Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022

24-01-2022 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women: A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post-Augmentation.

Authors: Danika Jurat, Dorian Wenzel

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast augmentation is the most common cosmetic, surgical procedure (1). Implant insertion planes include subglandular or submuscular. Submuscular augmentation is often preferred in women with less soft tissue coverage; requiring pectoralis major dissection (2). However, loss of functional muscle fibres is undesirable in athletic women who actively train the pectoral region.

Objectives

1.
Assessment of pectoralis function and strength after breast augmentation in athletic women.
 
2.
Augmentation aesthetical satisfaction at rest and whilst training.
 

Methods

A retrospective survey was sent to female, fitness competitors with breast implants via social media over a six-month period. The survey assessed baseline demographics, pectoral strength (bench press, push-ups, pectoral fly), aesthetical satisfaction and issues during training including pain, rippling, firmness and implant movement.

Results

Eighty-one participants were surveyed. The mean age of augmentation was 29.7 (±8.41), and mean age of survey completion was 37.6 (±7.22) years. Submuscular augmentation was performed in 72.8% of participants. Recovery post-operative and time spent training was synonymous. The majority of participants’ pectoral strength was unaffected or positively affected by breast augmentation. Assessment of post-operative performance and training issues of pain, rippling and firmness yielded no statistically significant difference between groups. Implant movement during pectoral exercises was 2.5 times more likely with submuscular augmentations, p= 0.038. Overall, the majority of the population were very satisfied or satisfied with their breast aesthetic at rest (92.6%) and during training (79.0%).

Conclusions

Breast augmentation in athletic women has a high satisfaction rate with the majority maintaining or improving the strength of the pectoral region regardless of augmentation plane.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://​www.​springer.​com/​journal/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Schwartz M (2017) Evidence-based medicine: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):109–119CrossRef Schwartz M (2017) Evidence-based medicine: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):109–119CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hidalgo D (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2202–2216CrossRef Hidalgo D (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(6):2202–2216CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vazquez B (1987) Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:101–105CrossRef Vazquez B (1987) Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:101–105CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Solvi A (2010) Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(4):673–680CrossRef Solvi A (2010) Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(4):673–680CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kaslow F (1992) Breast Augmentation: psychological and plastic surgery considerations. Psychotherapy 29(3):467–473CrossRef Kaslow F (1992) Breast Augmentation: psychological and plastic surgery considerations. Psychotherapy 29(3):467–473CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kais K (2004) Cognitive and somatic anxiety and self-confidence in athletic performance of beach volleyball. Percept Mot Skills 98(2):439–449CrossRef Kais K (2004) Cognitive and somatic anxiety and self-confidence in athletic performance of beach volleyball. Percept Mot Skills 98(2):439–449CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mahoney M psychological skills and exceptional athletic performance. sport psychol 1(3):181–199 Mahoney M psychological skills and exceptional athletic performance. sport psychol 1(3):181–199
9.
go back to reference Sarbak J (2004) Effects of breast augmentation on pectoralis major muscle function in the athletic woman. Aesthet Surg J 24(3):224–228CrossRef Sarbak J (2004) Effects of breast augmentation on pectoralis major muscle function in the athletic woman. Aesthet Surg J 24(3):224–228CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roxo A (2017) Functional and volumetric analysis of the pectoralis major muscle after submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 37(6):654–661PubMed Roxo A (2017) Functional and volumetric analysis of the pectoralis major muscle after submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 37(6):654–661PubMed
11.
go back to reference Beals S Strength performance of the pectoralis major muscle after subpectoral breast augmentation surgery. Aesthet Surg J 23(2):92–97 Beals S Strength performance of the pectoralis major muscle after subpectoral breast augmentation surgery. Aesthet Surg J 23(2):92–97
Metadata
Title
Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women: A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post-Augmentation.
Authors
Danika Jurat
Dorian Wenzel
Publication date
24-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02692-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue