Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Computed Tomography | Research

Evaluation of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with the crestal approach and beta-tricalcium phosphate: a cone-beam computed tomography 3- to 9-year follow-up

Authors: Yoko Oba, Noriko Tachikawa, Motohiro Munakata, Tsuneji Okada, Shohei Kasugai

Published in: International Journal of Implant Dentistry | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We performed maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the crestal approach and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and a long-term evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

Twenty-three patients (30 implants) underwent sinus floor augmentation using the osteotome technique. Subjects underwent CBCT imaging before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at follow-up (≥ 3 years after surgery). We measured the changes in height of the augmented sinus floor (SL), the augmented bone above apex of the implant (BH), and the implant length that projected into the sinus (IL).

Results

The mean SL decreased from 6.54 ± 1.51 (immediately after surgery) to 3.11 ± 1.35 mm (follow-up). The mean BH decreased from 3.17 ± 0.97 to − 0.25 ± 1.19 mm; the maxillary sinus floor in many implants was near the apex at follow-up. The SL at follow-up showed a strong correlation with the IL (p = 0.0057).

Conclusions

Osteotome sinus floor elevation with beta-tricalcium phosphate was clinically effective. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis revealed that ≥ 3 years after surgery, the maxillary sinus floor was near the apex of the implant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:313–23.PubMed Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:313–23.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:48–56.PubMed Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:48–56.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613–6.PubMed Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:152,154–6. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:152,154–6.
5.
go back to reference Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3--less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15:698 700, 702–704.PubMed Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3--less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15:698 700, 702–704.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A. Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:881–92.CrossRef Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A. Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:881–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, et al. Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2:8.CrossRef Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, et al. Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2:8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:410–6.CrossRef Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:410–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, et al. Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus augmentation: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:e159–68.CrossRef Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, et al. Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus augmentation: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:e159–68.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Monje A, Diaz KT, Aranda L, et al. Schneiderian membrane thickness and clinical implications for sinus augmentation: a systematic review and meta-regression analyses. J Periodont. 2016;87(8):888–99.CrossRef Monje A, Diaz KT, Aranda L, et al. Schneiderian membrane thickness and clinical implications for sinus augmentation: a systematic review and meta-regression analyses. J Periodont. 2016;87(8):888–99.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ata-Ali J, Diago-Vilalta JV, Melo M, et al. What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:e400–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Ata-Ali J, Diago-Vilalta JV, Melo M, et al. What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:e400–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness, ostium patency, and residual ridge heights in the posterior maxilla: implications for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(6):755–60.CrossRef Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness, ostium patency, and residual ridge heights in the posterior maxilla: implications for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(6):755–60.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Carmeli G, Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, et al. Antral computerized tomography pre-operative evaluation: relationship between mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:78–82.CrossRef Carmeli G, Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, et al. Antral computerized tomography pre-operative evaluation: relationship between mucosal thickening and maxillary sinus function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:78–82.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lee SA, Lee CT, Fu MM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1085–97.CrossRef Lee SA, Lee CT, Fu MM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1085–97.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:35–51.CrossRef Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:35–51.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Manzano G, Montero J, Martín-Vallejo J, et al. Risk factors in early implant failure: a meta-analysis. Implant Dent. 2016;25:272–80.CrossRef Manzano G, Montero J, Martín-Vallejo J, et al. Risk factors in early implant failure: a meta-analysis. Implant Dent. 2016;25:272–80.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:8–17.CrossRef Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:8–17.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pjetursson BE, Ignjatovic D, Matuliene G, et al. Transalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: radiographic tissue remodeling. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:677–83.CrossRef Pjetursson BE, Ignjatovic D, Matuliene G, et al. Transalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: radiographic tissue remodeling. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:677–83.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Călin C, Petre A, Drafta S. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:558–76.CrossRef Călin C, Petre A, Drafta S. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:558–76.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, et al. Histological and histomorphometrical determination of the biogradation of β-tricalcium phosphate granules in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a prospective observational study. Implant Dent. 2017;26:275–83.CrossRef Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, et al. Histological and histomorphometrical determination of the biogradation of β-tricalcium phosphate granules in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a prospective observational study. Implant Dent. 2017;26:275–83.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, et al. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:691–700.CrossRef Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, et al. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:691–700.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nedir R, Nurdin N, Vazquez L, et al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting: a 10-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:609–17.CrossRef Nedir R, Nurdin N, Vazquez L, et al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting: a 10-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:609–17.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pjetursson BE, Rast C, Brägger U, et al. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients’ perception. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:667–76.CrossRef Pjetursson BE, Rast C, Brägger U, et al. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients’ perception. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:667–76.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Si MS, Shou YW, Shi YT, et al. Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4-9 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:1392–400.CrossRef Si MS, Shou YW, Shi YT, et al. Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4-9 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:1392–400.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Si MS, Zhuang LF, Gu YX, et al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:396–403.CrossRef Si MS, Zhuang LF, Gu YX, et al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:396–403.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sonoda T, Harada T, Yamamichi N, et al. Association between bone graft volume and maxillary sinus membrane elevation height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:735–40.CrossRef Sonoda T, Harada T, Yamamichi N, et al. Association between bone graft volume and maxillary sinus membrane elevation height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:735–40.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with the crestal approach and beta-tricalcium phosphate: a cone-beam computed tomography 3- to 9-year follow-up
Authors
Yoko Oba
Noriko Tachikawa
Motohiro Munakata
Tsuneji Okada
Shohei Kasugai
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Implant Dentistry / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2198-4034
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00225-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal of Implant Dentistry 1/2020 Go to the issue