Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022

Open Access 09-02-2022 | Liposuction | Review

Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Authors: Alessandro Innocenti, Dario Melita, Emanuela Dreassi

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gynecomastia is nowadays a very common disease, affecting a large cohort of patients with different ages. The aim of this literature review is to assess the incidence of complications with all proposed techniques and for combined procedures versus single approach procedures in gynecomastia correction.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all reported techniques for gynecomastia correction covering a period from January 1, 1987 to November 1, 2020. For all selected papers, demographic data, proposed technique, and complications’ incidence have been recorded.

Results

A total number of 3970 results was obtained from database analysis. A final total number of 94 articles was obtained for 7294 patients analyzed. Patients have been divided into three groups: aspiration techniques, consisting in 874 patients (11,98%), surgical excision techniques, consisting in 2764 patients (37,90%), and combined techniques, consisting in 3656 patients (50,12%). Complications have been recorded for all groups, for a total number of 1407, of which 130 among “Aspiration techniques” group (14,87%), 847 among “Surgical excision techniques” group (30,64%), and 430 in “Combined techniques” group (11,76%).

Conclusions

Several techniques have been proposed in the literature to address gynecomastia, with the potential to greatly improve self-confidence and overall appearance of affected patients. The combined use of surgical excision and aspiration techniques seems to reduce the rate of complications compared to surgical excision alone, but the lack of unique classification and the presence of several surgical techniques still represents a bias in the literature review.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 56:237–246CrossRef Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 56:237–246CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Schröder L, Rudlowski C, Walgenbach-Brünagel G, Leutner C, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ (2015) Surgical strategies in the treatment of gynecomastia grade I-II: the combination of liposuction and subcutaneous mastectomy provides excellent patient outcome and satisfaction. Breast Care (Basel) 10(3):184–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381152CrossRef Schröder L, Rudlowski C, Walgenbach-Brünagel G, Leutner C, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ (2015) Surgical strategies in the treatment of gynecomastia grade I-II: the combination of liposuction and subcutaneous mastectomy provides excellent patient outcome and satisfaction. Breast Care (Basel) 10(3):184–188. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000381152CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Taheri AR, Farahvash MR, Fathi HR, Ghanbarzadeh K, Faridniya B (2016) The satisfaction rate among patients and surgeons after periareolar surgical approach to gynecomastia along with liposuction. World J Plast Surg 5(3):287–292PubMedPubMedCentral Taheri AR, Farahvash MR, Fathi HR, Ghanbarzadeh K, Faridniya B (2016) The satisfaction rate among patients and surgeons after periareolar surgical approach to gynecomastia along with liposuction. World J Plast Surg 5(3):287–292PubMedPubMedCentral
97.
go back to reference Pfeiler PP, Luketina R, Dastagir K, Vogt PM, Mett TR, Kaltenborn A, Könneker S (2021) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(2):431–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02029-xCrossRef Pfeiler PP, Luketina R, Dastagir K, Vogt PM, Mett TR, Kaltenborn A, Könneker S (2021) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(2):431–437. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00266-020-02029-xCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Re: a novel method to insert drain atraumatically after liposuction in gynecomastia. Indian J Plast Surg. 51(3):342–343CrossRef Innocenti A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Re: a novel method to insert drain atraumatically after liposuction in gynecomastia. Indian J Plast Surg. 51(3):342–343CrossRef
102.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Serena G, Innocenti M (2021) External quilting: new technique to avoid haematoma in gynaecomastia surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(2):831–832CrossRef Innocenti A, Serena G, Innocenti M (2021) External quilting: new technique to avoid haematoma in gynaecomastia surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(2):831–832CrossRef
103.
go back to reference Innocenti A (2019) Male tuberous breast: a rare variant of gynecomastia. Clinical considerations and personal experience: tips and tricks to maximize surgical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 43(6):1500–1505CrossRef Innocenti A (2019) Male tuberous breast: a rare variant of gynecomastia. Clinical considerations and personal experience: tips and tricks to maximize surgical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 43(6):1500–1505CrossRef
104.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Innocenti M (2019) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg 83(3):367CrossRef Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Innocenti M (2019) Correction of tuberous nipple areolar complex deformity in gynecomastia: the deformity that can get forgotten. Ann Plast Surg 83(3):367CrossRef
106.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Parisi D, Portincasa A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “orange peel excision of gland: a novel surgical technique for treatment of gynecomastia.” Ann Plast Surg 79(3):326CrossRef Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Parisi D, Portincasa A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “orange peel excision of gland: a novel surgical technique for treatment of gynecomastia.” Ann Plast Surg 79(3):326CrossRef
107.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D (2020) Commentary on “surgical treatment of gynaecomastia: a standard of care in plastic surgery” by Tobias R. Mett, Peter P. Pfeiler, Rosalia Luketina, Alperen S. Bingöl, Nicco Krezdorn & Peter M. Vogt. Eur J Plast Surg 43(5): 1-2 Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D (2020) Commentary on “surgical treatment of gynaecomastia: a standard of care in plastic surgery” by Tobias R. Mett, Peter P. Pfeiler, Rosalia Luketina, Alperen S. Bingöl, Nicco Krezdorn & Peter M. Vogt. Eur J Plast Surg 43(5): 1-2
108.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti, (2018) Comment to: “complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database.” Aesthet Plast Surg 42(1):334–335CrossRef Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti, (2018) Comment to: “complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database.” Aesthet Plast Surg 42(1):334–335CrossRef
109.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, Parisi D (2017) Discussion: surgical management of gynecomastia-subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):983–984CrossRef Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Portincasa A, Parisi D (2017) Discussion: surgical management of gynecomastia-subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):983–984CrossRef
110.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Melita D (2021) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(3):1350–1351CrossRef Innocenti A, Melita D (2021) Expected reduction of the nipple-areolar complex over time after treatment of gynecomastia with ultrasound-assisted liposuction mastectomy compared to subcutaneous mastectomy alone. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(3):1350–1351CrossRef
111.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Reply to the comment on: management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg 79(2):226–227CrossRef Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Reply to the comment on: management of gynecomastia in patients with different body types: considerations on 312 consecutive treated cases. Ann Plast Surg 79(2):226–227CrossRef
112.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(6):1716–1717CrossRef Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(6):1716–1717CrossRef
117.
go back to reference Ciancio F, Innocenti A, Parisi D, Portincasa A (2017) Gynecomastia -classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):620e–621eCrossRef Ciancio F, Innocenti A, Parisi D, Portincasa A (2017) Gynecomastia -classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):620e–621eCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment on: “surgical masculinization of the breast: clinical classification and surgical procedures.” Aesthet Plast Surg 41(6):1475–1476CrossRef Innocenti A, Ghezzi S, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment on: “surgical masculinization of the breast: clinical classification and surgical procedures.” Aesthet Plast Surg 41(6):1475–1476CrossRef
119.
go back to reference Innocenti A, Melita D, Ghezzi S, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to: “the characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia.” Aesthet Plast Surg 41(6):1467–1468CrossRef Innocenti A, Melita D, Ghezzi S, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to: “the characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia.” Aesthet Plast Surg 41(6):1467–1468CrossRef
126.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Tsangaris E, Salzillo R, Morelli Coppola M, Ciarrocchi S, Brunetti B, Tenna S, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) Treatment of severe gynecomastia after massive weight loss: analysis of long-term outcomes measured with the italian version of the BODY-Q. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(6):1506–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1232-9CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Tsangaris E, Salzillo R, Morelli Coppola M, Ciarrocchi S, Brunetti B, Tenna S, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) Treatment of severe gynecomastia after massive weight loss: analysis of long-term outcomes measured with the italian version of the BODY-Q. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(6):1506–1518. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00266-018-1232-9CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Authors
Alessandro Innocenti
Dario Melita
Emanuela Dreassi
Publication date
09-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02782-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue