Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2019

01-11-2019 | Liver Resection | Scientific Review

Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review

Authors: Théophile Guilbaud, David Jérémie Birnbaum, Stéphane Berdah, Olivier Farges, Laura Beyer Berjot

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The laparoscopic approach is widely accepted as the procedure of choice for abdominal surgery. However, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has advanced slowly due to the significant learning curve (LC), and only few publications have dealt with advanced training in LLR.

Methods

Two reviewers conducted systematic research through MEDLINE and EMBASE with combinations of the following keywords: (learning curve OR teaching OR training OR simulation OR education) AND (liver OR hepatic) AND (laparoscopic OR laparoscopy). Robotic-assisted, hand-assisted and hybrid LLRs were excluded.

Results

Nineteen studies were retrieved. Overall, the level of evidence was low. Thirteen articles assessed the LC during real-life LLR, and six articles focussed on simulation and training programmes in LLR. The LC in minor LLR comprised 60 cases overall, and 15 cases for standardised left lateral sectionectomy. For major LLR (MLLR), the LC was 50 cases for most studies, but was reported to be 15–20 cases in more recent studies, provided MLLR is performed progressively in selected patients. However, there was heterogeneity in the literature regarding the number of minor LLRs required before MLLR, with 60 minor LLRs reported as the minimum. Six studies showed a potential benefit of simulation and training programmes in this field. The gradual implementation of LLR combined with simulation-based training programmes could reduce the clinical impact of LC.

Conclusions

The LC in LLR is a long process, and MLLR should be gradually implemented under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Training outside the operating room may reduce the LC in real-life situations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRef Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA; Color II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA; Color II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tranchart H, Dagher I (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection: a review. J Visc Surg 151:114–122 Tranchart H, Dagher I (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection: a review. J Visc Surg 151:114–122
4.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery 163:985–995CrossRef Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery 163:985–995CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24:1170–1176CrossRef Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24:1170–1176CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198:173–177CrossRef Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198:173–177CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Belli G, Cioffi L, Fantini C et al (2009) Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results. Surg Endosc 23:1807–1811CrossRef Belli G, Cioffi L, Fantini C et al (2009) Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results. Surg Endosc 23:1807–1811CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRef Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Halls MC, Cherqui D, Taylor MA, Collaborators of The Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Survey et al (2018) Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future. HPB 20:231–236CrossRef Halls MC, Cherqui D, Taylor MA, Collaborators of The Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Survey et al (2018) Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future. HPB 20:231–236CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2017) A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 31:5356–5363CrossRef Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2017) A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 31:5356–5363CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A et al (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J Am Coll Surg 225:249–258CrossRef Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A et al (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J Am Coll Surg 225:249–258CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N et al (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N et al (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Couinaud C (1957) Le foie: etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Masson et Cie, Paris Couinaud C (1957) Le foie: etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Masson et Cie, Paris
17.
go back to reference Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782CrossRef Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y et al (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102:796–804CrossRef Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y et al (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102:796–804CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee W, Woo JW, Lee JK et al (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:457–464CrossRef Lee W, Woo JW, Lee JK et al (2016) Comparison of learning curves for major and minor laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:457–464CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F et al (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 151:923–928CrossRef van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F et al (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 151:923–928CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Komatsu S, Scatton O, Goumard C et al (2016) Development process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: learning curve based on 15 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 224:841–850CrossRef Komatsu S, Scatton O, Goumard C et al (2016) Development process and technical aspects of laparoscopic hepatectomy: learning curve based on 15 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 224:841–850CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liu W, Wang Q, Huang J et al (2014) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy—the learning curve and the role of left hepatic inflow occlusion. Hepatogastroenterology 61:417–421PubMed Liu W, Wang Q, Huang J et al (2014) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy—the learning curve and the role of left hepatic inflow occlusion. Hepatogastroenterology 61:417–421PubMed
23.
go back to reference Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y et al (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28:1334–1341CrossRef Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y et al (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28:1334–1341CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lin CW, Tsai TJ, Cheng TY et al (2016) The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surg Endosc 30:2895–2903CrossRef Lin CW, Tsai TJ, Cheng TY et al (2016) The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surg Endosc 30:2895–2903CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Takahara T et al (2017) Safely extending the indications of laparoscopic liver resection: when should we start laparoscopic major hepatectomy? Surg Endosc 31:309–316CrossRef Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Takahara T et al (2017) Safely extending the indications of laparoscopic liver resection: when should we start laparoscopic major hepatectomy? Surg Endosc 31:309–316CrossRef
26.
go back to reference van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA et al (1995) Cusum as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82:1500–1503CrossRef van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA et al (1995) Cusum as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82:1500–1503CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green, S (2016) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Chichester, Wiley Higgins JPT, Green, S (2016) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Chichester, Wiley
28.
go back to reference Gluud C, Als-Nielsen B, D'Amico G, et al (2007) Cochrane hepato-biliary group. about the cochrane collaboration (Cochrane Reviews Groups (CRGs)). Issue 2. Art. no.: LIVER. Wiley, Chichester Gluud C, Als-Nielsen B, D'Amico G, et al (2007) Cochrane hepato-biliary group. about the cochrane collaboration (Cochrane Reviews Groups (CRGs)). Issue 2. Art. no.: LIVER. Wiley, Chichester
29.
go back to reference Ratti F, Barkhatov LI, Tomassini F et al (2016) Learning curve of self-taught laparoscopic liver surgeons in left lateral sectionectomy: results from an international multi-institutional analysis on 245 cases. Surg Endosc 30:3618–3629CrossRef Ratti F, Barkhatov LI, Tomassini F et al (2016) Learning curve of self-taught laparoscopic liver surgeons in left lateral sectionectomy: results from an international multi-institutional analysis on 245 cases. Surg Endosc 30:3618–3629CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Villani V, Bohnen JD, Torabi R et al (2016) “Idealized” vs. “true” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 18:504–509CrossRef Villani V, Bohnen JD, Torabi R et al (2016) “Idealized” vs. “true” learning curves: the case of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 18:504–509CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 25:305–308CrossRef Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 25:305–308CrossRef
32.
go back to reference O'Connor VV, Vuong B, Yang ST et al (2017) Robotic minor hepatectomy offers a favorable learning curve and may result in superior perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic approach. Am Surg 83:1085–1088PubMed O'Connor VV, Vuong B, Yang ST et al (2017) Robotic minor hepatectomy offers a favorable learning curve and may result in superior perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic approach. Am Surg 83:1085–1088PubMed
33.
go back to reference Tomassini F, Scuderi V, Colman R et al (2016) The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5138CrossRef Tomassini F, Scuderi V, Colman R et al (2016) The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5138CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Strickland A, Fairhurst K, Lauder C et al (2011) Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 25:1677–1682CrossRef Strickland A, Fairhurst K, Lauder C et al (2011) Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 25:1677–1682CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Xiao J, Cui Z, Fu M et al (2016) An ex vivo liver training model continuously perfused to simulate bleeding for suture skills involved in laparoscopic liver resection: development and validity. Surg Endosc 30:4553–4561CrossRef Xiao J, Cui Z, Fu M et al (2016) An ex vivo liver training model continuously perfused to simulate bleeding for suture skills involved in laparoscopic liver resection: development and validity. Surg Endosc 30:4553–4561CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Udomsawaengsup S, Pattana-arun J, Tansatit T et al (2005) Minimally invasive surgery training in soft cadaver (MIST-SC). J Med Assoc Thai 88:S189–194PubMed Udomsawaengsup S, Pattana-arun J, Tansatit T et al (2005) Minimally invasive surgery training in soft cadaver (MIST-SC). J Med Assoc Thai 88:S189–194PubMed
37.
go back to reference Teh SH, Hunter JG, Sheppard BC (2007) A suitable animal model for laparoscopic hepatic resection training. Surg Endosc 21:1738–1744CrossRef Teh SH, Hunter JG, Sheppard BC (2007) A suitable animal model for laparoscopic hepatic resection training. Surg Endosc 21:1738–1744CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Komorowski AL, Mituś JW, Sanchez Hurtado MA et al (2015) Porcine model in the laparoscopic liver surgery training. Pol Przegl Chir 87:425–428PubMed Komorowski AL, Mituś JW, Sanchez Hurtado MA et al (2015) Porcine model in the laparoscopic liver surgery training. Pol Przegl Chir 87:425–428PubMed
39.
go back to reference White SA, Satchidanand RY, French JJ et al (2014) A cadaver lab training facility to facilitate laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:357–360CrossRef White SA, Satchidanand RY, French JJ et al (2014) A cadaver lab training facility to facilitate laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:357–360CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Goutte N, Bendersky N, Barbier L et al (2017) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a population-based study. HPB 19:118–125CrossRef Goutte N, Bendersky N, Barbier L et al (2017) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: a population-based study. HPB 19:118–125CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9,000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9,000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I et al (2018) The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg 268:11–18CrossRef Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I et al (2018) The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg 268:11–18CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Brown KM, Geller DA (2016) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 20:1065–1071CrossRef Brown KM, Geller DA (2016) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 20:1065–1071CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Sasaki A et al (2013) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy as a training procedure for surgeons learning laparoscopic hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:525–530CrossRef Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Sasaki A et al (2013) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy as a training procedure for surgeons learning laparoscopic hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:525–530CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F et al (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg 261:1226–1231CrossRef Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F et al (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg 261:1226–1231CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Halls MC, Alseidi A, Berardi G et al (2018) A comparison of the learning curves of laparoscopic liver surgeons in differing stages of the IDEAL paradigm of surgical innovation: standing on the shoulders of pioneers. Ann Surg 269:221–228CrossRef Halls MC, Alseidi A, Berardi G et al (2018) A comparison of the learning curves of laparoscopic liver surgeons in differing stages of the IDEAL paradigm of surgical innovation: standing on the shoulders of pioneers. Ann Surg 269:221–228CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A et al (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300CrossRef Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A et al (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150CrossRef Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463CrossRef Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV et al (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191:272–283CrossRef Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV et al (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191:272–283CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Beyer L, De Troyer J, Mancini J et al (2011) Impact of laparoscopy simulator training on the technical skills of future surgeons in the operating room: a prospective study. Am J Surg 202:265–272CrossRef Beyer L, De Troyer J, Mancini J et al (2011) Impact of laparoscopy simulator training on the technical skills of future surgeons in the operating room: a prospective study. Am J Surg 202:265–272CrossRef
52.
go back to reference De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, Kulkarni J et al (2016) An evidence-based laparoscopic simulation curriculum shortens the clinical learning curve and reduces surgical adverse events. Adv Med Educ Pract 30:357–370CrossRef De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, Kulkarni J et al (2016) An evidence-based laparoscopic simulation curriculum shortens the clinical learning curve and reduces surgical adverse events. Adv Med Educ Pract 30:357–370CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Bansal VK, Raveendran R, Misra MC et al (2014) A prospective randomized controlled blinded study to evaluate the effect of short-term focused training program in laparoscopy on operating room performance of surgery residents (CTRI /2012/11/003113). J Surg Educ 71:52–60CrossRef Bansal VK, Raveendran R, Misra MC et al (2014) A prospective randomized controlled blinded study to evaluate the effect of short-term focused training program in laparoscopy on operating room performance of surgery residents (CTRI /2012/11/003113). J Surg Educ 71:52–60CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Beyer-Berjot L, Palter V, Grantcharov T et al (2014) Advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 156:676–688CrossRef Beyer-Berjot L, Palter V, Grantcharov T et al (2014) Advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 156:676–688CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Helling TS, Khandelwal A (2008) The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 12:153–158CrossRef Helling TS, Khandelwal A (2008) The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 12:153–158CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Beyer-Berjot L, Pucher P, Patel V et al (2017) Colorectal surgery and enhanced recovery: impact of a simulation-based care pathway training curriculum. J Visc Surg 154:313–320CrossRef Beyer-Berjot L, Pucher P, Patel V et al (2017) Colorectal surgery and enhanced recovery: impact of a simulation-based care pathway training curriculum. J Visc Surg 154:313–320CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Lin E, Szomstein S, Addasi T et al (2003) Model for teaching laparoscopic colectomy to surgical residents. Am J Surg 186:45–48CrossRef Lin E, Szomstein S, Addasi T et al (2003) Model for teaching laparoscopic colectomy to surgical residents. Am J Surg 186:45–48CrossRef
58.
go back to reference van der Poel MJ, Huisman F, Busch OR et al (2017) Stepwise introduction of laparoscopic liver surgery: validation of guideline recommendations. HPB 19:894–900CrossRef van der Poel MJ, Huisman F, Busch OR et al (2017) Stepwise introduction of laparoscopic liver surgery: validation of guideline recommendations. HPB 19:894–900CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review
Authors
Théophile Guilbaud
David Jérémie Birnbaum
Stéphane Berdah
Olivier Farges
Laura Beyer Berjot
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05111-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

World Journal of Surgery 11/2019 Go to the issue

Original Scientific Report

Surgical Notes: To Play or Not to Play