Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Original Paper

The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study

Authors: Adeel Aqil, Roshan Drabu, Jeroen H. Bergmann, Milad Masjedi, Victoria Manning, Barry Andrews, Sarah K. Muirhead-Allwood, Justin P. Cobb

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purposes

Post arthroplasty gait analysis has up till now been performed on subjects walking slowly on flat ground rather than challenging them at faster speeds or walking uphill. We therefore asked: (1) Is there a measurable difference in the performance of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) limbs at patients’ self-determined fastest walking speeds and steepest inclines? and (2) Is there a relationship between the observed differences between the gait of HRA and THA implanted limbs and patient walking speeds and inclines.

Methods

In an ethically approved study we recruited patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties: one HRA and one THA. Nine subjects were assessed using an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds and inclines by a blinded observer. The ground reaction forces of subjects were recorded and an age, sex and BMI matched control group was used for comparison.

Results

Increasing walking speed correlated strongly with between leg differences in weight acceptance (r = 0.9, p = 0.000) and push-off force (r = 0.79, p = 0.002). HRA implanted limbs accepted significantly more weight at top walking speeds (1208 N ± 320 versus 1279 N ± 370, p = 0.026) and pushed off with greater force when walking uphill (818 N ± 163 versus 855 ± 166, p = 0.012). HRA limbs more closely approximated to the gait of the normal control group.

Conclusions

Arthroplasty implants do have an impact on the gait characteristics of patients. Differences in gait are more likely to be evident when assessment is made at fast speeds and walking uphill. This study suggests that HRA may enable a more normal gait.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A (2007) Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(1):100–108. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.010 CrossRef Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A (2007) Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(1):100–108. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2006.​03.​010 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA (2010) The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):326–336. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0938-z PubMedCrossRef Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA (2010) The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):326–336. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-009-0938-z PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffin DR (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344:e2147. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2147 PubMedCrossRef Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffin DR (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344:e2147. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e2147 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, Voight M, Soballe K (2011) Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 35(5):667–674. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1040-6 PubMedCrossRef Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, Voight M, Soballe K (2011) Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 35(5):667–674. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-010-1040-6 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Houdijk H, van Ooijen MW, Kraal JJ, Wiggerts HO, Polomski W, Janssen TW, Roerdink M (2012) Assessing gait adaptability in people with a unilateral amputation on an instrumented treadmill with projected visual context. Phys Ther 92(11):1452–1460. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110362 Houdijk H, van Ooijen MW, Kraal JJ, Wiggerts HO, Polomski W, Janssen TW, Roerdink M (2012) Assessing gait adaptability in people with a unilateral amputation on an instrumented treadmill with projected visual context. Phys Ther 92(11):1452–1460. doi:10.​2522/​ptj.​20110362
8.
go back to reference Hofstad CJ, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Weerdesteyn V, Duysens J, Geurts AC (2006) High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(8):1115–1122. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.009 PubMedCrossRef Hofstad CJ, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Weerdesteyn V, Duysens J, Geurts AC (2006) High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(8):1115–1122. doi:10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2006.​04.​009 PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hofstad CJ, Weerdesteyn V, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Geurts AC, Duysens J (2009) Evidence for bilaterally delayed and decreased obstacle avoidance responses while walking with a lower limb prosthesis. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 120(5):1009–1015. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.003 CrossRef Hofstad CJ, Weerdesteyn V, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Geurts AC, Duysens J (2009) Evidence for bilaterally delayed and decreased obstacle avoidance responses while walking with a lower limb prosthesis. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 120(5):1009–1015. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinph.​2009.​03.​003 CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Schniepp R, Wuehr M, Neuhaeusser M, Kamenova M, Dimitriadis K, Klopstock T, Strupp M, Brandt T, Jahn K (2012) Locomotion speed determines gait variability in cerebellar ataxia and vestibular failure. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc 27(1):125–131. doi:10.1002/mds.23978 CrossRef Schniepp R, Wuehr M, Neuhaeusser M, Kamenova M, Dimitriadis K, Klopstock T, Strupp M, Brandt T, Jahn K (2012) Locomotion speed determines gait variability in cerebellar ataxia and vestibular failure. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc 27(1):125–131. doi:10.​1002/​mds.​23978 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wiik A, Lewis A, Amis A, Cobb J (2012) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty enables faster walking and longer stride length than total hip arthroplasty. In: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, San Francisco. Paper no. 657 Wiik A, Lewis A, Amis A, Cobb J (2012) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty enables faster walking and longer stride length than total hip arthroplasty. In: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, San Francisco. Paper no. 657
13.
go back to reference Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H (2000) Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture 11(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H (2000) Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture 11(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study
Authors
Adeel Aqil
Roshan Drabu
Jeroen H. Bergmann
Milad Masjedi
Victoria Manning
Barry Andrews
Sarah K. Muirhead-Allwood
Justin P. Cobb
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1819-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

International Orthopaedics 5/2013 Go to the issue