Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022

18-07-2022 | Melanoma | Melanoma

Educational Review: Neoadjuvant Approaches to Melanoma

Authors: Cimarron E. Sharon, MD, Giorgos C. Karakousis, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the development of novel systemic therapies, the treatment of patients with melanoma has changed drastically over the past few years, especially with regard to neoadjuvant treatments. Standard of care for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma traditionally consisted of surgery, with possible adjuvant treatment. However, there have been promising improvements in patient outcomes with neoadjuvant treatment compared to upfront surgery, specifically with targeted and immune therapies.

Methods

A review of clinical trials in the neoadjuvant treatment of stage III/IV melanoma was performed.

Results

Multiple phase I-II clinical trials have investigated the utility of interferon, targeted therapies (i.e., BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors) in the treatment of resectable clinical stage III/IV melanoma. Large strides have been made with regards to optimal treatment strategy and dosing, to maximize clinical and pathologic response rates while minimizing toxicities. Additionally, complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapies translates to a disease-free survival benefit. Current and future directions include individualizing surgical and adjuvant therapy based on patient response to neoadjuvant treatments.

Conclusions

The current evidence, represented by small phase I-II trials, demonstrates advantages to neoadjuvant treatment with targeted or immune therapy for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma. Future research is needed to determine the advantages of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant treatment, and to further refine treatment strategies based on patient response.
Literature
29.
go back to reference Blank CU, Reijers ILM, Pennington T, Versluis JM, Saw Blank CU, Reijers ILM, Pennington T, Versluis JM, Saw
31.
go back to reference Blank C, Irene L, Reijers R, et al. Survival data of PRADO: A phase 2 study of personalized response-driven surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in resectable stage III mealnoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;25:9501.CrossRef Blank C, Irene L, Reijers R, et al. Survival data of PRADO: A phase 2 study of personalized response-driven surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in resectable stage III mealnoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;25:9501.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Versus Standard Adjuvant Nivolumab in Macroscopic Stage III Melanoma (NADINA). 2021. Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Versus Standard Adjuvant Nivolumab in Macroscopic Stage III Melanoma (NADINA). 2021.
36.
go back to reference A Study to Compare the Administration of Pembrolizumab After Surgery Versus Administration Both Before and After Surgery for High-Risk Melanoma. 2018. A Study to Compare the Administration of Pembrolizumab After Surgery Versus Administration Both Before and After Surgery for High-Risk Melanoma. 2018.
Metadata
Title
Educational Review: Neoadjuvant Approaches to Melanoma
Authors
Cimarron E. Sharon, MD
Giorgos C. Karakousis, MD
Publication date
18-07-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2022
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12224-6

Other articles of this Issue 13/2022

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022 Go to the issue