Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Heart Surgery | Protocol

Expanding enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery to include the patient voice: a scoping review protocol

Authors: Nebojša Oravec, Rakesh C. Arora, Brian Bjorklund, April Gregora, Caroline Monnin, Todd A. Duhamel, David E. Kent, Annette S. H. Schultz, Anna M. Chudyk

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cardiac surgery is becoming increasingly common in older, more vulnerable adults. A focus on timely and complete medical and functional recovery has led to the development of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) for a number of surgical procedures and subspecialties, including cardiac surgery (ERAS® Cardiac). An element that is often overlooked in the development and implementation of ERPs is the involvement of key stakeholder groups, including surgery patients and caregivers (e.g., family and/or friends). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a scoping review of cardiac patient and caregiver preferences and outcomes relevant to cardiac surgery ERPs.

Methods

Using Arksey and O’Malley’s et al six-stage framework for scoping review methodologies with adaptions from Levac et al. (Represent Interv: 1–18, 2012), a scoping review of existing literature describing patient- and caregiver-identified preferences and outcomes as they relate to care received in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery will be undertaken. The search for relevant articles will be conducted using electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase), as well as through a search of the grey literature (e.g., CPG Infobase, Heart and Stroke Foundation, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations, Google Advanced, and Prospero). Published and unpublished full-text articles written in English, published after the year 2000, and that relate to the research question will be included. Central to the design of this scoping review is our collaboration with two patient partners who possess lived experience as cardiac surgery patients.

Discussion

This review will identify strategies that can be integrated into ERPs for cardiac surgery which align with patient- and caregiver-defined values. Broadly, it is our goal to demonstrate the added value of patient engagement in research to aid in the success of system change processes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Carter A, Casey DC, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.CrossRef Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Carter A, Casey DC, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Favaloro RG, Effler DB, Groves LK, Fergusson DJ, Lozada JS. Double internal mammary artery-myocardial implantation. Clinical evaluation of results in 150 patients. Circulation. 1968;37(4):549–55.PubMedCrossRef Favaloro RG, Effler DB, Groves LK, Fergusson DJ, Lozada JS. Double internal mammary artery-myocardial implantation. Clinical evaluation of results in 150 patients. Circulation. 1968;37(4):549–55.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferguson TB, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL. A decade of change - risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(2):480–9.PubMedCrossRef Ferguson TB, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL. A decade of change - risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(2):480–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bababekov YJ, Pomposelli JJ, Yeh H, Rudd RE, Chang DC. Surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):e103–4.PubMedCrossRef Bababekov YJ, Pomposelli JJ, Yeh H, Rudd RE, Chang DC. Surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):e103–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Doering LV, McGuire AW, Rourke D. Recovering from cardiac surgery. Infect Control. 2005;24(May):466–72. Doering LV, McGuire AW, Rourke D. Recovering from cardiac surgery. Infect Control. 2005;24(May):466–72.
7.
go back to reference Silvestry FE. Postoperative complications among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In: Manaker S, King TE, editors. Up-To-Date [database on the Internet]. Waltham: UpToDate; 2020. Available from http://www.uptodate.com [cited 22 June 2020]. Silvestry FE. Postoperative complications among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In: Manaker S, King TE, editors. Up-To-Date [database on the Internet]. Waltham: UpToDate; 2020. Available from http://​www.​uptodate.​com [cited 22 June 2020].
8.
go back to reference Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(8):755–66.PubMedCrossRef Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(8):755–66.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2321–9.PubMedCrossRef Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2321–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lassen K. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):961.PubMedCrossRef Lassen K. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):961.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. p. 291. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. p. 291.
12.
13.
go back to reference Commonwealth Foundation. Capacity development framework; 2014. p. 1–8. Available from: http://library.cgiar.org/handle/10947/3414%5Cnhttp://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/10947/3414/1/CGIARCapacity Development Framework Working Draft.pdf. Commonwealth Foundation. Capacity development framework; 2014. p. 1–8. Available from: http://​library.​cgiar.​org/​handle/​10947/​3414%5Cnhttp://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/10947/3414/1/CGIARCapacity Development Framework Working Draft.pdf.
15.
go back to reference Singler L, Mcadams P, Uhlenbrauck G, Jernigan K, Schulman J. Models of engagement: patients as partners in clinical research; 2018. p. 28–32. Available from: http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/print/350588?page = full&pageID = 2. Singler L, Mcadams P, Uhlenbrauck G, Jernigan K, Schulman J. Models of engagement: patients as partners in clinical research; 2018. p. 28–32. Available from: http://​www.​appliedclinicalt​rialsonline.​com/​print/​350588?​page = full&pageID = 2.
16.
go back to reference DiCenso A, Martin-Misener R, Bryant-Lukosius D, Bourgeault I, Kilpatrick K, Donald F, et al. Advanced practice nursing in Canada: overview of a decision support synthesis. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2010;23 Spec No 2010:15–34. DiCenso A, Martin-Misener R, Bryant-Lukosius D, Bourgeault I, Kilpatrick K, Donald F, et al. Advanced practice nursing in Canada: overview of a decision support synthesis. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2010;23 Spec No 2010:15–34.
17.
go back to reference Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:1–12.CrossRef Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:1–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:1–7. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:1–7.
20.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Introduction: rationality. Represent Interv. 2012:1–18. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Introduction: rationality. Represent Interv. 2012:1–18.
23.
go back to reference LeCompte MD. Analyzing qualitative data. In: Theory into Practice, vol. 39; 2000. p. 146–54. LeCompte MD. Analyzing qualitative data. In: Theory into Practice, vol. 39; 2000. p. 146–54.
24.
go back to reference Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Heath Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.CrossRef Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Heath Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2(2):121–45 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8261254%5Cnhttp://smm.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/096228029300200202.PubMedCrossRef Fleiss JL. Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2(2):121–45 Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​8261254%5Cnhttp://smm.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/096228029300200202.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference CIHR. Patient engagement framework | NeHC | HIMSS, vol. 19; 2014. Available from: http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/genResourceDetailPDF.aspx?ItemNumber = 28305. CIHR. Patient engagement framework | NeHC | HIMSS, vol. 19; 2014. Available from: http://​www.​himss.​org/​ResourceLibrary/​genResourceDetai​lPDF.​aspx?​ItemNumber = 28305.
Metadata
Title
Expanding enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery to include the patient voice: a scoping review protocol
Authors
Nebojša Oravec
Rakesh C. Arora
Brian Bjorklund
April Gregora
Caroline Monnin
Todd A. Duhamel
David E. Kent
Annette S. H. Schultz
Anna M. Chudyk
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01564-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue