Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Commentary

View point: gaps in the current guidelines for the prevention of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections

Authors: Kevin T. Kavanagh, Said Abusalem, Lindsay E. Calderon

Published in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The authors advocate the addition of two preventative strategies to the current United State’s guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections. It is known that Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carriers are at a higher risk for the development of infections and they can easily transmit the organism. The carriage rate of Staph. aureus in the general population approximates 33%. The CDC estimates the carriage rate of MRSA in the United States is approximately 2%. The first strategy is preoperative screening of surgical patients for Staph. aureus, including MRSA. This recommendation is based upon the growing literature which shows a benefit in both prevention of infections and guidance in preoperative antibiotic selection. The second is performing MRSA active surveillance screening on healthcare workers. The carriage rate of MRSA in healthcare workers approximates 5% and there are concerns of transmission of this pathogen to patients. MRSA decolonization of healthcare workers has been reported to approach a success rate of 90%. Healthcare workers colonized with dangerous pathogens, including MRSA, should be assigned to non-patient contact work areas. In addition, there needs to be implemented a safety net for both the worker’s economic security and healthcare. Finally, a reporting system for the healthcare worker acquisition and infections with dangerous pathogens needs to be implemented. These recommendations are needed because Staph. aureus including MRSA is endemic in the United States. Policies regarding endemic pathogens which are to be implemented only upon the occurrence of a facility defined “outbreak” have to be questioned, since absence of infections does not mean absence of transmission. Optimizing these policies will require further research but until then we should error on the side of patient safety.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017 May 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMed Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017 May 3. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2017.​0904. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blaser MJ. Missing microbes: how the overuse of antibiotics is fueling our modern plagues. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC; 2014. Blaser MJ. Missing microbes: how the overuse of antibiotics is fueling our modern plagues. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, Abbas M, Atema JJ, Gans S, van Rijen M, Boermeester MA, Egger M, Kluytmans J, Pittet D, Solomkin JS; WHO guidelines development group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16(12):e276-e287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PMID: 27816413.CrossRefPubMed Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, Abbas M, Atema JJ, Gans S, van Rijen M, Boermeester MA, Egger M, Kluytmans J, Pittet D, Solomkin JS; WHO guidelines development group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16(12):e276-e287. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PMID: 27816413.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Price JR, Cole K, Bexley A, Kostiou V, Eyre DW, Golubchik T, Wilson DJ, Crook DW, Walker AS, Peto TEA, Llewelyn MJ, Paul J. Modernising medical microbiology informatics group. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between health-care workers, the environment, and patients in an intensive care unit: a longitudinal cohort study based on whole-genome sequencing. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(2):207–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30413-3 Epub 2016 Nov 16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Price JR, Cole K, Bexley A, Kostiou V, Eyre DW, Golubchik T, Wilson DJ, Crook DW, Walker AS, Peto TEA, Llewelyn MJ, Paul J. Modernising medical microbiology informatics group. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between health-care workers, the environment, and patients in an intensive care unit: a longitudinal cohort study based on whole-genome sequencing. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(2):207–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1473-3099(16)30413-3 Epub 2016 Nov 16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Weinstein HJ. The relation between the nasal-staphylococcal-carrier state and the incidence of postoperative complications. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(26):1303–8.CrossRefPubMed Weinstein HJ. The relation between the nasal-staphylococcal-carrier state and the incidence of postoperative complications. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(26):1303–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gupta K, Strymish J, Abi-Haidar Y, Williams SA, Itani KM. Preoperative nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus status, surgical prophylaxis, and risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes in veterans. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:791–6.CrossRefPubMed Gupta K, Strymish J, Abi-Haidar Y, Williams SA, Itani KM. Preoperative nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus status, surgical prophylaxis, and risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes in veterans. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:791–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Branch-Elliman W, Ripollone JE, O'Brien WJ, Itani KMF, Schweizer ML, Perencevich E, Strymish J, Gupta K. Risk of surgical site infection, acute kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection following antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin plus a beta-lactam versus either drug alone: A national propensity-score-adjusted retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340 eCollection 2017 Jul.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Branch-Elliman W, Ripollone JE, O'Brien WJ, Itani KMF, Schweizer ML, Perencevich E, Strymish J, Gupta K. Risk of surgical site infection, acute kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection following antibiotic prophylaxis with vancomycin plus a beta-lactam versus either drug alone: A national propensity-score-adjusted retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1002340 eCollection 2017 Jul.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Knelson LP, Williams DA, Gergen MF, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sexton DJ, Anderson DJ. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention epicenters program. A comparison of environmental contamination by patients infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a multicenter study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(7):872–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/676861 Epub 2014 May 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Knelson LP, Williams DA, Gergen MF, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sexton DJ, Anderson DJ. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention epicenters program. A comparison of environmental contamination by patients infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a multicenter study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(7):872–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1086/​676861 Epub 2014 May 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Chang S, Sethi AK, Stiefel U, et al. Occurrence of skin and environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus before results of polymerase chain reaction at hospital admission become available. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:607Y612.CrossRef Chang S, Sethi AK, Stiefel U, et al. Occurrence of skin and environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus before results of polymerase chain reaction at hospital admission become available. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:607Y612.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Albrich WC, Harbarth S. Health-careworkers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA. Lancet infect. Dis. 2008;8:289–301.CrossRefPubMed Albrich WC, Harbarth S. Health-careworkers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA. Lancet infect. Dis. 2008;8:289–301.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Statement of Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Huma rights, and international organizations combating the Ebola threat. August 7, 2014. Statement of Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Huma rights, and international organizations combating the Ebola threat. August 7, 2014.
Metadata
Title
View point: gaps in the current guidelines for the prevention of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections
Authors
Kevin T. Kavanagh
Said Abusalem
Lindsay E. Calderon
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2047-2994
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0407-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2018 Go to the issue