Published in:
01-12-2011 | Original Research Article
Is There a Predictive Profile for Clinical Inertia in Hypertensive Patients?
An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Multicentre Study
Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 12/2011
Login to get accessAbstract
Background: Some studies have described a large number of hypertensive patients who are followed by a primary care physician without achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control but whose treatment nevertheless is not intensified. It is not known whether physicians are aware of this clinical inertia and what factors are associated with this problem.
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the factors associated with clinical inertia in hypertensive patients.
Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study conducted in a network of primary care centres and hospital hypertension units in Spain. Using a consecutive sampling approach, 512 physicians selected 5077 hypertensive patients in whom they suspected poor BP control after chart review. The main variables documented were BP control and cardiovascular risk according to European Society of Hypertension guidelines, changes in treatment after visit, type of treatment, and healthcare setting. A binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis, adjusted for physician, was performed.
Results: Of the selected patients, 70.9% had poor BP control according to measurements taken in the physician’s office, and in 1499 (42.1%) of those poorly controlled patients, treatment was not intensified (clinical inertia). Factors associated with clinical inertia were as follows: being seen at a primary care centre (p<0.001), not having left ventricular hypertrophy (p<0.001) or microalbuminuria (p<0.001), taking fixed-dose (p=0.049) or free-dose (p=0.001) combination therapy, BP measured in other settings (nurse’s office, patient’s home) than the physician’s office (p=0.034) or the pharmacy (p=0.019), older age (p=0.032), and lower systolic (p<0.001) and diastolic (p<0.001) BP. Of the hypertensive patients with clinical inertia, 90.2% (95% CI 88.7, 91.7) had high cardiovascular risk.
Conclusions: Clinical inertia was associated with a profile that included older age, lack of co-morbid conditions and being seen at a primary care centre.