Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Tooth Extraction | Research

Classification of postoperative edema based on the anatomic division with mandibular third molar extraction

Authors: Yeong Kon Jeong, Jeong-Kui Ku, Sung Hyun Baik, Jae-Seek You, Dae Ho Leem, Sun-Kyu Choi

Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Several investigations have been performed for a postoperative edema after extraction, but the results have been controversial due to low objectivity or poorly reproducible assessments of the edema. The aim of this study was to suggest a classification and patterns of postoperative edema according to the anatomical division associated with extraction of mandibular third molar as a qualitative evaluation method.

Methods

This study was conducted forty-four mandibular third molars extracted and MRI was taken within 48 h after extraction. The postoperative edema space was classified by MRI (one anatomic component—buccinator muscle—and four fascial spaces—supra-periosteum space, buccal space, parapharyngeal space, and lingual space), and evaluated independently by two examiners. The inter-examiner reliability was calculated using Kappa statistics.

Results

The evaluation of buccinator muscle edema showed good agreement and the fascial spaces showed constant high agreement. The incidence of postoperative edema was high in the following order: supra-periosteum space (75.00%), buccinator muscle (68.18%), parapharyngeal space (54.55%), buccal space (40.91%), and lingual space (25.00%).

Conclusion

Postoperative edema could be assessed clearly by each space, which showed a different tendency between the anatomic and fascial spaces.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC, Luo Y (2003) Changes in life quality following third molar surgery--the immediate postoperative period. Br Dent J 194(5):265–268 discussion 61CrossRef McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC, Luo Y (2003) Changes in life quality following third molar surgery--the immediate postoperative period. Br Dent J 194(5):265–268 discussion 61CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sortino F, Cicciù M (2011) Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar. Dent Res J 8(4):162–171CrossRef Sortino F, Cicciù M (2011) Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar. Dent Res J 8(4):162–171CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Darawade DA, Kumar S, Mehta R, Sharma AR, Reddy GS (2014) In search of a better option: dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone in third molar impaction surgery. J Int Oral Health 6(6):14–17PubMedPubMedCentral Darawade DA, Kumar S, Mehta R, Sharma AR, Reddy GS (2014) In search of a better option: dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone in third molar impaction surgery. J Int Oral Health 6(6):14–17PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Susarla SM, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D (2003) Third molar surgery and associated complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 15(2):177–186CrossRef Susarla SM, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D (2003) Third molar surgery and associated complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 15(2):177–186CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Samman AA, Othman HA (2017) Facial expression drawings and the full cup test: valid tools for the measurement of swelling after dental surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(1):22–25CrossRef Al-Samman AA, Othman HA (2017) Facial expression drawings and the full cup test: valid tools for the measurement of swelling after dental surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(1):22–25CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Üstün Y, Erdoǧan Ö, Esen E, Karsli ED (2003) Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(5):535–539CrossRef Üstün Y, Erdoǧan Ö, Esen E, Karsli ED (2003) Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(5):535–539CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van der Meer WJ, Dijkstra PU, Visser A, Vissink A, Ren Y (2014) Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(10):922–927CrossRef van der Meer WJ, Dijkstra PU, Visser A, Vissink A, Ren Y (2014) Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(10):922–927CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ku JK, Chang NH, Jeong YK, Baik SH, Choi SK (2020) Development and validation of a difficulty index for mandibular third molars with extraction time. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(5):328–334CrossRef Ku JK, Chang NH, Jeong YK, Baik SH, Choi SK (2020) Development and validation of a difficulty index for mandibular third molars with extraction time. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(5):328–334CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim J-Y, Yong H-S, Park K-H, Huh J-K (2019) Modified difficult index adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(6):309–315CrossRef Kim J-Y, Yong H-S, Park K-H, Huh J-K (2019) Modified difficult index adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(6):309–315CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kitamura S (2018) Anatomy of the fasciae and fascial spaces of the maxillofacial and the anterior neck regions. Anat Sci Int 93(1):1–13CrossRef Kitamura S (2018) Anatomy of the fasciae and fascial spaces of the maxillofacial and the anterior neck regions. Anat Sci Int 93(1):1–13CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim HC, Han MH, Moon MH, Kim JH, Kim IO, Chang KH (2005) CT and MR imaging of the buccal space: normal anatomy and abnormalities. Korean J Radiol 6(1):22–30CrossRef Kim HC, Han MH, Moon MH, Kim JH, Kim IO, Chang KH (2005) CT and MR imaging of the buccal space: normal anatomy and abnormalities. Korean J Radiol 6(1):22–30CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Altman DG (2003) MD, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ statistics with confidence, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, London Altman DG (2003) MD, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ statistics with confidence, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, London
13.
go back to reference Li N, Song J, Zhu G, Li X, Liu L, Shi X, Wang Y (2016) Periosteum tissue engineering—a review. Biomater Sci 4(11):1554–1561CrossRef Li N, Song J, Zhu G, Li X, Liu L, Shi X, Wang Y (2016) Periosteum tissue engineering—a review. Biomater Sci 4(11):1554–1561CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hupp JREE, Tucker MR (2008) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5th edn. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 317–333 Hupp JREE, Tucker MR (2008) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5th edn. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 317–333
15.
go back to reference Mobilio N, Vecchiatini R, Vasquez M, Calura G, Catapano S (2017) Effect of flap design and duration of surgery on acute postoperative symptoms and signs after extraction of lower third molars: a randomized prospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clinics Dent Prospects 11(3):156–160CrossRef Mobilio N, Vecchiatini R, Vasquez M, Calura G, Catapano S (2017) Effect of flap design and duration of surgery on acute postoperative symptoms and signs after extraction of lower third molars: a randomized prospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clinics Dent Prospects 11(3):156–160CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, Love RM (2007) Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(1):e1–e6CrossRef Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, Love RM (2007) Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(1):e1–e6CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alqahtani N, Khaleelahmed S, Desai F (2017) Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofacial Pathol 21(2):317–318 Alqahtani N, Khaleelahmed S, Desai F (2017) Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofacial Pathol 21(2):317–318
18.
go back to reference Kim Y, Kim TK, Leem DH (2015) Clinical study of a flap advancement technique without vertical incision for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(5):1113–1118CrossRef Kim Y, Kim TK, Leem DH (2015) Clinical study of a flap advancement technique without vertical incision for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(5):1113–1118CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Classification of postoperative edema based on the anatomic division with mandibular third molar extraction
Authors
Yeong Kon Jeong
Jeong-Kui Ku
Sung Hyun Baik
Jae-Seek You
Dae Ho Leem
Sun-Kyu Choi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2288-8586
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00291-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue