Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Metastasis | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?

Authors: Kota Sahara, MD, Diamantis I. Tsilimigras, MD, Katiuscha Merath, MD, Fabio Bagante, MD, Alfredo Guglielmi, MD, Luca Aldrighetti, MD, Matthew Weiss, MD, Todd W. Bauer, MD, Sorin Alexandrescu, MD, George A. Poultsides, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD, Hugo P. Marques, MD, Guillaume Martel, MD, Carlo Pulitano, MD, Feng Shen, MD, Olivier Soubrane, MD, B. Groot Koerkamp, MD, Ryusei Matsuyama, MD, PhD, Itaru Endo, MD, PhD, Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup.

Results

Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–8] and 0 (IQR 0–1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1–2 (4.1) vs. 3–6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)].

Conclusion

The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chang KY, Chang JY, Yen Y. Increasing incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its relationship to chronic viral hepatitis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2009;7(4):423–7.CrossRef Chang KY, Chang JY, Yen Y. Increasing incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its relationship to chronic viral hepatitis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2009;7(4):423–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Amini N, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Temporal trends in liver-directed therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(2):163–70.CrossRefPubMed Amini N, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Temporal trends in liver-directed therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(2):163–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Taylor-Robinson SD, Foster GR, Arora S, Hargreaves S, Thomas HC. Increase in primary liver cancer in the UK, 1979–94. The Lancet. 1997;350(9085):1142–3.CrossRef Taylor-Robinson SD, Foster GR, Arora S, Hargreaves S, Thomas HC. Increase in primary liver cancer in the UK, 1979–94. The Lancet. 1997;350(9085):1142–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shirabe K, Shimada M, Harimoto N, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Its mode of spreading and therapeutic modalities. Surgery. 2002;131(1 Suppl 1):S159–S164.CrossRefPubMed Shirabe K, Shimada M, Harimoto N, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Its mode of spreading and therapeutic modalities. Surgery. 2002;131(1 Suppl 1):S159–S164.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shen WF, Zhong W, Xu F, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of 429 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(47):5976–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shen WF, Zhong W, Xu F, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of 429 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(47):5976–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):565–74.CrossRefPubMed Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):565–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim DH, Choi DW, Choi SH, Heo JS, Kow AW. Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution. Surgery. 2015;157(4):666–75.CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Choi DW, Choi SH, Heo JS, Kow AW. Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution. Surgery. 2015;157(4):666–75.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sano T, Nara S, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma with negative lymph node involvement. Surgery. 2009;145(4):411–6.CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sano T, Nara S, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma with negative lymph node involvement. Surgery. 2009;145(4):411–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3140–5.CrossRef de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3140–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):84–96.CrossRef Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):84–96.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Luo X, Yuan L, Wang Y, Ge R, Sun Y, Wei G. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):562–72.CrossRefPubMed Luo X, Yuan L, Wang Y, Ge R, Sun Y, Wei G. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):562–72.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Amini N, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Maithel SK, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Management of lymph nodes during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(12):2136–48.CrossRef Amini N, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Maithel SK, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Management of lymph nodes during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(12):2136–48.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bagante F, Gani F, Spolverato G, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(6):1031–1040. e1031–1034.CrossRefPubMed Bagante F, Gani F, Spolverato G, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(6):1031–1040. e1031–1034.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Hoen HM, et al. Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database. HPB. 2016;18(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Hoen HM, et al. Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database. HPB. 2016;18(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Tokunaga MM, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Inoue H, Yamaka K, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer with macroscopic duodenum invasion: is the posterior pancreatic head lymph node dissection beneficial? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1241–6.CrossRefPubMed Tokunaga MM, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Inoue H, Yamaka K, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer with macroscopic duodenum invasion: is the posterior pancreatic head lymph node dissection beneficial? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1241–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):346–51.CrossRefPubMed Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):346–51.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, et al. Survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastric cancer patients: relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups of patients. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):172–7.CrossRefPubMed Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, et al. Survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastric cancer patients: relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups of patients. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):172–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lin J-X, Huang C-M, Zheng C-H, et al. Is all advanced gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case–control study using a propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1252–60.CrossRefPubMed Lin J-X, Huang C-M, Zheng C-H, et al. Is all advanced gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case–control study using a propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1252–60.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):80–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):80–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Aiko T, Sasako M. The new Japanese Classification of gastric carcinoma: points to be revised. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed Aiko T, Sasako M. The new Japanese Classification of gastric carcinoma: points to be revised. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351–5.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9.CrossRefPubMed Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bhanji F, Topjian AA, Nadkarni VM, et al. Survival rates following pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests during nights and weekends. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhanji F, Topjian AA, Nadkarni VM, et al. Survival rates following pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests during nights and weekends. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(1):39–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Clark CJ, Wood-Wentz CM, Reid-Lombardo KM, Kendrick ML, Huebner M, Que FG. Lymphadenectomy in the staging and treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study using the National Cancer Institute SEER database. HPB. 2011;13(9):612–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clark CJ, Wood-Wentz CM, Reid-Lombardo KM, Kendrick ML, Huebner M, Que FG. Lymphadenectomy in the staging and treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study using the National Cancer Institute SEER database. HPB. 2011;13(9):612–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Chen Q, Kimbrough CW, et al. Lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: has nodal evaluation been increasingly adopted by surgeons over time? A National Database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(4):668–75.CrossRefPubMed Zhang XF, Chen Q, Kimbrough CW, et al. Lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: has nodal evaluation been increasingly adopted by surgeons over time? A National Database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(4):668–75.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hu J, Chen F-Y, Zhou K-Q, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients without indications of lymph node metastasis not benefit from lymph node dissection. Oncotarget. 2017;8(69):113817–27.PubMedPubMedCentral Hu J, Chen F-Y, Zhou K-Q, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients without indications of lymph node metastasis not benefit from lymph node dissection. Oncotarget. 2017;8(69):113817–27.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Choi SB, Kim KS, Choi JY, et al. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3048–56.CrossRefPubMed Choi SB, Kim KS, Choi JY, et al. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3048–56.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Morita K, et al. The impact of surgical treatment and poor prognostic factors for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 60 patients. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(4c):2353–9.PubMed Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Morita K, et al. The impact of surgical treatment and poor prognostic factors for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 60 patients. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(4c):2353–9.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Morine Y, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Clinical impact of lymph node dissection in surgery for peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2012;42(2):147–51.CrossRefPubMed Morine Y, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Clinical impact of lymph node dissection in surgery for peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2012;42(2):147–51.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bagante F, Spolverato G, Weiss M, et al. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: impact of lymphadenectomy on peri-operative outcomes. World J Surg. 2018;42(8):2551–60.CrossRefPubMed Bagante F, Spolverato G, Weiss M, et al. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: impact of lymphadenectomy on peri-operative outcomes. World J Surg. 2018;42(8):2551–60.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T. Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;29(3):147–50.CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T. Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;29(3):147–50.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73.CrossRefPubMed Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(8):658–67.CrossRefPubMed Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(8):658–67.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
Authors
Kota Sahara, MD
Diamantis I. Tsilimigras, MD
Katiuscha Merath, MD
Fabio Bagante, MD
Alfredo Guglielmi, MD
Luca Aldrighetti, MD
Matthew Weiss, MD
Todd W. Bauer, MD
Sorin Alexandrescu, MD
George A. Poultsides, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Hugo P. Marques, MD
Guillaume Martel, MD
Carlo Pulitano, MD
Feng Shen, MD
Olivier Soubrane, MD
B. Groot Koerkamp, MD
Ryusei Matsuyama, MD, PhD
Itaru Endo, MD, PhD
Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD, FACS
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Go to the issue

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Trends in Volume–Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas