Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perioperative Medicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Surgeons’ views on preoperative medical evaluation: a qualitative study

Authors: Kevin R. Riggs, Zackary D. Berger, Martin A. Makary, Eric B. Bass, Geetanjali Chander

Published in: Perioperative Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is substantial variation in the practice of preoperative medical evaluation (PME) and limited evidence for its benefit, which raises concerns about overuse. Surgeons have a unique role in this multidisciplinary practice. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore surgeons’ practices and their beliefs about PME.

Methods

We conducted of semi-structured interviews with 18 surgeons in Baltimore, Maryland. Surgeons were purposively sampled to maximize diversity in terms of practice type (academic vs. private practice), surgical specialty, gender, and experience level. General topics included surgeons’ current PME practices, perceived benefits and harms of PME, the surgical risk assessment, and potential improvements and barriers to change. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis to identify themes, which are presented as assertions. Transcripts were re-analyzed to identify supporting and opposing instances of each assertion.

Results

A total of 15 themes emerged. There was wide variation in surgeons’ described PME practices. Surgeons believed that PME improves surgical outcomes, but not all patients benefit. Surgeons were cognizant of the financial cost of the current system and the potential inconvenience that additional tests and office visits pose to patients. Surgeons believed that PME has minimal to no risk and that a normal PME is reassuring to them and patients. Surgeons were confident in their ability to assess surgical risk, and risk assessment by non-surgeons rarely affected their surgical decision-making. Hospital and anesthesiology requirements were a major driver of surgeons’ PME practices. Surgeons did not receive much training on PME but perceived their practices to be similar to their colleagues. Surgeons believed that PME provides malpractice protection, welcomed standardization, and perceived there to be inadequate evidence to significantly change their current practice.

Conclusions

Views of surgeons should be considered in future research on and reforms to the PME process.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Balk EM, Earley A, Hadar N, Shah N, Trikalinos TA. Benefits and Harms of Routine Preoperative Testing: Comparative Effectiveness. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Balk EM, Earley A, Hadar N, Shah N, Trikalinos TA. Benefits and Harms of Routine Preoperative Testing: Comparative Effectiveness. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
go back to reference Brateanu A, Rothberg MB. Why do clinicians continue to order ‘routine preoperative tests’ despite the evidence? Cleve Clin J Med. 2015;82(10):667–70.CrossRefPubMed Brateanu A, Rothberg MB. Why do clinicians continue to order ‘routine preoperative tests’ despite the evidence? Cleve Clin J Med. 2015;82(10):667–70.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brown SR, Brown J. Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study. Fam Med. 2011;43(5):338–43.PubMed Brown SR, Brown J. Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study. Fam Med. 2011;43(5):338–43.PubMed
go back to reference Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan; 1986. p. 119–61. Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan; 1986. p. 119–61.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Katz RI, Barnhart JM, Ho G, Hersch D, Dayan SS, Keehn L. A survey on the intended purposes and perceived utility of preoperative cardiology consultations. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(4):830–6.PubMed Katz RI, Barnhart JM, Ho G, Hersch D, Dayan SS, Keehn L. A survey on the intended purposes and perceived utility of preoperative cardiology consultations. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(4):830–6.PubMed
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DH, Burkman RT. Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability? Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1022–6.CrossRefPubMed Kirkpatrick DH, Burkman RT. Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability? Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1022–6.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Patey AM, Islam R, Francis JJ, Bryson GL, Grimshaw JM, Canada PPT. Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests. Implement Sci. 2012;7:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patey AM, Islam R, Francis JJ, Bryson GL, Grimshaw JM, Canada PPT. Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests. Implement Sci. 2012;7:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Riggs KR, Segal JB. What is the rationale for preoperative medical evaluations? A closer look at surgical risk and common terminology. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(6):681–4.CrossRefPubMed Riggs KR, Segal JB. What is the rationale for preoperative medical evaluations? A closer look at surgical risk and common terminology. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(6):681–4.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.
go back to reference Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of medical testing for cataract surgery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):168–75.CrossRefPubMed Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of medical testing for cataract surgery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):168–75.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smetana GW. The conundrum of unnecessary preoperative testing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1359–61.CrossRefPubMed Smetana GW. The conundrum of unnecessary preoperative testing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1359–61.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Thilen SR, Bryson CL, Reid RJ, Wijeysundera DN, Weaver EM, Treggiari MM. Patterns of preoperative consultation and surgical specialty in an integrated healthcare system. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(5):1028–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thilen SR, Bryson CL, Reid RJ, Wijeysundera DN, Weaver EM, Treggiari MM. Patterns of preoperative consultation and surgical specialty in an integrated healthcare system. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(5):1028–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference van Gelder FE, de Graaff JC, van Wolfswinkel L, van Klei WA. Preoperative testing in noncardiac surgery patients: a survey amongst European anaesthesiologists. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29(10):465–70.CrossRefPubMed van Gelder FE, de Graaff JC, van Wolfswinkel L, van Klei WA. Preoperative testing in noncardiac surgery patients: a survey amongst European anaesthesiologists. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29(10):465–70.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wijeysundera DN, Austin PC, Beattie W, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Outcomes and processes of care related to preoperative medical consultation. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1365–74.CrossRefPubMed Wijeysundera DN, Austin PC, Beattie W, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Outcomes and processes of care related to preoperative medical consultation. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1365–74.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wijeysundera DN, Austin PC, Beattie WS, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Variation in the practice of preoperative medical consultation for major elective noncardiac surgery: a population-based study. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed Wijeysundera DN, Austin PC, Beattie WS, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Variation in the practice of preoperative medical consultation for major elective noncardiac surgery: a population-based study. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgeons’ views on preoperative medical evaluation: a qualitative study
Authors
Kevin R. Riggs
Zackary D. Berger
Martin A. Makary
Eric B. Bass
Geetanjali Chander
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Perioperative Medicine / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2047-0525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0072-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Perioperative Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue