Early results of an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010;1(3):232–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Friedlander LD, Sundin J, Bakshandeh N. Endoscopy mastectomy and breast reconstruction: endoscopic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19(1):27–9.CrossRefPubMed Friedlander LD, Sundin J, Bakshandeh N. Endoscopy mastectomy and breast reconstruction: endoscopic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19(1):27–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mok CW, Lai HW. Endoscopic-assisted surgery in the management of breast cancer: 20 years review of trend, techniques and outcomes. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2019;46:144–56.CrossRefPubMed Mok CW, Lai HW. Endoscopic-assisted surgery in the management of breast cancer: 20 years review of trend, techniques and outcomes. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2019;46:144–56.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF: Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(4):558–560. Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF: Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(4):558–560.
15.
go back to reference Park HS, Kim JH, Lee DW, Song SY, Park S, Kim SI, Ryu DH, Cho YU. Gasless Robot-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Case Report. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(3):334–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park HS, Kim JH, Lee DW, Song SY, Park S, Kim SI, Ryu DH, Cho YU. Gasless Robot-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Case Report. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(3):334–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Angarita FA, Castelo M, Englesakis M, McCready DR, Cil TD. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: systematic review. Br J Surg. 2020;107(12):1580–94.PubMed Angarita FA, Castelo M, Englesakis M, McCready DR, Cil TD. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: systematic review. Br J Surg. 2020;107(12):1580–94.PubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Jackson RS, Sanders T, Park A, Buras R, Liang W, Harris C, Mylander C, Rosman M, Holton L, Singh D, et al. Prospective Study Comparing Surgeons’ Pain and Fatigue Associated with Nipple-Sparing versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):3024–31.CrossRefPubMed Jackson RS, Sanders T, Park A, Buras R, Liang W, Harris C, Mylander C, Rosman M, Holton L, Singh D, et al. Prospective Study Comparing Surgeons’ Pain and Fatigue Associated with Nipple-Sparing versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):3024–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ryu JM, Kim JY, Choi HJ, Ko B, Kim J, Cho J, et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea robot-endoscopy minimal access breast surgery study group (KoREa-BSG). Ann Surg. 2022;275(5):985–91. Ryu JM, Kim JY, Choi HJ, Ko B, Kim J, Cho J, et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea robot-endoscopy minimal access breast surgery study group (KoREa-BSG). Ann Surg. 2022;275(5):985–91.
20.
go back to reference Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:676–82.CrossRefPubMed Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;30:676–82.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, Davies CJ, Holliday HW, Elston CW. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71(6):469–72.CrossRefPubMed Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blamey RW, Davies CJ, Holliday HW, Elston CW. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71(6):469–72.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(4):328–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(4):328–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Lemasurier P, Guihard T, Cothier-Savay I, Reyal F. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):969–84.CrossRefPubMed Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Lemasurier P, Guihard T, Cothier-Savay I, Reyal F. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):969–84.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Stanec Z, Žic R, Budi S, Stanec S, Milanović R, Vlajčić Z, Roje Z, Rudman F, Martić K, Held R, et al. Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(5):485–91.CrossRefPubMed Stanec Z, Žic R, Budi S, Stanec S, Milanović R, Vlajčić Z, Roje Z, Rudman F, Martić K, Held R, et al. Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(5):485–91.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Chung IY, Kim JS, Lee SB, Son BH, Eom JS, Kim SB, Gong GY, et al. Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Nipple-Areola Complex After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(11):1030–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Chung IY, Kim JS, Lee SB, Son BH, Eom JS, Kim SB, Gong GY, et al. Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Nipple-Areola Complex After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(11):1030–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):461–8.CrossRefPubMed Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):461–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):143–8.CrossRefPubMed Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):143–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):446–50.CrossRefPubMed Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, Gasgarth R, Carlson GW. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):446–50.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sherman KA, Woon S, French J, Elder E. Body image and psychological distress in nipple-sparing mastectomy: the roles of self-compassion and appearance investment. Psychooncology. 2017;26(3):337–45.CrossRefPubMed Sherman KA, Woon S, French J, Elder E. Body image and psychological distress in nipple-sparing mastectomy: the roles of self-compassion and appearance investment. Psychooncology. 2017;26(3):337–45.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(5):704–14.CrossRefPubMed Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(5):704–14.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Eaves FF, 3rd, Bostwick J, 3rd, Nahai F, Murray DR, Styblo TM, Carlson GW: Endoscopic techniques in aesthetic breast surgery. Augmentation, mastectomy, biopsy, capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, reduction, mastopexy, and reconstructive techniques. Clin Plastic Surg. 1995;22(4):683–695. Eaves FF, 3rd, Bostwick J, 3rd, Nahai F, Murray DR, Styblo TM, Carlson GW: Endoscopic techniques in aesthetic breast surgery. Augmentation, mastectomy, biopsy, capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, reduction, mastopexy, and reconstructive techniques. Clin Plastic Surg. 1995;22(4):683–695.
33.
go back to reference Yamashita K, Shimizu K: Endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery: procedures and short-term results. J Nippon Med Sch. 2006;73(4):193–202. Yamashita K, Shimizu K: Endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery: procedures and short-term results. J Nippon Med Sch. 2006;73(4):193–202.
34.
go back to reference Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan AC. Endoscopic-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate mammary prosthesis reconstruction for early breast cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(2):302–6.CrossRefPubMed Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan AC. Endoscopic-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate mammary prosthesis reconstruction for early breast cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(2):302–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kitamura K, Ishida M, Inoue H, Kinoshita J, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Early results of an endoscope-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Surgery. 2002;131(1 Suppl):S324-329.CrossRefPubMed Kitamura K, Ishida M, Inoue H, Kinoshita J, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Early results of an endoscope-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer. Surgery. 2002;131(1 Suppl):S324-329.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lai HW, Wu HS, Chuang KL, Chen DR, Chang TW, Kuo SJ, Chen ST, Kuo YL. Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) Flap Reconstruction: Preliminary Results of 48 Patients. Surg Innov. 2015;22(4):382–9.CrossRefPubMed Lai HW, Wu HS, Chuang KL, Chen DR, Chang TW, Kuo SJ, Chen ST, Kuo YL. Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) Flap Reconstruction: Preliminary Results of 48 Patients. Surg Innov. 2015;22(4):382–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kuo YL, Chang CH, Chang TY, Chien HF, Liao LM, Hung CS, Lin SL, Chen ST, Chen DR, Lai HW. Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy with and without Immediate Reconstruction: An Extended Follow-Up Multicenter Study. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2021;147(2):267–78.CrossRef Kuo YL, Chang CH, Chang TY, Chien HF, Liao LM, Hung CS, Lin SL, Chen ST, Chen DR, Lai HW. Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy with and without Immediate Reconstruction: An Extended Follow-Up Multicenter Study. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2021;147(2):267–78.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lee HY, Chang YW, Yu DY, Lee TY, Kim DW, Kim WY, Jung SP, Woo SU, Lee JB, Son GS. Comparison of Single Incision Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Based on Initial Experience. J Breast Cancer. 2021;24(2):196–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee HY, Chang YW, Yu DY, Lee TY, Kim DW, Kim WY, Jung SP, Woo SU, Lee JB, Son GS. Comparison of Single Incision Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Based on Initial Experience. J Breast Cancer. 2021;24(2):196–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Rathat G, Herlin C, Bonnel C, Captier G, Duraes M. Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:1812–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rathat G, Herlin C, Bonnel C, Captier G, Duraes M. Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:1812–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
41.
go back to reference Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim JY, Park S, Kim SI. Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Front Oncol. 2020;10: 594388.CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim JY, Park S, Kim SI. Post-Operative Complications and Nipple Necrosis Rates Between Conventional and Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Front Oncol. 2020;10: 594388.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G, Girardi A, Peradze N, Lissidini G, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Manconi A, Gottardi A, et al. Update on the Feasibility and Progress on Robotic Breast Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3046–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G, Girardi A, Peradze N, Lissidini G, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Manconi A, Gottardi A, et al. Update on the Feasibility and Progress on Robotic Breast Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3046–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Sanson C, Roulot A, Honart JF, Rimareix F, Leymarie N, Sarfati B: Robotic Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A prospective Study of 138 Procedures. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). 2021; 116(2):135–142. Sanson C, Roulot A, Honart JF, Rimareix F, Leymarie N, Sarfati B: Robotic Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A prospective Study of 138 Procedures. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). 2021; 116(2):135–142.
44.
go back to reference Lai HW, Chen ST, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(8):1514–25.CrossRefPubMed Lai HW, Chen ST, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(8):1514–25.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Houvenaeghel G, Barrou J, Jauffret C, Rua S, Sabiani L, Van Troy A, Buttarelli M, Blache G, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, et al. Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 637049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Houvenaeghel G, Barrou J, Jauffret C, Rua S, Sabiani L, Van Troy A, Buttarelli M, Blache G, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, et al. Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 637049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Loh ZJ, Wu TY, Cheng FT. Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):e279–84.CrossRefPubMed Loh ZJ, Wu TY, Cheng FT. Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):e279–84.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Huang YT, Chueh LF, Lee JT, Tsai HP, Chen SC. Robot-assisted Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Autologous Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction: Techniques and Feasibility in Three Different Breast Cancer Surgical Scenarios. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(1):e1–8.CrossRefPubMed Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Huang YT, Chueh LF, Lee JT, Tsai HP, Chen SC. Robot-assisted Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Autologous Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction: Techniques and Feasibility in Three Different Breast Cancer Surgical Scenarios. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(1):e1–8.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Park HS, Lee J, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim SI, Cho YU. Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Initial Experience. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park HS, Lee J, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Kim SI, Cho YU. Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Initial Experience. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Lai HW, Toesca A, Sarfati B, Park HS, Houvenaeghel G, Selber JC, Cheng FT, Kuo WL, Peradze N, Song SY, et al. Consensus Statement on Robotic Mastectomy-Expert Panel From International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019. Ann Surg. 2020;271(6):1005–12.CrossRefPubMed Lai HW, Toesca A, Sarfati B, Park HS, Houvenaeghel G, Selber JC, Cheng FT, Kuo WL, Peradze N, Song SY, et al. Consensus Statement on Robotic Mastectomy-Expert Panel From International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019. Ann Surg. 2020;271(6):1005–12.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2017;31:51–6.CrossRefPubMed Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2017;31:51–6.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Shin H. Current Trends in and Indications for Endoscopy-Assisted Breast Surgery for Breast Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1187:567–90.CrossRefPubMed Shin H. Current Trends in and Indications for Endoscopy-Assisted Breast Surgery for Breast Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1187:567–90.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Ueda S, Tamaki Y, Yano K, Okishiro N, Yanagisawa T, Imasato M, Shimazu K, Kim SJ, Miyoshi Y, Tanji Y, et al. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surgery. 2008;143(3):414–25.CrossRefPubMed Ueda S, Tamaki Y, Yano K, Okishiro N, Yanagisawa T, Imasato M, Shimazu K, Kim SJ, Miyoshi Y, Tanji Y, et al. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surgery. 2008;143(3):414–25.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, Skillman J, Barnes NLP, Mylvaganam S, Teasdale E, et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):254–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, Skillman J, Barnes NLP, Mylvaganam S, Teasdale E, et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):254–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Mastectomy with Reconstruction Including Robotic Endoscopic Surgery (MARRES): a prospective cohort study of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG) and Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG)
Authors
Jai Min Ryu
Jeea Lee
Jeeyeon Lee
BeomSeok Ko
Joo Heung Kim
Hyukjai Shin
Hyung Seok Park
Korea Robot-endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG)
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10978-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine