Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Mastectomy | Reconstructive Oncology

Development of a Classification Tree to Predict Implant-Based Reconstruction Failure with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

Authors: Jie Jane Chen, MD, Rie von Eyben, MS, Paulina M. Gutkin, BS, Erin Hawley, BA, Frederick M. Dirbas, MD, Gordon K. Lee, MD, Kathleen C. Horst, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the complications, incidence, and predictors of implant-based reconstruction failure (RF) among patients treated with mastectomy for breast cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who underwent mastectomy, tissue expander, and implant-based breast reconstruction with or without radiation therapy (RT) at our institution (2000–2014). Descriptive statistics determined complication incidences, with major complications defined as any complications requiring surgical intervention or inpatient management. Chi square and Fisher’s exact tests determined differences in RF incidences, defined as implant loss. Logistic regression analyses identified predictors of RF.

Results

Median follow-up was 42.5 months. Sixty patients (55.6%) experienced major complications. Overall, 27 patients (25%) experienced RF. Incidences of RF were significantly increased in patients who had any major complication (43.3% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.0001), especially infection (61.3% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.0001), delayed wound healing (83.3% vs. 21.7%; p = 0.004), and implant exposure (80.0% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.0002). Receiving RT, but not timing of RT, significantly predicted RF [odds ratio (OR) 4.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–14.47; p = 0.03]. On multivariable analysis, infection (OR 7.69, 95% CI 2.12–27.89; p = 0.002) and delayed wound healing (OR 17.86, 95% CI 1.59–200.48; p = 0.02) independently predicted for RF. Our newly developed classification tree, which includes stepwise assessment of major infection, delayed wound healing, implant exposure, age ≥ 50 years, and total number of lymph nodes removed ≥ 10, accurately predicted 74% of RF events and 75% of non-RF events.

Conclusions

Infection or delayed wound healing requiring surgical intervention or hospitalization and receipt of RT, but not radiation timing, were significant predictors of RF. Our classification tree demonstrated > 70% accuracy for stepwise prediction of RF.
Literature
35.
go back to reference Da Costa Vieira RA, Ribeiro LM, Carrara GFA, Abrahão-Machado LF, Kerr LM, Nazário ACP. Effectiveness and Safety of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: A Matched Case-Control Study. Breast Care. 2019;14(4):200–210. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496429CrossRef Da Costa Vieira RA, Ribeiro LM, Carrara GFA, Abrahão-Machado LF, Kerr LM, Nazário ACP. Effectiveness and Safety of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma: A Matched Case-Control Study. Breast Care. 2019;14(4):200–210. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000496429CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a Classification Tree to Predict Implant-Based Reconstruction Failure with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer
Authors
Jie Jane Chen, MD
Rie von Eyben, MS
Paulina M. Gutkin, BS
Erin Hawley, BA
Frederick M. Dirbas, MD
Gordon K. Lee, MD
Kathleen C. Horst, MD
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09068-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021 Go to the issue