The round-the-clock technique for correction of gynecomastia

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Gynecomastia is a common condition that can cause severe emotional and physical distress in both young and older men. Patients in whom symptomatic recalcitrant gynecomastia persists for a long time are potential candidates for surgery.

Methods From January 2014 to January 2016, 15 patients underwent correction of gynecomastia through a single 3-mm incision at our institution. Only patients with true gynecomastia underwent surgery with this new technique. Through the small incision, sharp dissection was performed in a clockwise and counterclockwise direction describing two half-circles. Health-related quality of life and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using a modified version of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire (BEQ).

Results The patients’ average age was 23.5 years (range, 18–28 years), and their average body mass index was 23.2 kg/m² (range, 19.2–25.3 kg/m²). One case was unilateral and 14 cases were bilateral. The weight of glandular tissue resected from each breast ranged from 80 to 170 g. No excess skin was excised. Bleeding was minimal. The mean operating time was 25 minutes (range, 21–40 minutes). No complications were recorded. All lesions were histologically benign. The patients’ average score was 3.5 (on a 5-point Likert scale) in all domains of the BEQ for themselves and their partners.

Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated the safety and reliability of a new technique that allows mastectomy through an imperceptible 3-mm incision. We obtained high patient satisfaction scores using our surgical technique, and patients reported considerable improvement in their social, physical, and psychological well-being after surgery.

Publication History

Received: 09 May 2018

Accepted: 03 May 2019

Article published online:
28 March 2022

© 2019. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A. Gynecomastia classification for surgical management: a systematic review and novel classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 638e-648e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Mentz HA, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G. et al. Correction of gynecomastia through a single puncture incision. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 244-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Cigna E, Tarallo M, Fino P. et al. Surgical correction of gynecomastia in thin patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35: 439-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ridha H, Colville RJ, Vesely MJ. How happy are patients with their gynaecomastia reduction surgery?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1473-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 48-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Wiesman IM, Lehman Jr JA, Parker MG. et al. Gynecomastia: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 97-101
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Telegrafo M, Introna T, Coi L. et al. Breast US as primary imaging modality for diagnosing gynecomastia. G Chir 2016; 37: 118-22
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Lee BH, Kwon YJ, Park JW. et al. Gynecomastia surgery is associated with improved nipple location in young Korean patients. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 748-52
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kasielska-Trojan A, Antoszewski B. Gynecomastia surgery-impact on life quality: a prospective case-control study. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78: 264-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Munoz Carrasco R, Alvarez Benito M, Munoz Gomariz E. et al. Mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2797-805
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 He Q, Zheng L, Zhuang D. et al. Surgical treatment of gynecomastia by vacuum-assisted biopsy device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21: 431-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Tu LC, Tung KY, Chen HC. et al. Eccentric mastectomy and zigzag periareolar incision for gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 549-54
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 van Deventer PV. The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28: 393-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Fagerlund A, Lewin R, Rufolo G. et al. Gynecomastia: a systematic review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49: 311-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E. et al. Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 597-602
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nuttall FQ. Gynecomastia. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85: 961-2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Handschin AE, Bietry D, Husler R. et al. Surgical management of gynecomastia: a 10-year analysis. World J Surg 2008; 32: 38-44
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Hammond DC, Arnold JF, Simon AM. et al. Combined use of ultrasonic liposuction with the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 891-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Maruccia M, Di Taranto G, Onesti MG. One-stage muscle-sparing breast reconstruction in elderly patients: a new tool for retaining excellent quality of life. Breast J 2018; 24: 180-3
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Inserra I, Martelli C, Cipollina M. et al. Lipoaspirate fluid proteome: a preliminary investigation by LC-MS top-down/bottom-up integrated platform of a high potential biofluid in regenerative medicine. Electrophoresis 2016; 37: 1015-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar