Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Lymphoma | Research

Clinical features and images of malignant lymphoma localized in the pancreatic head to differentiate from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case series study

Authors: Naohiro Kato, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Syuhei Sugata, Takuro Hamada, Nao Furuya, Takeshi Mizumoto, Yuzuru Tamaru, Ryusaku Kusunoki, Toshio Kuwai, Hirotaka Kouno, Sho Tazuma, Takeshi Sudo, Miki Kido, Takuo Ito, Kazuya Kuraoka, Hiroshi Kohno

Published in: BMC Gastroenterology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pathological examination by endoscopic ultrasonography–guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been reported to be useful in diagnosing pancreatic malignant lymphoma (ML), but some ML cases are difficult to be differentiated from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

This retrospective study included 8 patients diagnosed with ML that had a pancreatic-head lesion at initial diagnosis and 46 patients with resected PDAC in the pancreatic head between April 2006 and October 2021 at our institute. ML and PDAC were compared in terms of patients’ clinical features and imaging examinations.

Results

The median tumor size was larger in ML than in PDAC (45.8 [24–64] vs. 23.9 [8–44] mm), but the median diameter of the caudal main pancreatic duct (MPD) was larger in PDAC (2.5 [1.0–3.5] vs. 7.1 [2.5–11.8] mm), both showing significant differences between these malignancies (both, P < 0.001). In the analysis of covariance, MLs showed a smaller caudal MPD per tumor size than PDACs, with a statistical difference (P = 0.042). Sensitivity and specificity using sIL-2R ≥ 658 U/mL plus CA19-9 < 37 U/mL for the differentiation of ML from PDAC were 80.0% and 95.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Diagnosing pancreatic ML using cytohistological examination through EUS-FNA can be difficult in some cases. Thus, ML should be suspected if a patient with a pancreatic tumor has a small MPD diameter per tumor size, high serum sIL-2R level, normal CA19-9 level. If the abovementioned features are present and still cannot be confirmed as PDAC, re-examination should be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Behrns KE, Sarr MG, Strickler JG. Pancreatic lymphoma: is it a surgical disease? Pancreas. 1994;9:662–7.CrossRefPubMed Behrns KE, Sarr MG, Strickler JG. Pancreatic lymphoma: is it a surgical disease? Pancreas. 1994;9:662–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–91.CrossRefPubMed Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–91.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1087–95.CrossRefPubMed Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1087–95.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kobayashi H, Ishikawa M, Miyoshi H, Hotta A, Tachikake T, Taniyama D, et al. Primary pancreatic malignant lymphoma difficult to differentiate from pancreatic ductal cancer: a case report. Hiroshimaigaku Jpn. 2018;71:414–7. Kobayashi H, Ishikawa M, Miyoshi H, Hotta A, Tachikake T, Taniyama D, et al. Primary pancreatic malignant lymphoma difficult to differentiate from pancreatic ductal cancer: a case report. Hiroshimaigaku Jpn. 2018;71:414–7.
5.
go back to reference Freeman C, Berg JW, Cutler SJ. Occurrence and prognosis of extranodal lymphomas. Cancer. 1972;29:252–60.CrossRefPubMed Freeman C, Berg JW, Cutler SJ. Occurrence and prognosis of extranodal lymphomas. Cancer. 1972;29:252–60.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Bender GN, Brambs HJ. Imaging findings in pancreatic lymphoma: differential aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:671–5.CrossRefPubMed Merkle EM, Bender GN, Brambs HJ. Imaging findings in pancreatic lymphoma: differential aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:671–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lin A, Feller ER. Pancreatic carcinoma as a cause of unexplained pancreatitis: report of ten cases. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:166–7.CrossRefPubMed Lin A, Feller ER. Pancreatic carcinoma as a cause of unexplained pancreatitis: report of ten cases. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:166–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Facciorusso A, Stasi E, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, Ali Hussein MS, Muscatiello N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:846–53.CrossRefPubMed Facciorusso A, Stasi E, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, Ali Hussein MS, Muscatiello N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:846–53.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, Inzani F, Rimbaș M, Lisotti A, et al. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy. 2023;55:225–34.CrossRefPubMed Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, Inzani F, Rimbaș M, Lisotti A, et al. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy. 2023;55:225–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Facciorusso A, Mohan BP, Crinò SF, Ofosu A, Ramai D, Lisotti A, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15:821–8.CrossRefPubMed Facciorusso A, Mohan BP, Crinò SF, Ofosu A, Ramai D, Lisotti A, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15:821–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Madhu D, Fugazza A, Carrara S, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of different techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;S0016–5107(23):00028–37. Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Madhu D, Fugazza A, Carrara S, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of different techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;S0016–5107(23):00028–37.
12.
go back to reference Conti CB, Mulinacci G, Salerno R, Dinelli ME, Grassia R. Applications of endoscopic ultrasound elastography in pancreatic diseases: from literature to real life. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:909–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Conti CB, Mulinacci G, Salerno R, Dinelli ME, Grassia R. Applications of endoscopic ultrasound elastography in pancreatic diseases: from literature to real life. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:909–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Dong A, Cui Y, Gao L, Wang Y, Zuo C, Yang J. Patterns of FDG uptake in pancreatic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma lesions. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:175–86.CrossRefPubMed Dong A, Cui Y, Gao L, Wang Y, Zuo C, Yang J. Patterns of FDG uptake in pancreatic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma lesions. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:175–86.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fujinaga Y, Lall C, Patel A, Matsushita T, Sanyal R, Kadoya M. MR features of primary and secondary malignant lymphoma of the pancreas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:321–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujinaga Y, Lall C, Patel A, Matsushita T, Sanyal R, Kadoya M. MR features of primary and secondary malignant lymphoma of the pancreas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:321–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Yoshida K, Iwashita T, Mita N, Iwasa Y, Uemura S, Shimizu M. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the differentiation of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A single-center retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:2054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoshida K, Iwashita T, Mita N, Iwasa Y, Uemura S, Shimizu M. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the differentiation of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A single-center retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:2054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Murakami J, Arita K, Wada A, Mihara H, Origasa H, Kigawa M, et al. Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels for screening for malignant lymphomas and differential diagnosis from other conditions. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11:474–82.PubMedPubMedCentral Murakami J, Arita K, Wada A, Mihara H, Origasa H, Kigawa M, et al. Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels for screening for malignant lymphomas and differential diagnosis from other conditions. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11:474–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Huang Z, Liu F. Diagnostic value of serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:7459–65.CrossRefPubMed Huang Z, Liu F. Diagnostic value of serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:7459–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical features and images of malignant lymphoma localized in the pancreatic head to differentiate from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case series study
Authors
Naohiro Kato
Atsushi Yamaguchi
Syuhei Sugata
Takuro Hamada
Nao Furuya
Takeshi Mizumoto
Yuzuru Tamaru
Ryusaku Kusunoki
Toshio Kuwai
Hirotaka Kouno
Sho Tazuma
Takeshi Sudo
Miki Kido
Takuo Ito
Kazuya Kuraoka
Hiroshi Kohno
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-230X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02779-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.