Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Care | Protocol

Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric palliative care—a protocol for a scoping review

Authors: Heidi Holmen, Anette Winger, Simen A. Steindal, Charlotte Castor, Lisbeth Gravdal Kvarme, Kirsti Riiser, Kari L. Mariussen, Anja Lee

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In pediatric palliative care (PPC), there is a need to involve the child’s voice in situations regarding their symptoms and care needs. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be tools to systematically gather data reported from the child or a proxy if the child is not capable to self-report in order to provide the services they need. There has been a rapid development in PROM research the last decade, and there is a need for an overview of current knowledge and experiences in the field. Thus, we aim to explore and summarize what is known from the published research about PROMs in PPC.

Methods

We propose a scoping review following the framework by Arksey and O’Malley and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search will be performed in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), American Psychological Association (APA) PsycInfo, Health and Psychosocial Instruments (HaPI), and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED). The search will be followed by snowballing to identify key papers and significant researchers for additional citations. Covidence will facilitate the independent review of eligible citations, and data will be extracted and presented descriptively, and thematically analyzed using NVivo.

Discussion

The scoping review suggested in this protocol will identify PROMs which have been proposed in PPC and clarify the experiences with their use. The findings of this review will be relevant for researchers and healthcare personnel caring for children and adolescents in PPC. In addition, by highlighting knowledge gaps about the use of PROMs in PPC, this review will point out future needs within this field of research, which is crucial for improving quality of care in PPC.

Systematic review registration

Literature
2.
go back to reference Radbruch LP, S. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe : part 1. Eur J Palliat Care. 2009;16(6):278–89. Radbruch LP, S. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe : part 1. Eur J Palliat Care. 2009;16(6):278–89.
3.
go back to reference WHO. Definition of palliative care. Geneva: Worlds Health Organization; 1998. WHO. Definition of palliative care. Geneva: Worlds Health Organization; 1998.
6.
go back to reference Knaul F, Radbruch L, Connor S, de Lima L, Arreola-Ornelas H, Mendez Carniado O, et al. How many adults and children are in need of palliative care worldwide? In: Global Atlas of Palliative Care 2nd edition [Internet]. London: Worldwide Hospice and Palliative Care Alliance (WHPCA) and the World Health Organization (WHO); 2020. Knaul F, Radbruch L, Connor S, de Lima L, Arreola-Ornelas H, Mendez Carniado O, et al. How many adults and children are in need of palliative care worldwide? In: Global Atlas of Palliative Care 2nd edition [Internet]. London: Worldwide Hospice and Palliative Care Alliance (WHPCA) and the World Health Organization (WHO); 2020.
7.
go back to reference Fraser LK, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, Norman P, Parslow R. ‘Make Every Child Count’ estimating current and future prevalence of; 2020. Fraser LK, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, Norman P, Parslow R. ‘Make Every Child Count’ estimating current and future prevalence of; 2020.
12.
go back to reference Feudtner C, Rosenberg AR, Boss RD, Wiener L, Lyon ME, Hinds PS, et al. Challenges and priorities for pediatric palliative care research in the U.S. and similar practice settings: report from a pediatric palliative care research network workshop. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;58(5):909–17.e3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Feudtner C, Rosenberg AR, Boss RD, Wiener L, Lyon ME, Hinds PS, et al. Challenges and priorities for pediatric palliative care research in the U.S. and similar practice settings: report from a pediatric palliative care research network workshop. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;58(5):909–17.e3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Marcus KL, Santos G, Ciapponi A, Comandé D, Bilodeau M, Wolfe J, et al. Impact of specialized pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;59(2):339–64. e10.CrossRefPubMed Marcus KL, Santos G, Ciapponi A, Comandé D, Bilodeau M, Wolfe J, et al. Impact of specialized pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;59(2):339–64. e10.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Winger A, Kvarme LG, Løyland B, Kristiansen C, Helseth S, Ravn IH. Family experiences with palliative care for children at home: a systematic literature review. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):1–19.CrossRef Winger A, Kvarme LG, Løyland B, Kristiansen C, Helseth S, Ravn IH. Family experiences with palliative care for children at home: a systematic literature review. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):1–19.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Friedel M, Aujoulat I, Dubois A-C, et al. Instruments to measure outcomes in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20182379. Friedel M, Aujoulat I, Dubois A-C, et al. Instruments to measure outcomes in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20182379.
32.
go back to reference Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1–7.CrossRef Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1–7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual, JBI; 2020. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual, JBI; 2020.
39.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2012. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2012.
41.
go back to reference Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):1–10.CrossRef Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):1–10.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric palliative care—a protocol for a scoping review
Authors
Heidi Holmen
Anette Winger
Simen A. Steindal
Charlotte Castor
Lisbeth Gravdal Kvarme
Kirsti Riiser
Kari L. Mariussen
Anja Lee
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01791-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue