Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Paper

Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury

Authors: Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen, Steen Fjord Pedersen, Steen Bønløkke Pedersen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Won Yong Kim

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to validate by histopathology, contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for the assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) in the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Eleven anesthetized pigs underwent CMR 7 to 10 days post infarction. The area-at-risk was measured from T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2-STIR) and contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging (CE-SSFP) images using semi-automated algorithms based on a priori knowledge of perfusion territory. Also, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed to measure final infarct size (FIS). Histopathological comparison with Evans blue dye to define AAR and triphenyltetrazolium chloride to define FIS served as the reference. All infarcts demonstrated MVO on LGE images. Bland–Altman analysis showed no significant bias in AAR or myocardial salvage between T2-STIR and CE-SSFP or between CMR and histopathology. The mean differences ± 2SD from Bland–Altman analysis were: AAR: Evans Blue vs. T2-STIR [0.7%; + 13.5%; − 12.1%]; AAR: Evans Blue vs. CE-SSFP [0.1%; + 13.8%; − 13.7%]; AAR: T2-STIR vs. CE-SSFP [0.7%; + 6.2%; − 4.9%]; Salvage: Evans Blue − TTC vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.8%; + 11.1%; − 9.6%]; Salvage: Evans Blue − TTC vs. CE-SSFP-LGE [0.1%; + 9.9%; − 9.6%]; Salvage: CE-SSFP-LGE vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.7%; + 6.2%; − 4.9%]. Both T2-STIR and CE-SSFP sequences allow for unbiased quantification of AAR in the presence of ischemia/reperfusion injury when analysed by semi-automated algorithms. These experimental data, which was validated by histopathology, supports the use of CMR for the assessment of myocardial salvage during the subacute phase.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Croisille P, Kim HW, Kim RJ (2012) Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury. Radiology 265(1):12–22CrossRefPubMed Croisille P, Kim HW, Kim RJ (2012) Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury. Radiology 265(1):12–22CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hansen ES et al (2016) Cardiovascular MR T2-STIR imaging does not discriminate between intramyocardial haemorrhage and microvascular obstruction during the subacute phase of a reperfused myocardial infarction. Open Heart 3(1):e000346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hansen ES et al (2016) Cardiovascular MR T2-STIR imaging does not discriminate between intramyocardial haemorrhage and microvascular obstruction during the subacute phase of a reperfused myocardial infarction. Open Heart 3(1):e000346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Fernandez-Jimenez R et al (2015) Myocardial edema after ischemia/reperfusion is not stable and follows a bimodal pattern: imaging and histological tissue characterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(4):315–323CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Jimenez R et al (2015) Myocardial edema after ischemia/reperfusion is not stable and follows a bimodal pattern: imaging and histological tissue characterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(4):315–323CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fernandez-Jimenez R et al (2017) Dynamic edematous response of the human heart to myocardial infarction: implications for assessing myocardial area at risk and salvage. Circulation 136(14):1288–1300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fernandez-Jimenez R et al (2017) Dynamic edematous response of the human heart to myocardial infarction: implications for assessing myocardial area at risk and salvage. Circulation 136(14):1288–1300CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sorensson P et al (2010) Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sorensson P et al (2010) Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kumar A et al (2011) CMR imaging of edema in myocardial infarction using cine balanced steady-state free precession. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(12):1265–1273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kumar A et al (2011) CMR imaging of edema in myocardial infarction using cine balanced steady-state free precession. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(12):1265–1273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hammer-Hansen S et al (2017) Early gadolinium enhancement for determination of area at risk: a preclinical validation study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(2):130–139CrossRefPubMed Hammer-Hansen S et al (2017) Early gadolinium enhancement for determination of area at risk: a preclinical validation study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(2):130–139CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nordlund D et al (2017) Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19(1):12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nordlund D et al (2017) Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19(1):12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Pedersen SF et al (2015) Dimethyl sulfoxide reduces microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage in a porcine ischemia–reperfusion model. Heart Res Open J 2(2):85–91CrossRef Pedersen SF et al (2015) Dimethyl sulfoxide reduces microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage in a porcine ischemia–reperfusion model. Heart Res Open J 2(2):85–91CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tufvesson J et al (2016) Automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk from contrast enhanced SSFP CMR: validation against expert readers and SPECT. BMC Med Imaging 16:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tufvesson J et al (2016) Automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk from contrast enhanced SSFP CMR: validation against expert readers and SPECT. BMC Med Imaging 16:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Sjogren J et al (2012) Semi-automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sjogren J et al (2012) Semi-automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Heiberg E et al (2008) Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study. Radiology 246(2):581–588CrossRefPubMed Heiberg E et al (2008) Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study. Radiology 246(2):581–588CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury
Authors
Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen
Steen Fjord Pedersen
Steen Bønløkke Pedersen
Hans Erik Bøtker
Won Yong Kim
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01569-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2019 Go to the issue