Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011

01-05-2011 | New Technology

Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection

Authors: Andrew Strickland, Katherine Fairhurst, Chris Lauder, Peter Hewett, Guy Maddern

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The number of patients who have undergone laparoscopic liver surgery has increased in the last 15 years. It is technically challenging surgery, requiring both advanced laparoscopic and liver resection skills. Surgeons often require familiarisation with much of the equipment and techniques used in this type of surgery. No ex vivo model currently exists for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The aim of this study was to develop a model for acquiring the technical skills involved in LLR that was also able to assess and measure surgical performance.

Methods

The ProMIS augmented reality surgical simulator was selected because performance data other than time could be obtained, and the simulator was adapted to create the laparoscopic trainer. Twenty candidates with differing laparoscopic surgical experience tested the model. Three groups were identified, novice, intermediate, and expert, according to previous exposure to the laparoscopic tasks. Candidates were required to identify a tumour ultrasonographically, mark and transect ex vivo liver, and perform two laparoscopic stitches with intracorporeal knots. The ProMIS recorded the performance data, including instrument path lengths and time.

Results

Measurements taken from the ProMIS simulator were analysed for statistical differences between the groups. Expert surgeons showed a statistically significant difference in the time taken to identify the liver lesion and transect the organ. The results also demonstrate that the more difficult tasks such as laparoscopic suturing are completed by the expert surgeons with statistically significant shorter times and path lengths compared to the less experienced surgeons.

Conclusion

The adapted ProMIS augmented reality simulator provided junior surgeons with a realistic learning environment in which to familiarise themselves with the equipment and techniques required for LLR. The model also allows assessment of the performance of individuals over time and within a peer group. Construct validity is proven for the suturing component of the model.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L, Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) Study Group (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22, 953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728PubMedCrossRef Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L, Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) Study Group (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22, 953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068PubMedCrossRef Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738PubMedCrossRef Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vigano L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver surgery: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421PubMedCrossRef Vigano L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver surgery: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422PubMedCrossRef Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2084 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2084 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg 250:772–782PubMedCrossRef Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg 250:772–782PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487PubMedCrossRef Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Gitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518-525 (discussion 525–528) Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Gitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518-525 (discussion 525–528)
11.
go back to reference Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1523–1532PubMedCrossRef Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1523–1532PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300PubMedCrossRef Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2009) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006575 Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2009) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006575
15.
go back to reference Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS (2009) Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338:b1802PubMedCrossRef Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS (2009) Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338:b1802PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179PubMedCrossRef Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19:401–405PubMedCrossRef Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19:401–405PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Van Sickle KR, McClusky DA, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231CrossRef Van Sickle KR, McClusky DA, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection
Authors
Andrew Strickland
Katherine Fairhurst
Chris Lauder
Peter Hewett
Guy Maddern
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1440-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011 Go to the issue