Appendiceal Incidentalomas: Prevalence, Radiographic Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes

Radiographically detected incidental appendiceal abnormalities, in this report termed “appendiceal incidentalomas” (AIs), are an ill-defined entity with an unknown prevalence of neoplasm. This study aimed to describe the prevalence, radiographic characteristics, and outcomes of patients with a diagnosis of AI.

The study reviewed the electronic health records for patients at a single institution undergoing abdominopelvic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 2000 to 2020 for non-appendix-related complaints with mention of appendix abnormality in the radiology report. The suggested diagnosis at the index imaging was recorded. Outcomes were compared between the operative and non-operative patients.

Of 5197 records, 484 were identified as reports of AIs (9 % of screened patients). Neoplasms were suggested radiographically in 16 % (n = 79) of the records, 59 % (47/79) of which were resected. Pathologically, 32 of the abnormalities were confirmed as neoplasms, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 68 %. Compared with the non-operative patients, the operative patients had AIs with a larger mean diameter (22.7 ± 13.0 vs. 17.8 ±7.7 mm; p = 0.04), a higher colonoscopy rate (51 % vs. 22 %; p = 0.01), and diagnosis at a younger age (55.8 ± 15.6 vs. 67.2 ± 16.0 years; p = 0.003). The postoperative complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2) in 26 % and major (grades 3–5) in 4 % of the cases. During a median follow-up period of 28.3 months, 94 % of the patients were alive without disease, and 6 % died of other causes. The 32 non-operative suggested neoplastic AIs had a median follow-up period of 20.9 months. At this writing, 59 % of the operative patients are alive with a stable abnormal appendix, 13 % had no appendix abnormality at last follow-up visit, and 28 % have died of other causes.

Neoplastic AIs are an uncommon finding and radiographically diagnosed with relatively high accuracy. Larger appendiceal diameter and younger age predict operative intervention. Although surgery is associated with favorable outcomes and minimal risk of postoperative complications, observation of suspected neoplastic AIs may be a safe alternative for select patients undergoing follow-up longitudinal imaging.