Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Neuroendocrine Tumor | Endocrine Tumors

Outcomes of Lymph Node Dissection for Non-metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Authors: Rui Mao, MD, Hong Zhao, MD, Kan Li, PhD, Sheng Luo, PhD, Megan Turner, MD, Jian-Qiang Cai, MD, Dan Blazer III, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend use of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) > 2 cm, there is limited evidence to support the association between use of LND and overall survival (OS).

Methods

Patients with resected pNETs were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004–2014). The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS of patients in different treatment groups.

Results

A total of 2664 patients diagnosed met the study entry criteria. Of these, 2132 patients (80.6%) received LND, with a median of nine nodes removed. Positive nodes were identified in 28.0% of patients who underwent LND. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that median OS was similar between the LND and LND-omitted groups (152.8 vs. 147.3 months; p = 0.61). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, LND was not associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.42; p = 0.18). The results were consistent across subgroups stratified by clinical T and N stages. Among patients with lymph node metastasis, the number of removed nodes (NRN) above the median was not associated with an improved OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60–1.13; p = 0.22).

Conclusions

LND had no additional therapeutic benefit among patients undergoing resection for pNETs. The present findings should be considered when managing patients with resectable pNETs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):1335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):1335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Hashim YM, Trinkaus KM, Linehan DC, et al. Regional lymph node dissection is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMed Hashim YM, Trinkaus KM, Linehan DC, et al. Regional lymph node dissection is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):197–203.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tomassetti P, Campana D, Piscitelli L, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumors: factors correlated with survival. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16:1806–10.CrossRefPubMed Tomassetti P, Campana D, Piscitelli L, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumors: factors correlated with survival. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16:1806–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bettini R, Boninsegna L, Mantovani W, et al. Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19:903–8.CrossRefPubMed Bettini R, Boninsegna L, Mantovani W, et al. Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19:903–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, et al. Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg. 2008; 247:490–500.CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, et al. Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg. 2008; 247:490–500.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kazanjian KK, Reber HA, Hines OJ. Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of 70 cases. Arch Surg. 2006; 141:765–69.CrossRefPubMed Kazanjian KK, Reber HA, Hines OJ. Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of 70 cases. Arch Surg. 2006; 141:765–69.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ellison TA, Wolfgang CL, Shi C, et al. A single institution’s 26-year experience with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a validation of current staging systems and a new prognostic nomogram. Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):204–12.CrossRefPubMed Ellison TA, Wolfgang CL, Shi C, et al. A single institution’s 26-year experience with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a validation of current staging systems and a new prognostic nomogram. Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):204–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. 2007;451(4):757–62. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. 2007;451(4):757–62.
11.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Neuroendocrine Tumors. Version 3.2018. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Neuroendocrine Tumors. Version 3.2018.
12.
go back to reference Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013; 42(4):557–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013; 42(4):557–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993;341(8843):457–60.CrossRefPubMed MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993;341(8843):457–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439–49.CrossRefPubMed Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439–49.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, et al. Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(11):3515–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, et al. Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(11):3515–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kuo EJ, Salem RR. Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;9:2815–2821.CrossRef Kuo EJ, Salem RR. Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;9:2815–2821.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tsutsumi K, Ohtsuka T, Mori Y, et al. Analysis of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) based on the tumor size and hormonal production. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):678–85.CrossRefPubMed Tsutsumi K, Ohtsuka T, Mori Y, et al. Analysis of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) based on the tumor size and hormonal production. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):678–85.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, et al. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(10):764–77.CrossRefPubMed Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, et al. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(10):764–77.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chu QD, Hill HC, Douglass HO Jr, et al. Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(9):855–62.CrossRefPubMed Chu QD, Hill HC, Douglass HO Jr, et al. Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(9):855–62.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Tang LH, Tomlinson J, et al. Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: can the WHO classification system be simplified? J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(35):5609–15.CrossRefPubMed Ferrone CR, Tang LH, Tomlinson J, et al. Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: can the WHO classification system be simplified? J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(35):5609–15.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ito H, Abramson M, Ito K, et al. Surgery and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(5):891–8.CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Abramson M, Ito K, et al. Surgery and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(5):891–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Parekh JR, Wang SC, Bergsland EK, et al. Lymph node sampling rates and predictors of nodal metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resections: the UCSF experience with 149 patients. Pancreas. 2012;41(6):840–4.CrossRefPubMed Parekh JR, Wang SC, Bergsland EK, et al. Lymph node sampling rates and predictors of nodal metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resections: the UCSF experience with 149 patients. Pancreas. 2012;41(6):840–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sallinen VJ, Le Large TTY, Tieftrunk E, et al. Prognosis of sporadic resected small (≤ 2 cm) nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a multi-institutional study. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(3):251–59.CrossRef Sallinen VJ, Le Large TTY, Tieftrunk E, et al. Prognosis of sporadic resected small (≤ 2 cm) nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a multi-institutional study. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(3):251–59.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Luo G, Javed A, Strosberg JR, et al. Modified staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on the basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Systems. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(3):274–80.CrossRefPubMed Luo G, Javed A, Strosberg JR, et al. Modified staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on the basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Systems. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(3):274–80.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. Ninety-day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1071–8.CrossRefPubMed Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. Ninety-day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1071–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley; 2004. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley; 2004.
28.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual (7th ed). New York, NY: Springer; 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual (7th ed). New York, NY: Springer; 2010.
29.
go back to reference Mizumoto T, Toyama H, Terai S, et al. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by contrast enhancement characteristics. Pancreatology. 2017;17(6): 956–61.CrossRefPubMed Mizumoto T, Toyama H, Terai S, et al. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by contrast enhancement characteristics. Pancreatology. 2017;17(6): 956–61.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, et al. Computed tomography features predictive of lymph node involvement in patients with a nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Pancreas. 2017; 46(8):1056–63.CrossRefPubMed Choi SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, et al. Computed tomography features predictive of lymph node involvement in patients with a nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Pancreas. 2017; 46(8):1056–63.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al. Prospective study of 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and unknown primary sites. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):588–96.CrossRefPubMed Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al. Prospective study of 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and unknown primary sites. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):588–96.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Angelousi A, Kaltsas G, Koumarianou A, et al. Chemotherapy in NETs: when and how. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18(4):485–97.CrossRefPubMed Angelousi A, Kaltsas G, Koumarianou A, et al. Chemotherapy in NETs: when and how. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18(4):485–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of Lymph Node Dissection for Non-metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the National Cancer Database
Authors
Rui Mao, MD
Hong Zhao, MD
Kan Li, PhD
Sheng Luo, PhD
Megan Turner, MD
Jian-Qiang Cai, MD
Dan Blazer III, MD
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07506-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Go to the issue