Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Computed Tomography | Research

Retrospective study about the postoperative stability of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture

Authors: Seoghwan Yang, Jin-yong Cho, Woo-chul Shim, Sungbeom Kim

Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative stability of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures according to the number of fixation sites and to investigate the direction of postoperative displacement of the unfixed part of the fractured segment.

Methods

This study was retrospectively performed on 38 patients who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation of ZMC fractures and were taken postoperative computed tomography (CT) between February 2012 and July 2019. The patients were classified into 3 groups: 1-point fixation, 2-point fixation, 3-point fixation according to the number of fixations. The postoperative displacement of the fractured segment was evaluated by the superimposition between postoperative CT and follow-up CT, and the postoperative stability according to the fixation sites was investigated through the amount of postoperative displacement. In addition, it was investigated in which direction the location of the fractured segment was changed in the unfixed fractured segment according to the fixation sites.

Results

The amount of postoperative displacement of the fractured segment was 0.75 ± 1.18 mm on average.
In the postoperative displacement of the distal area according to the number of fixation of the fracture, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of displacement of the fracture (p = 0.574).
As for the direction of the change in the location of the fractured segment, 12 patients among 38 patients with the change in the location of the fractured segment were investigated, and the displacement in the medial direction (n = 11, 91.67%) was the most common in all three fixation methods.

Conclusion

In patients with a ZMC fracture who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation, the number of fixations did not make the difference in the postoperative displacement of the fracture. In addition, the fractured segment mainly changes in the medial direction after surgery, and this fact can be used as a reference for the reduction direction during surgery for the stable prognosis.
Literature
4.
go back to reference O'Hara DE, DelVecchio DA, Bartlett SP, Whitaker LA (1996) The Role of Microfixation in Malar Fractures: A Quantitative Biophysical Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:345–350CrossRef O'Hara DE, DelVecchio DA, Bartlett SP, Whitaker LA (1996) The Role of Microfixation in Malar Fractures: A Quantitative Biophysical Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:345–350CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retrospective study about the postoperative stability of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture
Authors
Seoghwan Yang
Jin-yong Cho
Woo-chul Shim
Sungbeom Kim
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2288-8586
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00311-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue