Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients

Authors: Keisuke Uemura, Masaki Takao, Hidetoshi Hamada, Takashi Sakai, Kenji Ohzono, Nobuhiko Sugano

Published in: Journal of Artificial Organs | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Several reports have shown good long-term results with the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty, but little is known about the results in Asian countries where there is a high prevalence of osteonecrosis and developmental dysplasia of the hip, and many females with small femoral head sizes. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the long-term clinical results of the BHR in 112 Japanese patients (53 males and 59 females—130 hips) with an average age of 52 years. Implant survivorship was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with the endpoint being revision for any reason. Factors such as sex, femoral component size, and type of hip disease were analyzed as predictors of implant survivorship. With a median follow-up of 12 years, six cases were revised (two for femoral component aseptic loosening, two for infection, one for cup aseptic loosening, and one for femoral neck fracture), and the overall survival rate was 96.5% (95% CI 90.9–98.7) at 10 years and 93.6% (95% CI 83.4–97.7) at 15 years. When septic revisions were excluded, the implant survival rate was 98.2% (95% CI 92.9–99.6) at 10 years and 95.3% (95% CI 83.9–98.7) at 15 years. Sex, femoral component size, and type of hip disease were not predictors of implant survivorship. In conclusion, good clinical results were obtained with the BHR at 10- and 15-year follow-up in Japanese patients who have different stature and types of hip diseases as compared with patients in Western countries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. 2011;35:231–7.CrossRefPubMed McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. 2011;35:231–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:185–9. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:308–14.CrossRef Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:185–9. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:308–14.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gerhardt DM, Smolders JM, Rijnders TA, Hol A, van Susante JL. Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to 5 years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:308–14.CrossRef Gerhardt DM, Smolders JM, Rijnders TA, Hol A, van Susante JL. Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to 5 years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:308–14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aqil A, Drabu R, Bergmann JH, Masjedi M, Manning V, Andrews B, et al. The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop. 2013;37:795–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aqil A, Drabu R, Bergmann JH, Masjedi M, Manning V, Andrews B, et al. The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop. 2013;37:795–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Abe H, Sakai T, Nishii T, Takao M, Nakamura N, Sugano N. Jogging after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:131–7.CrossRefPubMed Abe H, Sakai T, Nishii T, Takao M, Nakamura N, Sugano N. Jogging after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:131–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ, Skinner JA, Nargol AV, Nolan JF, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:572–9.CrossRef Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ, Skinner JA, Nargol AV, Nolan JF, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:572–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC. Five-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing system: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:2287–93.CrossRef de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC. Five-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing system: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:2287–93.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:27–33.CrossRef Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2011;93:27–33.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of 10 years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:315–21.CrossRef Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of 10 years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:315–21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:471–6.CrossRef Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:471–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Van Der Straeten C, Van Quickenborne D, De Roest B, Calistri A, Victor J, De Smet K. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham hip resurfacings decline significantly at 10 years. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B:1332–8.CrossRef Van Der Straeten C, Van Quickenborne D, De Roest B, Calistri A, Victor J, De Smet K. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham hip resurfacings decline significantly at 10 years. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B:1332–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Pynsent WB, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB. The outcome of the Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients aged <50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:1172–7.CrossRefPubMed Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Pynsent WB, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB. The outcome of the Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients aged <50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:1172–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J. 2014;96:1298–306.CrossRef Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J. 2014;96:1298–306.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reito A, Puolakka T, Elo P, Pajamäki J, Eskelinen A. Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 10 years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours. Int Orthop. 2014;38:2251–7.CrossRefPubMed Reito A, Puolakka T, Elo P, Pajamäki J, Eskelinen A. Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 10 years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours. Int Orthop. 2014;38:2251–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mehra A, Berryman F, Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Isbister ES. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a single surgeon series reported at a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:1160–6.CrossRef Mehra A, Berryman F, Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Isbister ES. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a single surgeon series reported at a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:1160–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Azam MQ, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Sankineani SR. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Int Orthop. 2016;40:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Azam MQ, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Sankineani SR. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Int Orthop. 2016;40:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brooks PJ. Hip resurfacing: a large, US single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J. 2016;98:10–3.CrossRef Brooks PJ. Hip resurfacing: a large, US single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J. 2016;98:10–3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplast. 2007;22:176–83.CrossRef Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplast. 2007;22:176–83.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:190. Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:190.
22.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231.CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1993;75:228–32.CrossRef Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1993;75:228–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:20. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:20.
25.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2 to 6-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:28.CrossRef Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2 to 6-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:28.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, et al. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2012;94:317–25.CrossRef Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, et al. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2012;94:317–25.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Daniel J, Ziaee H, Kamali A, Pradhan C, Band T, McMinn DJ. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2010;92:20–7.CrossRef Daniel J, Ziaee H, Kamali A, Pradhan C, Band T, McMinn DJ. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2010;92:20–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int. 2008;18:212–9.CrossRefPubMed Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int. 2008;18:212–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:1874–7.CrossRef Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:1874–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Spears IR, Pfleiderer M, Schneider E, Hille E, Morlock MM. The effect of interfacial parameters on cup–bone relative micromotions: a finite element investigation. J Biomech. 2001;34:113–20.CrossRefPubMed Spears IR, Pfleiderer M, Schneider E, Hille E, Morlock MM. The effect of interfacial parameters on cup–bone relative micromotions: a finite element investigation. J Biomech. 2001;34:113–20.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:375–81.CrossRefPubMed Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Hip resurfacing results for osteonecrosis are as good as for other etiologies at 2 to 12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:375–81.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Takao M, Nakamura N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N. The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplast. 2011;26:562–8.CrossRef Takao M, Nakamura N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N. The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplast. 2011;26:562–8.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Matharu GS, Pandit HG, Murray DW. Poor survivorship and frequent complications at a median of 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:304–14.CrossRefPubMed Matharu GS, Pandit HG, Murray DW. Poor survivorship and frequent complications at a median of 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:304–14.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients
Authors
Keisuke Uemura
Masaki Takao
Hidetoshi Hamada
Takashi Sakai
Kenji Ohzono
Nobuhiko Sugano
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-7229
Electronic ISSN: 1619-0904
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0981-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Artificial Organs 1/2018 Go to the issue