Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Gastrectomy | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Diagnostic Accuracy and Usefulness of Intraoperative Margin Assessment by Frozen Section in Gastric Cancer

Authors: Koki Nakanishi, MD, Shinji Morita, MD, Hirokazu Taniguchi, MD, Sho Otsuki, MD, Takeo Fukagawa, MD, Hitoshi Katai, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative frozen examination is clinically important for negative margin confirmation in cancer surgery. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of frozen-section assessment and risk factors for positive resection margins by studying gastric cancer specimens from 1115 patients treated at our hospital.

Methods

The results of gastric cancer patients who had undergone intraoperative margin assessment, employing frozen examination, with curative intent in our unit between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Frozen section assessments were compared with the corresponding permanent section assessments to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the former. The causes of discordances between two assessments were examined. In addition, risk factors associated with positive margins were identified.

Results

In total, 1241 specimens were obtained from the 1115 patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of frozen-section assessments were 99.4%, 99.5%, and 97.8%, respectively. There were eight discordant cases. Two false-negative cases required another gastrectomy after final pathological diagnosis because of missed neoplastic cells. Six false-positive cases underwent unnecessary additional resection due to false positive results. In our frozen series, 89 cases had a positive margin on permanent section. Multivariate regression analysis of patients with positive surgical margins revealed large diameter (≥ 50 mm) and T4 tumor to be independent risk factors.

Conclusions

Intraoperative frozen examination is a highly accurate method that is useful for achieving negative margins. This procedure is especially recommended for patients with a tumor larger than 50 mm in maximum diameter or serosal invasion to confirm a negative margin.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2738–43.CrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2738–43.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN, et al. Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3028–37.CrossRefPubMed Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN, et al. Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3028–37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1–19.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1–19.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spicer J, Benay C, Lee L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2580–6.CrossRefPubMed Spicer J, Benay C, Lee L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2580–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Intraoperative frozen section margin evaluation in gastric cancer of the cardia surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53(72):976–8.PubMed Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Intraoperative frozen section margin evaluation in gastric cancer of the cardia surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53(72):976–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Squires MH, 3rd, Kooby DA, Pawlik TM, et al. Utility of the proximal margin frozen section for resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(13):4202–10.CrossRefPubMed Squires MH, 3rd, Kooby DA, Pawlik TM, et al. Utility of the proximal margin frozen section for resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(13):4202–10.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sobin LH GM, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. 2009. Sobin LH GM, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. 2009.
9.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edn. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):101–12.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edn. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):101–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Younes M. Frozen section of the gastrointestinal tract, appendix, and peritoneum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(12):1558–64.PubMed Younes M. Frozen section of the gastrointestinal tract, appendix, and peritoneum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(12):1558–64.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2663–8.CrossRefPubMed Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2663–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Postlewait LM, Maithel SK. The importance of surgical margins in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMed Postlewait LM, Maithel SK. The importance of surgical margins in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Postlewait LM, Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA, et al. The importance of the proximal resection margin distance for proximal gastric adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(2):203–7.CrossRefPubMed Postlewait LM, Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA, et al. The importance of the proximal resection margin distance for proximal gastric adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(2):203–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic Accuracy and Usefulness of Intraoperative Margin Assessment by Frozen Section in Gastric Cancer
Authors
Koki Nakanishi, MD
Shinji Morita, MD
Hirokazu Taniguchi, MD
Sho Otsuki, MD
Takeo Fukagawa, MD
Hitoshi Katai, MD
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07302-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019 Go to the issue