Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | State of the Art

Novel aspects in diagnostic approach to respiratory patients: is it the time for a new semiotics?

Authors: Gino Soldati, Andrea Smargiassi, Alberto A. Mariani, Riccardo Inchingolo

Published in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Medical approach to patients is a fundamental step to get the correct diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to analyze some aspects of the reasoning process inherent in medical diagnosis in our era. Pathologic signs (anamnestic data, symptoms, semiotics, laboratory and strumental findings) represent informative phenomena to be integrated for inferring a diagnosis. Thus, diagnosis begins with “signs” and finishes in a probability of disease. The abductive reasoning process is the generation of a hypothesis to explain one or more observations (signs) in order to decide between alternative explanations searching the best one. This process is iterative during the diagnostic activity while collecting further observations and it could be creative generating new knowledge about what has not been experienced before. In the clinical setting the abductive process is not only theoretical, conversely the physical exploitation of the patient (palpation, percussion, auscultation) is always crucial. Through this manipulative abduction, new and still unexpressed information is discovered and evaluated and physicians are able “to think through doing” to get the correct diagnosis. Abductive inferential path originates with an emotional reaction (discovery of the signs), step by step explanations are formed and it ends with another emotional reaction (diagnosis). Few bedside instruments are allowed to physicians to amplify their ability to search for signs. Stethoscope is an example. Similarities between ultrasound exploration and percussion can be found. Bedside ultrasonography can be considered an external amplifier of signs, a particular kind of percussion and represents a valid example of abductive manipulation. In this searching for signs doctors act like detectives and sometimes the discovering of a strategic, unsuspected sign during abductive manipulation could represent the key point for the correct diagnosis. This condition is called serendipity. Ultrasound is a powerful tool for detecting soft, hidden, unexpected and strategic signs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2217–25.CrossRefPubMed Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2217–25.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–35.CrossRef Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–35.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.CrossRefPubMed Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Sebeok TA. Simptom sign, in: Sebeok TA. Signs: An introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2001. p. 65–76. Sebeok TA. Simptom sign, in: Sebeok TA. Signs: An introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2001. p. 65–76.
6.
go back to reference Santus P, Picciolo S, Proietto A, Falcone F, Mangiacavallo A, Pellegrino G, et al. Doctor-patient relationship: A resource to improve respiratory diseases management. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23:442–6.CrossRefPubMed Santus P, Picciolo S, Proietto A, Falcone F, Mangiacavallo A, Pellegrino G, et al. Doctor-patient relationship: A resource to improve respiratory diseases management. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23:442–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. I. Introduction, principles and concepts. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:564–79.CrossRefPubMed Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. I. Introduction, principles and concepts. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:564–79.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. II. Classification of human disease by clinical behaviour. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:757–81.CrossRefPubMed Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. II. Classification of human disease by clinical behaviour. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:757–81.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. IV. Acquisition of clinical data. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:1162–93.CrossRefPubMed Feinstein AS. Scientific methodology in clinical medicine. IV. Acquisition of clinical data. Ann Intern Med. 1964;61:1162–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rivadulla A. Abduction and beyond. Methodological and computational aspect of creativity in natural sciences. J Log and its applications. 2016;3:105–21. Rivadulla A. Abduction and beyond. Methodological and computational aspect of creativity in natural sciences. J Log and its applications. 2016;3:105–21.
11.
go back to reference Schleifer R, Vannatta J. The logic of diagnosis: Peirce, Literary narrative, and the history of present illness. J Med Philos. 2006;31:363–84.CrossRefPubMed Schleifer R, Vannatta J. The logic of diagnosis: Peirce, Literary narrative, and the history of present illness. J Med Philos. 2006;31:363–84.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thagard PR. The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. J Philos. 1978;75:76–92.CrossRef Thagard PR. The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. J Philos. 1978;75:76–92.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Magnani L. Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine. In: Evans DA, Patel VL, editors. Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice. Berlin: Springer; 1992. Magnani L. Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine. In: Evans DA, Patel VL, editors. Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice. Berlin: Springer; 1992.
14.
go back to reference Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, New York: Hutchinson; 1959. Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, New York: Hutchinson; 1959.
15.
go back to reference Lakatos I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1970. p. 365–95.CrossRef Lakatos I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1970. p. 365–95.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Magnani L. Abduction, Reason, and Science. New York: Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001.CrossRef Magnani L. Abduction, Reason, and Science. New York: Processes of Discovery and Explanation, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eco U. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana Unversity Press; 1991. Eco U. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana Unversity Press; 1991.
18.
go back to reference Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Magnani L. Inconsistencies and creative abduction in science. In: AI and Scientific Creativity, editor. Proceedings of the AISB99 Symposium on Scientific Creativity. Edinburgh: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, University of Edinburgh; 1999. p. 1.8. Magnani L. Inconsistencies and creative abduction in science. In: AI and Scientific Creativity, editor. Proceedings of the AISB99 Symposium on Scientific Creativity. Edinburgh: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, University of Edinburgh; 1999. p. 1.8.
20.
go back to reference Altable CR. Logic structure of clinical judgment and its relation to medical and psychiatric semiology. Psichopatology. 2012;45:344–51.CrossRef Altable CR. Logic structure of clinical judgment and its relation to medical and psychiatric semiology. Psichopatology. 2012;45:344–51.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Magnani L. Thinking through doing, external representations in abductive reasoning, AISB 2002 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science. London: Imperial College; 2002. Magnani L. Thinking through doing, external representations in abductive reasoning, AISB 2002 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science. London: Imperial College; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Nersessian N. Model based reasoning in conceptual change. In: Magnani L, Nersessian NJ, Thagard P, editors. Model based reasoning in scientific discovery. New York: Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. Nersessian N. Model based reasoning in conceptual change. In: Magnani L, Nersessian NJ, Thagard P, editors. Model based reasoning in scientific discovery. New York: Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999.
23.
go back to reference Koenig SJ, Narasimhan M, Mayo PH. Thoracic ultrasonography for the pulmonary specialist. Chest. 2011;40:1332–41.CrossRef Koenig SJ, Narasimhan M, Mayo PH. Thoracic ultrasonography for the pulmonary specialist. Chest. 2011;40:1332–41.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lobo V, Weingrow D, Perera P, Williams SR, Gharahbaghian L. Thoracic ultrasonography. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30:93–117.CrossRefPubMed Lobo V, Weingrow D, Perera P, Williams SR, Gharahbaghian L. Thoracic ultrasonography. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30:93–117.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Szabo TL. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. Szabo TL. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
26.
go back to reference Ward T, Vertue FM, Haig BD. Abductive method and clinical assessment in practice. Behav Chang. 1999;16:49–63.CrossRef Ward T, Vertue FM, Haig BD. Abductive method and clinical assessment in practice. Behav Chang. 1999;16:49–63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thagard P. Abductive inference: from philosophical analysis to neural mechanisms. In: Heit E, editor. Inductive reasoning: cognitive, mathematical and neuroscientific approaches (Feeney A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Thagard P. Abductive inference: from philosophical analysis to neural mechanisms. In: Heit E, editor. Inductive reasoning: cognitive, mathematical and neuroscientific approaches (Feeney A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
28.
go back to reference Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for the International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:577–91.CrossRefPubMed Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for the International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:577–91.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Sher S, Nenna R, Valente S, et al. Lung ultrasonography may provide an indirect estimation of lung porosity and airspace geometry. Respiration. 2014;88:458–68.CrossRefPubMed Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Sher S, Nenna R, Valente S, et al. Lung ultrasonography may provide an indirect estimation of lung porosity and airspace geometry. Respiration. 2014;88:458–68.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Soldati G, Demi M, Inchingolo R, Smargiassi A, Demi L. On the physical basis of the pulmonary sonographic interstitial syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(10):2075–86.CrossRefPubMed Soldati G, Demi M, Inchingolo R, Smargiassi A, Demi L. On the physical basis of the pulmonary sonographic interstitial syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(10):2075–86.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby JJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:9–15.CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby JJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:9–15.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Bourcier JE, Paquet J, Seinger M, Gallard A, Redonnet JP, Cheddadi F, et al. Performance comparison of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:115–8.CrossRefPubMed Bourcier JE, Paquet J, Seinger M, Gallard A, Redonnet JP, Cheddadi F, et al. Performance comparison of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:115–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Wilkerson RG, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:11.CrossRefPubMed Wilkerson RG, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:11.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Remer TG. Serendipity and the Three Princes, from the Peregrinaggio of 1557. 1st edition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1964. Remer TG. Serendipity and the Three Princes, from the Peregrinaggio of 1557. 1st edition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1964.
35.
go back to reference Roberts RM. Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1989. Roberts RM. Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1989.
36.
go back to reference Ginzburg C, Davin A. Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and scientific method. Hist Work. 1980;9:5–36.CrossRef Ginzburg C, Davin A. Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and scientific method. Hist Work. 1980;9:5–36.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Nordby JJ. Dead Rekoning: The art of forensic detection. Boca Raton: CRC Press, FL; 2000. Nordby JJ. Dead Rekoning: The art of forensic detection. Boca Raton: CRC Press, FL; 2000.
38.
go back to reference Innes M. Investigating murder: Detective work and the police response to criminal homicide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef Innes M. Investigating murder: Detective work and the police response to criminal homicide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Carson D. The abduction of Sherlock Holmes. Int J Police Sci Manag. 2009;11:193–202.CrossRef Carson D. The abduction of Sherlock Holmes. Int J Police Sci Manag. 2009;11:193–202.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Novel aspects in diagnostic approach to respiratory patients: is it the time for a new semiotics?
Authors
Gino Soldati
Andrea Smargiassi
Alberto A. Mariani
Riccardo Inchingolo
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2049-6958
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-017-0098-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue