Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Breast Oncology

The Effect of Hospital Volume on the Outcome of Breast Cancer Surgery

Authors: P. Peltoniemi, MD, M. Peltola, MSc, T. Hakulinen, DSc, U. Häkkinen, DSc, L. Pylkkänen, MD, PhD, K. Holli, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to investigate whether annual surgical unit caseload affects extent of breast cancer surgery, breast cancer recurrence or breast cancer-specific survival.

Methods

In a population-based cohort study, 12,604 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Finland during the years 1998–2001 were followed up until the end of year 2008. Surgical units were divided into subgroups: >200, 100–200, 50–99 or <50 breast cancer operations per year. Information on patients, treatment, and follow-up was obtained from two national registries. The analyses were adjusted for age and disease stage. The reliability of the registry information was validated by comparison with information from one hospital area. Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were employed in the analyses.

Results

Validation of the registry data showed that date of diagnosis, age, stage, extent of surgery, and date and cause of death were reliably recorded in the registers. Information on radiotherapy was obtained by combining different registry data. Data on local and distant recurrences were not reliable enough to allow analyses. Patients in hospitals with smaller caseloads underwent mastectomy more often than those operated in hospitals with higher caseloads (P < 0.001). Higher caseloads were also related to improved survival (P = 0.031).

Conclusions

National registries should include information on both local and distant recurrences in order to provide reliable population-based data for evaluation of treatment results. Centralization of surgery to high-volume centers is supported by a higher incidence of conservative surgery and better survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–53.PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:546–53.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nattinger A, Laud P, Sparapani R, Zhang X, Neuner J, Gilligan M. Exploring the surgeon volume-outcome relationship among women with breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2007;18:1958–63.CrossRef Nattinger A, Laud P, Sparapani R, Zhang X, Neuner J, Gilligan M. Exploring the surgeon volume-outcome relationship among women with breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2007;18:1958–63.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Harcourt KF, Hicks KL. Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2003;185:407–10.PubMedCrossRef Harcourt KF, Hicks KL. Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer? Am J Surg. 2003;185:407–10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stefoski M, Haward RA, Johnston C, Sainsbury R, Forman D. Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:487–91.CrossRef Stefoski M, Haward RA, Johnston C, Sainsbury R, Forman D. Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:487–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kingsmore D, Hole D, Gillis C. Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1920–5.PubMedCrossRef Kingsmore D, Hole D, Gillis C. Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1920–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J, Latreille J, Pineault R. Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:1343–8.PubMedCrossRef Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J, Latreille J, Pineault R. Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:1343–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Richards M, Sainsbury R, Kerr D. Inequalities in breast cancer care and outcome. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:634–8.PubMedCrossRef Richards M, Sainsbury R, Kerr D. Inequalities in breast cancer care and outcome. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:634–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sainsbury R, Haward B. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 1995;345:1265–70.PubMedCrossRef Sainsbury R, Haward B. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 1995;345:1265–70.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Finnish Cancer Registry. Cancer in Finland 2006 and 2007. Cancer Society of Finland Publ No 76. Helsinki; 2009. Finnish Cancer Registry. Cancer in Finland 2006 and 2007. Cancer Society of Finland Publ No 76. Helsinki; 2009.
12.
go back to reference Lee-Feldstein A, Anton-Culver H, Feldstein PJ. Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA. 1994;271:1163–8.PubMedCrossRef Lee-Feldstein A, Anton-Culver H, Feldstein PJ. Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA. 1994;271:1163–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Allgood PC, Bachmann MO. Effects of specialization on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:36–42.PubMedCrossRef Allgood PC, Bachmann MO. Effects of specialization on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:36–42.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Houssami N, Sainsbury R. Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2480–91.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Sainsbury R. Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2480–91.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D, Ye W, Sposto R. Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:606–15.PubMedCrossRef Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D, Ye W, Sposto R. Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:606–15.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL. Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:454–7.PubMedCrossRef Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL. Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:454–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Golledge J, Wiggins JE, Callam MJ. Effect of surgical subspecialization on breast cancer outcome. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1420–5.PubMedCrossRef Golledge J, Wiggins JE, Callam MJ. Effect of surgical subspecialization on breast cancer outcome. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1420–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gillis CR, Hole DJ. Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1996;312:145–8.PubMed Gillis CR, Hole DJ. Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1996;312:145–8.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Guller U, Safford S, Pietrobon R, Heberer M, Oertli D, Jain NB. High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery. Analysis of 233,247 patients. World J Surg. 2005;29:994–9.PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Safford S, Pietrobon R, Heberer M, Oertli D, Jain NB. High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery. Analysis of 233,247 patients. World J Surg. 2005;29:994–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Neuner JM, Gilligan MA, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Haggstrom D, Nattinger AB. Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States. Cancer. 2004;101:1323–9.PubMedCrossRef Neuner JM, Gilligan MA, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Haggstrom D, Nattinger AB. Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States. Cancer. 2004;101:1323–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibiliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008;27:32.PubMedCrossRef Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibiliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008;27:32.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Hospital Volume on the Outcome of Breast Cancer Surgery
Authors
P. Peltoniemi, MD
M. Peltola, MSc
T. Hakulinen, DSc
U. Häkkinen, DSc
L. Pylkkänen, MD, PhD
K. Holli, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1514-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2011 Go to the issue