Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Prognostic Significance of Microscopic Positive Margins for Gastric Cancer Patients with Potentially Curative Resection

Authors: Zhe Sun, MD, De-ming Li, MD, Zhen-ning Wang, MD, Bao-jun Huang, MD, Yan Xu, MD, Kai Li, MD, Hui-mian Xu, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Most previous studies concerning the impact of positive margins on patient outcomes were based on patients with D1 lymphadenectomy. The prognostic significance of positive margins for patients with D2/D3 lymphadenectomy has not been investigated.

Methods

Clinicopathologic and prognostic data were compared between 110 patients with positive margins and 2,159 patients with negative margins who underwent R0 surgery (D2/D3 lymphadenectomy). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent factors correlated with positive margins. Cox’s proportional hazard model was applied to investigate whether a positive margin was an independent factor predicting poor outcome. Overall survival rates and the incidence of recurrence were compared between patients with positive and negative margins, stratifying by pT, pN, and TNM stage.

Results

Tumor size, pT stage, and pN stage were independent factors associated with positive margins. Although the overall survival rate of patients with positive margins was significantly poorer than that of patients with negative margins, margin status was not an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Significant differences in survival between patients with negative and positive margins could be observed for those in pT1-2, pN0-1, and I–II stage, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III–VI stage. Although locoregional recurrence was more frequently observed for patients with positive margins, the incidence of any recurrence was significantly higher only for patients in pT1-2, pN0-1, and I-II stage, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III–VI stage.

Conclusion

A positive margin results in a significantly worse outcome for pT1-2, pN0-1, and I–II stage gastric cancer patients who undergo D2/D3 lymphadenectomy, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III–IV stage.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Goggins WB, Wong GK. Poor survival for US Pacific Islander cancer patients: evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: 1991 to 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5738–41.CrossRefPubMed Goggins WB, Wong GK. Poor survival for US Pacific Islander cancer patients: evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: 1991 to 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5738–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–62.PubMed Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–62.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1997. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 1997.
5.
go back to reference Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, et al. Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:433–7.CrossRefPubMed Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, et al. Prognostic value of resection line involvement in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:433–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1991;68:380–4.CrossRefPubMed Kakeji Y, Tsujitani S, Baba H, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of duodenal invasion in patients with distal gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1991;68:380–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H, et al. Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1980;139:711–3.CrossRefPubMed Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H, et al. Histologically positive esophageal margin in the treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1980;139:711–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V, et al. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:291–3.CrossRefPubMed Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V, et al. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:291–3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, et al. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:24–33.CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, et al. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:24–33.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, et al. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J Surg. 2008;32:2661–7.CrossRefPubMed Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, et al. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J Surg. 2008;32:2661–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Bittcher K, Stein HJ, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.CrossRefPubMed Siewert JR, Bittcher K, Stein HJ, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg. 2005;241:27–39.PubMed Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg. 2005;241:27–39.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10,783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:125–33.CrossRefPubMed Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10,783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:125–33.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–14.CrossRefPubMed Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–14.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P, et al. Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:894–900.CrossRefPubMed Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P, et al. Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:894–900.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
17.
go back to reference Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA, et al. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1418–20.CrossRefPubMed Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA, et al. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1418–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yokota T, Sawai K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Resection margin in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal invasion: clinicopathological study. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:60–3.CrossRefPubMed Yokota T, Sawai K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Resection margin in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal invasion: clinicopathological study. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:60–3.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Park JM, Jang YJ, Kim JH, et al. Gastric cancer histology: clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic value. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:520–5.CrossRefPubMed Park JM, Jang YJ, Kim JH, et al. Gastric cancer histology: clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic value. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:520–5.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kasakura Y, Fujii M, Mochizuki F, et al. Clinicopathological features of the superficial spreading type of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:129–35.CrossRefPubMed Kasakura Y, Fujii M, Mochizuki F, et al. Clinicopathological features of the superficial spreading type of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:129–35.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rosenberg R, Nekarda H, Bauer P, et al. Free peritoneal tumour cells are an independent prognostic factor in curatively resected stage IB gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:325–31.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg R, Nekarda H, Bauer P, et al. Free peritoneal tumour cells are an independent prognostic factor in curatively resected stage IB gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:325–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Majima T, Ichikura T, Mochizuki H. Prognostic significance of the cytologic features of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2002;32:35–9.CrossRefPubMed Majima T, Ichikura T, Mochizuki H. Prognostic significance of the cytologic features of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2002;32:35–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Ochiai T, Hayashi H, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology findings as prognostic factor for gastric cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;17:103–7.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki T, Ochiai T, Hayashi H, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology findings as prognostic factor for gastric cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;17:103–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Maehara Y, Hasuda S, Koga T, et al. Postoperative outcome and sites of recurrence in patients following curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:353–7.CrossRefPubMed Maehara Y, Hasuda S, Koga T, et al. Postoperative outcome and sites of recurrence in patients following curative resection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:353–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2002;235:499–506.CrossRefPubMed Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2002;235:499–506.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–14.CrossRefPubMed Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P, et al. Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:894–900.CrossRefPubMed Roviello F, Marrelli D, Morgagni P, et al. Survival benefit of extended D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with involvement of second level lymph nodes: a longitudinal multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:894–900.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Stage migration influences on stage-specific survival comparison between D1 and D3 gastric cancer surgeries. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:153–7.CrossRefPubMed Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, et al. Stage migration influences on stage-specific survival comparison between D1 and D3 gastric cancer surgeries. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:153–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Significance of Microscopic Positive Margins for Gastric Cancer Patients with Potentially Curative Resection
Authors
Zhe Sun, MD
De-ming Li, MD
Zhen-ning Wang, MD
Bao-jun Huang, MD
Yan Xu, MD
Kai Li, MD
Hui-mian Xu, MD
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0624-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2009 Go to the issue