Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: a systematic review

Authors: Kate Sabot, Deepthi Wickremasinghe, Karl Blanchet, Bilal Avan, Joanna Schellenberg

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social network analysis quantifies and visualizes relationships between and among individuals or organizations. Applications in the health sector remain underutilized. This systematic review seeks to analyze what social network methods have been used to study professional communication and performance among healthcare providers.

Methods

Ten databases were searched from 1990 through April 2016, yielding 5970 articles screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers who extracted data and critically appraised each study. Inclusion criteria were study of health care worker professional communication, network methods used, and patient outcomes measured. The search identified 10 systematic reviews. The final set of articles had their citations prospectively and retrospectively screened. We used narrative synthesis to summarize the findings.

Results

The six articles meeting our inclusion criteria described unique health sectors: one at primary healthcare level and five at tertiary level; five conducted in the USA, one in Australia. Four studies looked at multidisciplinary healthcare workers, while two focused on nurses. Two studies used mixed methods, four quantitative methods only, and one involved an experimental design. Four administered network surveys, one coded observations, and one used an existing survey to extract network data. Density and centrality were the most common network metrics although one study did not calculate any network properties and only visualized the network. Four studies involved tests of significance, and two used modeling methods. Social network analysis software preferences were evenly split between ORA and UCINET. All articles meeting our criteria were published in the past 5 years, suggesting that this remains in clinical care a nascent but emergent research area. There was marked diversity across all six studies in terms of research questions, health sector area, patient outcomes, and network analysis methods.

Conclusion

Network methods are underutilized for the purposes of understanding professional communication and performance among healthcare providers. The paucity of articles meeting our search criteria, lack of studies in middle- and low-income contexts, limited number in non-tertiary settings, and few longitudinal, experimental designs, or network interventions present clear research gaps.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42015019328
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murray CJ. Shifting to sustainable development goals—implications for global health. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1390–3.CrossRefPubMed Murray CJ. Shifting to sustainable development goals—implications for global health. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1390–3.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications, vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.CrossRef Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications, vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Meltzer D, Chung J, Khalili P, Marlow E, Arora V, Schumock G, et al. Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1119–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meltzer D, Chung J, Khalili P, Marlow E, Arora V, Schumock G, et al. Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1119–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE; 2011. Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE; 2011.
7.
go back to reference Blanchet K, James P. How to do (or not to do)… a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:438–46.CrossRefPubMed Blanchet K, James P. How to do (or not to do)… a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:438–46.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Dearing JW. Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2008;14:99–108.CrossRefPubMed Dearing JW. Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2008;14:99–108.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Saint-Charles J, Mongeau P. Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations. Soc Networks. 2009;31:33–9.CrossRef Saint-Charles J, Mongeau P. Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations. Soc Networks. 2009;31:33–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. In: Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011. p. 340–69. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. In: Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011. p. 340–69.
13.
14.
go back to reference Huisman M, van Duijn MAJ. A reader’s guide for SNA software. In: Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The sage handbook of social network analysis. London: SAGE; 2011. p. 578–600. Huisman M, van Duijn MAJ. A reader’s guide for SNA software. In: Scott J, Carrington PJ, editors. The sage handbook of social network analysis. London: SAGE; 2011. p. 578–600.
15.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd and BMJ Books; 2005.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd and BMJ Books; 2005.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, et al. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement Sci. 2010;5:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, et al. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement Sci. 2010;5:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Scott SD, Albrecht L, O'Leary K, Ball GD, Hartling L, Hofmeyer A, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scott SD, Albrecht L, O'Leary K, Ball GD, Hartling L, Hofmeyer A, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:751.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:751.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Van Eerd D, Cole D, Keown K, Irvin E, Kramer D, Gibson J, et al. Report on knowledge transfer and exchange practices: a systematic review of the quality and types of instruments used to assess KTE implementation and impact. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2011. Van Eerd D, Cole D, Keown K, Irvin E, Kramer D, Gibson J, et al. Report on knowledge transfer and exchange practices: a systematic review of the quality and types of instruments used to assess KTE implementation and impact. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2011.
20.
go back to reference Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye PB. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85:729–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye PB. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85:729–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Shaxson L, Bielak A, Ahmed I, Brien D, Conant B, Fisher C, et al. Concept paper & case studies: expanding our understanding of K* (Kt, KE, Ktt, KMb, KB, KM, etc.) In: K* Conference. Hamilton: United Nations University. p. 2012. Shaxson L, Bielak A, Ahmed I, Brien D, Conant B, Fisher C, et al. Concept paper & case studies: expanding our understanding of K* (Kt, KE, Ktt, KMb, KB, KM, etc.) In: K* Conference. Hamilton: United Nations University. p. 2012.
22.
go back to reference Bae S-H, Nikolaev A, Seo JY, Castner J. Health care provider social network analysis: a systematic review. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:566–84.CrossRefPubMed Bae S-H, Nikolaev A, Seo JY, Castner J. Health care provider social network analysis: a systematic review. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63:566–84.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Benton DC, Perez-Raya F, Fernandez-Fernandez MP, Gonzalez-Jurado MA. A systematic review of nurse-related social network analysis studies. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62:321–39.CrossRefPubMed Benton DC, Perez-Raya F, Fernandez-Fernandez MP, Gonzalez-Jurado MA. A systematic review of nurse-related social network analysis studies. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62:321–39.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Braithwaite J. Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braithwaite J. Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Dunn AG, Westbrook JI. Interpreting social network metrics in healthcare organisations: a review and guide to validating small networks. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1064–8.CrossRefPubMed Dunn AG, Westbrook JI. Interpreting social network metrics in healthcare organisations: a review and guide to validating small networks. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1064–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O'Brien MA, Grimshaw J, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4. Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O'Brien MA, Grimshaw J, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD000125.​pub4.​
27.
go back to reference Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Mitchell JI, Long JC, Braithwaite J, Brodaty H. Social-professional networks in long-term care settings with people with dementia: an approach to better care? A systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.11.015. Mitchell JI, Long JC, Braithwaite J, Brodaty H. Social-professional networks in long-term care settings with people with dementia: an approach to better care? A systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamda.​2015.​11.​015.​
29.
go back to reference Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Christakis NA. Social networks and health: a systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;125:60–78.CrossRefPubMed Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Christakis NA. Social networks and health: a systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;125:60–78.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Clark J. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. Second ed. London: BMJ Books; 2003. p. 219–35. Clark J. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. Second ed. London: BMJ Books; 2003. p. 219–35.
38.
go back to reference Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2011 edition. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2011. Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2011 edition. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2011.
39.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The social care guidance manual. London: NICE; 2016. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The social care guidance manual. London: NICE; 2016.
42.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts HM, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews. Institute for Health Research. 2006; Popay J, Roberts HM, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews. Institute for Health Research. 2006;
43.
go back to reference Alexander GL, Steege LM, Pasupathy KS, Wise K. Case studies of IT sophistication in nursing homes: a mixed method approach to examine communication strategies about pressure ulcer prevention practices. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;49:156–66.CrossRef Alexander GL, Steege LM, Pasupathy KS, Wise K. Case studies of IT sophistication in nursing homes: a mixed method approach to examine communication strategies about pressure ulcer prevention practices. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;49:156–66.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Creswick N, Westbrook JI. Who do hospital physicians and nurses go to for advice about medications? A social network analysis and examination of prescribing error rates. Journal of Patient Safety. 2015;11:152–9.CrossRefPubMed Creswick N, Westbrook JI. Who do hospital physicians and nurses go to for advice about medications? A social network analysis and examination of prescribing error rates. Journal of Patient Safety. 2015;11:152–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Effken JA, Carley KM, Gephart S, Verran JA, Bianchi D, Reminga J, et al. Using ORA to explore the relationship of nursing unit communication to patient safety and quality outcomes. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:507–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Effken JA, Carley KM, Gephart S, Verran JA, Bianchi D, Reminga J, et al. Using ORA to explore the relationship of nursing unit communication to patient safety and quality outcomes. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:507–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Hossain L, Kit Guan DC. Modelling coordination in hospital emergency departments through social network analysis. Disasters. 2012;36:338–64.CrossRefPubMed Hossain L, Kit Guan DC. Modelling coordination in hospital emergency departments through social network analysis. Disasters. 2012;36:338–64.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Lindberg C, Downham G, Buscell P, Jones E, Peterson P, Krebs V. Embracing collaboration: a novel strategy for reducing bloodstream infections in outpatient hemodialysis centers. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:513–9.CrossRefPubMed Lindberg C, Downham G, Buscell P, Jones E, Peterson P, Krebs V. Embracing collaboration: a novel strategy for reducing bloodstream infections in outpatient hemodialysis centers. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:513–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Mundt MP, Zakletskaia LI, Shoham DA, Tuan WJ, Carayon P. Together achieving more: primary care team communication and alcohol-related healthcare utilization and costs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39:2003-2015.CrossRefPubMedCentral Mundt MP, Zakletskaia LI, Shoham DA, Tuan WJ, Carayon P. Together achieving more: primary care team communication and alcohol-related healthcare utilization and costs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39:2003-2015.CrossRefPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies. 2002; Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies. 2002;
50.
go back to reference Carley K. ORA. Pittsburgh: Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), Institute for Software Research Interational, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. 2001. Carley K. ORA. Pittsburgh: Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), Institute for Software Research Interational, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. 2001.
51.
go back to reference Valente TW. Social networks and health: models, methods and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.CrossRef Valente TW. Social networks and health: models, methods and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: a systematic review
Authors
Kate Sabot
Deepthi Wickremasinghe
Karl Blanchet
Bilal Avan
Joanna Schellenberg
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0597-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue