Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Intensive Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Nosocomial Infection | Research

Etoposide treatment in secondary hemophagocytic syndrome: impact on healthcare-associated infections and survival

Authors: Thibault Dupont, Michael Darmon, Eric Mariotte, Virginie Lemiale, Jehane Fadlallah, Adrien Mirouse, Lara Zafrani, Elie Azoulay, Sandrine Valade

Published in: Annals of Intensive Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Etoposide remains the cornerstone of symptomatic management of critically ill patients with secondary hemophagocytic syndrome (sHS). Risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in this setting with etoposide has never been assessed. We sought to evaluate the association between etoposide administration, HAIs occurrence and survival in critically ill adult patients with sHS. In this retrospective single-center study conducted in a university hospital ICU between January 2007 and March 2020, all consecutive patients with sHS were included. HAIs were defined as any microbiologically documented infection throughout ICU stay. Competing risk survival analysis was performed to determine factors associated with HAIs. Propensity score-based overlap weighting was performed to adjust for factors associated with etoposide use.

Results

168 patients with a median age of 49 [38, 59] were included. Forty-three (25.6%) patients presented with at least 1 microbiologically documented HAI throughout ICU stay. After adjustment, cumulative incidence of HAI was higher in patients receiving etoposide (p = 0.007), while survival was unaffected by etoposide status (p = 0.824). By multivariable analysis, etoposide treatment was associated with a higher incidence of HAIs (sHR 3.75 [1.05, 6.67]), whereas no association with survival (sHR 0.53 [0.20, 1.98]) was found. Other factors associated with increased mortality after adjustment included age, immunodepression, male sex, SOFA score > 13, and occurrence of HAI.

Conclusions

In patients with sHS, etoposide treatment is independently associated with increased occurrence of HAIs, whereas no association with survival was found. Intensivists should be aware of increased infectious risk, to promptly detect and treat infections in this specific setting. Studies to assess benefits from prophylactic anti-infectious agents in this setting are warranted and the lack of benefit of etoposide on survival needs to be interpreted cautiously.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
15.
go back to reference European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2017. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2017.
20.
go back to reference Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16(3):1141–54.CrossRef Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16(3):1141–54.CrossRef
25.
Metadata
Title
Etoposide treatment in secondary hemophagocytic syndrome: impact on healthcare-associated infections and survival
Authors
Thibault Dupont
Michael Darmon
Eric Mariotte
Virginie Lemiale
Jehane Fadlallah
Adrien Mirouse
Lara Zafrani
Elie Azoulay
Sandrine Valade
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2110-5820
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01075-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Annals of Intensive Care 1/2022 Go to the issue