Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2007

01-01-2007

Pancreatic Resection for M1 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Shailesh V. Shrikhande, MD, Jörg Kleeff, MD, Carolin Reiser, MD, Jürgen Weitz, MD, Ulf Hinz, MSc, Irene Esposito, MD, Jan Schmidt, MD, Helmut Friess, MD, Markus W. Büchler, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improved safety of pancreatic surgery has led to consideration of more aggressive approaches, such as resection for primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with metastatic disease (M1).

Methods

A total of 29 patients who underwent pancreatic resection with resection of associated metastatic disease (interaortocaval lymph node dissection, liver resection, and/or multiorgan resections) were retrospectively identified from a database of 316 R0/R1 pancreatic resections for PDAC. An explorative data analysis of perioperative and clinicopathological parameters, and overall survival was performed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The overall in-hospital mortality and morbidity of R0/R1 pancreatic resections for M1 disease (n = 29) was 0% and 24.1%, compared with 4.2% and 35.2% of R0/R1 pancreatic resections for M0 disease (n = 287). The median overall survival time was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4–20.5), and the estimated 1-year overall survival rate was 58.9% (95% CI, 34.8–76.7) for patients with M1 disease. The median survival in those with metastatic interaortocaval lymph nodes was 27 months (95% CI, 9.6–27.0), whereas it was 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.8–16.5) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.2–20.5) for those with liver and peritoneal metastases, respectively.

Conclusions

Pancreatic resections with M1 disease can be performed with acceptable safety in highly selected patients. The survival after interaortocaval lymph node resection is comparable to that of other lymph nodes that do not constitute M1 disease. Resection of liver and peritoneal metastases, although safe in this series, cannot be generally recommended until further controlled trials can be conducted.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(Suppl 8):S4–66PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(Suppl 8):S4–66PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001; 94:153–6PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001; 94:153–6PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ozawa F, Friess H, Kunzli B, et al. Treatment of pancreatic cancer: the role of surgery. Dig Dis 2001; 19:47–56PubMedCrossRef Ozawa F, Friess H, Kunzli B, et al. Treatment of pancreatic cancer: the role of surgery. Dig Dis 2001; 19:47–56PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fernandez-del CC, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995; 130:295–9 Fernandez-del CC, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995; 130:295–9
6.
go back to reference Stojadinovic A, Hoos A, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Randomized clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002; 11:207–29PubMedCrossRef Stojadinovic A, Hoos A, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Randomized clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002; 11:207–29PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217:430–5PubMedCrossRef Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217:430–5PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990; 211:447–58PubMedCrossRef Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990; 211:447–58PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Howard JM. Development and progress in resective surgery for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 1999; 23:901–6PubMedCrossRef Howard JM. Development and progress in resective surgery for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 1999; 23:901–6PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Picozzi VJ, Kozarek RA, Traverso LW. Interferon-based adjuvant chemoradiation therapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2003; 185:476–80PubMedCrossRef Picozzi VJ, Kozarek RA, Traverso LW. Interferon-based adjuvant chemoradiation therapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2003; 185:476–80PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fortner JG. Regional pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreas, ampulla, and other related sites. Tumor staging and results. Ann Surg 1984; 199:418–25PubMedCrossRef Fortner JG. Regional pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreas, ampulla, and other related sites. Tumor staging and results. Ann Surg 1984; 199:418–25PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fortner JG. “Radical” abdominal cancer surgery: current state and future course. Jpn J Surg 1989; 19:503–9PubMedCrossRef Fortner JG. “Radical” abdominal cancer surgery: current state and future course. Jpn J Surg 1989; 19:503–9PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:946–52PubMedCrossRef Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:946–52PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999; 229:613–22PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999; 229:613–22PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, Vigano L, Muratore A, Calgaro M. Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:1316–22PubMedCrossRef Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, Vigano L, Muratore A, Calgaro M. Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:1316–22PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nguyen TC, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, et al. Standard vs. radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective, randomized trial evaluating quality of life in pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:1–9PubMedCrossRef Nguyen TC, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, et al. Standard vs. radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective, randomized trial evaluating quality of life in pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:1–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998; 228:508–17PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998; 228:508–17PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 2002; 236:355–66PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 2002; 236:355–66PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Van CE, Aerts R, Haustermans K, Topal B, Van SW, Verslype C. Systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16:265–74 Van CE, Aerts R, Haustermans K, Topal B, Van SW, Verslype C. Systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16:265–74
20.
go back to reference Smeenk HG, Tran TC, Erdmann J, van Eijck CH, Jeekel J. Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390:94–103PubMedCrossRef Smeenk HG, Tran TC, Erdmann J, van Eijck CH, Jeekel J. Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390:94–103PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004; 91:586–94PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004; 91:586–94PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 221:721–31PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 221:721–31PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, et al. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2001; 234:758–68PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, et al. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2001; 234:758–68PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–10PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–10PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, Lorenz D, Post S, Trede M. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 2003; 27:324–9PubMedCrossRef Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, Lorenz D, Post S, Trede M. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 2003; 27:324–9PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bassi C, Stocken DD, Olah A, et al. Influence of surgical resection and post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-1 Randomized Controlled Trial. Dig Surg 2005; 22:353–63PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Stocken DD, Olah A, et al. Influence of surgical resection and post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-1 Randomized Controlled Trial. Dig Surg 2005; 22:353–63PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Goldstein D, Carroll S, Apte M, Keogh G. Modern management of pancreatic carcinoma. Intern Med J 2004; 34:475–81PubMedCrossRef Goldstein D, Carroll S, Apte M, Keogh G. Modern management of pancreatic carcinoma. Intern Med J 2004; 34:475–81PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Koeppler H, Duru M, Grundheber M, et al. Palliative treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma in community-based oncology group practices. J Support Oncol 2004; 2:159–63PubMed Koeppler H, Duru M, Grundheber M, et al. Palliative treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma in community-based oncology group practices. J Support Oncol 2004; 2:159–63PubMed
29.
go back to reference Prost P, Ychou M, Azria D. [Gemcitabine and pancreatic cancer]. Bull Cancer 2002; 89(Spec No):S91–5PubMed Prost P, Ychou M, Azria D. [Gemcitabine and pancreatic cancer]. Bull Cancer 2002; 89(Spec No):S91–5PubMed
30.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, et al. Phase III randomised comparison of gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 2005; 3:4 (abstract PS11) Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, et al. Phase III randomised comparison of gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 2005; 3:4 (abstract PS11)
31.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib improves survival when added to gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG). J Clin Oncol 2005;ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. (abstract 77). Vol 23, No.16S, Part I of II (June 1 Supplement), 2005:1 41st Annual Meeting American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) May 13–17, 2005 Orlando, Florida Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib improves survival when added to gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG). J Clin Oncol 2005;ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. (abstract 77). Vol 23, No.16S, Part I of II (June 1 Supplement), 2005:1 41st Annual Meeting American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) May 13–17, 2005 Orlando, Florida
32.
go back to reference Yamada H, Katoh H, Kondo S, Okushiba S, Morikawa T. Hepatectomy for metastases from non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine tumor. Anticancer Res 2001; 21:4159–62PubMed Yamada H, Katoh H, Kondo S, Okushiba S, Morikawa T. Hepatectomy for metastases from non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine tumor. Anticancer Res 2001; 21:4159–62PubMed
33.
go back to reference Christophe M, Le Treut YP, Pol B, Brandone JM, Capobianco C, Bricot R. [Cancer of the pancreas. A plea for resection. 162 operated patients]. Presse Med 1992; 21:741–4PubMed Christophe M, Le Treut YP, Pol B, Brandone JM, Capobianco C, Bricot R. [Cancer of the pancreas. A plea for resection. 162 operated patients]. Presse Med 1992; 21:741–4PubMed
34.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 1996; 223:718–25PubMedCrossRef Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 1996; 223:718–25PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Beger HG, Thorab FC, Liu Z, Harada N, Rau BM. Pathogenesis and treatment of neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater: Kausch-Whipple procedure with lymph node dissection in cancer of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004; 11:232–8PubMedCrossRef Beger HG, Thorab FC, Liu Z, Harada N, Rau BM. Pathogenesis and treatment of neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater: Kausch-Whipple procedure with lymph node dissection in cancer of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004; 11:232–8PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S, Pasquali C, Sperti C. General aspects of surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 1999; 16:265–75PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, Pasquali C, Sperti C. General aspects of surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 1999; 16:265–75PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Shimada K, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Sakamoto M. Successful outcome after resection of pancreatic cancer with a solitary hepatic metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:603–5PubMed Shimada K, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Yamasaki S, Sakamoto M. Successful outcome after resection of pancreatic cancer with a solitary hepatic metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:603–5PubMed
38.
go back to reference Sunada S, Miyata M, Tanaka Y, et al. Aggressive resection for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Today 1992; 22:74–7PubMedCrossRef Sunada S, Miyata M, Tanaka Y, et al. Aggressive resection for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Today 1992; 22:74–7PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2403–13PubMed Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2403–13PubMed
40.
go back to reference Conroy T, Paillot B, Francois E, et al. Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer—a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1228–36PubMedCrossRef Conroy T, Paillot B, Francois E, et al. Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer—a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1228–36PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, van de Velde H, Karasek P, et al. Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1430–8PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, van de Velde H, Karasek P, et al. Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1430–8PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cress RD, Yin D, Clarke L, Bold R, Holly EA. Survival among patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a population-based study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006; 17:403–9PubMedCrossRef Cress RD, Yin D, Clarke L, Bold R, Holly EA. Survival among patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a population-based study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006; 17:403–9PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, et al. Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut 2005; 54:385–7PubMedCrossRef Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, et al. Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut 2005; 54:385–7PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, et al. Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1592–9PubMedCrossRef Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, et al. Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1592–9PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2005; 138:618–28PubMedCrossRef Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2005; 138:618–28PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Luttges J, Kloppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45:855–66PubMed Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Luttges J, Kloppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45:855–66PubMed
47.
go back to reference Nimura Y, Nagino M, Kato H, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology 2004; 4:274 Nimura Y, Nagino M, Kato H, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology 2004; 4:274
48.
go back to reference Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Piso P, Pichlmayr R. [Is liver resection in metastases of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma justified?]. Chirurg 1996; 67:366–70PubMed Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Piso P, Pichlmayr R. [Is liver resection in metastases of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma justified?]. Chirurg 1996; 67:366–70PubMed
49.
go back to reference Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3509–16PubMedCrossRef Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3509–16PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Takezako Y, Morizane C. An early phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncology 2005; 68:171–8PubMedCrossRef Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Takezako Y, Morizane C. An early phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncology 2005; 68:171–8PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic Resection for M1 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Shailesh V. Shrikhande, MD
Jörg Kleeff, MD
Carolin Reiser, MD
Jürgen Weitz, MD
Ulf Hinz, MSc
Irene Esposito, MD
Jan Schmidt, MD
Helmut Friess, MD
Markus W. Büchler, MD
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9131-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2007 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Poor Prognosis for Biomarkers