Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Integrative article

Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal

Authors: Gabriel Catan, Rita Espanha, Rita Veloso Mendes, Orly Toren, David Chinitz

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in health systems is increasing worldwide. While it is assumed that ICT holds great potential to make health services more efficient and grant patients more empowerment, research on these trends is at an early stage. Building on a study of the impact of ICT on physicians and patients in Israel, a Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM) sponsored by COST Net in conjunction with CIES/ISCTE IUL (Portugal) facilitated a comparison of ICT in health in Israel and Portugal. The comparison focused on patient empowerment, physician behavior and the role of government in implementing ICT.
The research in both countries was qualitative in nature. In-depth interviews with the Ministry of Health (MOH), the private sector, patients associations, health plans and researchers were used to collect data. Purposeful sampling was used to select respondents, and secondary sources were used for triangulation.
The findings indicate that respondents in both countries feel that patient empowerment has indeed been furthered by introduction of ICT. Regarding physicians, in both countries ICT is seen as providing more information that can be used in medical decision making. Increased access of patients to web-based medical information can strengthen the role of patients in decision making and improve the physician-patient relationship, but also shift the latter in ways that may require adjustments in physician orientation. Physician uptake of ICT in both countries involves overcoming certain barriers, such as resistance to change. At the national level, important differences were found between the two countries. While in Israel, ICT was promoted and adopted by the meso level of the health system, in particular the health plans and government intervention can be found in a later stage, in Portugal the government was the main developer and national strategies were built from the beginning. These two approaches present different advantages and disadvantages. Government involvement in earlier stages could provide benefit in terms of interoperability of systems between different healthcare organizations. However, innovation could be slowed down due to government bureaucracy or lack of leadership.
The work provides information in order to understand and improve ICT services. Additionally, it provides input regarding impact of ICT on the physician/patient relationship and national policies in the area.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ITU. “The world in 2014: Facts and Figures”. International Telecommunications Union; 2014 [http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2014-e.pdf] (Accessed on 19/03/2015) ITU. “The world in 2014: Facts and Figures”. International Telecommunications Union; 2014 [http://​www.​itu.​int/​en/​ITU-D/​Statistics/​Documents/​facts/​ICTFactsFigures2​014-e.​pdf] (Accessed on 19/03/2015)
2.
go back to reference IOM. “Crossing the Quality Chasm-a New Health System for the 21th Century”. Washington: National Academy Press; 2008. IOM. “Crossing the Quality Chasm-a New Health System for the 21th Century”. Washington: National Academy Press; 2008.
3.
go back to reference WHO. “Towards the development of a mHealth strategy: A literature review”. Columbia University: World Health Organization & the Earth Institute; 2009. WHO. “Towards the development of a mHealth strategy: A literature review”. Columbia University: World Health Organization & the Earth Institute; 2009.
4.
go back to reference Mendes RV. “O Papel das Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação no sector (da reforma) da saúde em Portugal”. Lisbon: CIES/ISCTE-IUL; 2012. Mendes RV. “O Papel das Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação no sector (da reforma) da saúde em Portugal”. Lisbon: CIES/ISCTE-IUL; 2012.
5.
go back to reference NIHP. “The Health System in the Digital Age”. 11° Dead Sea Conference, 27–26 May 2010.. The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research; Israel; 2010. (In Hebrew) NIHP. “The Health System in the Digital Age”. 11° Dead Sea Conference, 27–26 May 2010.. The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research; Israel; 2010. (In Hebrew)
6.
go back to reference Hsiao C-J, Hing E. “Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2013”. NCHS data brief, no 143. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, United States; 2014. Hsiao C-J, Hing E. “Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2013”. NCHS data brief, no 143. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, United States; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Catan G. “Towards an eHealth Policy: A descriptive and analytical study of the utilization of Information & Communication Technology in the Israeli Community health care delivery system”. Thesis work for the Master in Public Health. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2013. Catan G. “Towards an eHealth Policy: A descriptive and analytical study of the utilization of Information & Communication Technology in the Israeli Community health care delivery system”. Thesis work for the Master in Public Health. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Ash N, Gamzu R. “Working Meeting of the OECD on the topic of comparative measures in the adoption of information and communication technologies and their application in the health system”. HaRefua. 2012;15:151. In Hebrew. Ash N, Gamzu R. “Working Meeting of the OECD on the topic of comparative measures in the adoption of information and communication technologies and their application in the health system”. HaRefua. 2012;15:151. In Hebrew.
9.
go back to reference Barros PP, Machado SR, Almeida SJ. “Health Systems in Transition: Portugal”. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems; 2011. Barros PP, Machado SR, Almeida SJ. “Health Systems in Transition: Portugal”. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems; 2011.
10.
go back to reference Rocha Á. “Health Informatics in Europe-The Portuguese Case”. CSREA EE. 2009;261:264. Rocha Á. “Health Informatics in Europe-The Portuguese Case”. CSREA EE. 2009;261:264.
11.
go back to reference Gomes P, Lapão LV. The role of a nation-wide information system in improving the access to surgery in Portugal”. MIE. 2009;71:75. Gomes P, Lapão LV. The role of a nation-wide information system in improving the access to surgery in Portugal”. MIE. 2009;71:75.
12.
go back to reference IUTICH. IUTICH-“Inquérito à Utilização de Tecnologias da Informação e da Comunicação nos Hospitais”. Portugal: Instituto Nacional de Estatística; 2014. IUTICH. IUTICH-“Inquérito à Utilização de Tecnologias da Informação e da Comunicação nos Hospitais”. Portugal: Instituto Nacional de Estatística; 2014.
13.
go back to reference Kaye R, Kukia E, Shalev V, Idar D, Chinitz D. Barriers and success factors in Health Information Technology: a Practitioner’s Perspective. J Manag Market Health Care. 2010;3(2):163–75.CrossRef Kaye R, Kukia E, Shalev V, Idar D, Chinitz D. Barriers and success factors in Health Information Technology: a Practitioner’s Perspective. J Manag Market Health Care. 2010;3(2):163–75.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Catan G, Espanha R, Veloso Mendes R, Toren O, Chinitz D. “The Impact of eHealth and mHealth on doctor behavior and patient involvement: an Israeli and Portuguese comparative approach”. In “Digital Healthcare Empowering Europeans”, In R. Cornet et al. (Eds.) – MIE 2015 Conference Proceedings, p. 813–817. European Federation for Medical Informatics; 2015 Catan G, Espanha R, Veloso Mendes R, Toren O, Chinitz D. “The Impact of eHealth and mHealth on doctor behavior and patient involvement: an Israeli and Portuguese comparative approach”. In “Digital Healthcare Empowering Europeans”, In R. Cornet et al. (Eds.) – MIE 2015 Conference Proceedings, p. 813–817. European Federation for Medical Informatics; 2015
15.
go back to reference Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. “Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. “Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
16.
go back to reference Groenewald T. “A phenomenological research design illustrated”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Article 4; 2004. (Accessed on 24/07/2013) [http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_1/pdf/groenewald.pdf] Groenewald T. “A phenomenological research design illustrated”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Article 4; 2004. (Accessed on 24/07/2013) [http://​www.​ualberta.​ca/​~iiqm/​backissues/​3_​1/​pdf/​groenewald.​pdf]
17.
go back to reference Stauss A, Korbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1998. Stauss A, Korbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1998.
18.
go back to reference Espanha R, Veloso Mendes R, Brito Fonseca R, Correia T. “Os portugueses, a saúde e a Internet”. Lisbon, Portugal: CIES-IUL; 2012. Espanha R, Veloso Mendes R, Brito Fonseca R, Correia T. “Os portugueses, a saúde e a Internet”. Lisbon, Portugal: CIES-IUL; 2012.
19.
go back to reference IAPO. What is Patient-Centered Healthcare? A Review of definitions and principles”. United Kingdom: International Alliance of Patient’s Organizations; 2007. IAPO. What is Patient-Centered Healthcare? A Review of definitions and principles”. United Kingdom: International Alliance of Patient’s Organizations; 2007.
20.
go back to reference WHO. “Health Promotion Glossary”. Genève: World Health Organization; 1998. WHO. “Health Promotion Glossary”. Genève: World Health Organization; 1998.
21.
go back to reference WHO. “Guidance on Engaging Patients and Patient Organizations in Hand Hygiene Initiatives”. World Health Organization; 2009 (Accessed on 25/01/2011) http://www.who.int/entity/gpsc/5may/Guidance_Organizations.doc WHO. “Guidance on Engaging Patients and Patient Organizations in Hand Hygiene Initiatives”. World Health Organization; 2009 (Accessed on 25/01/2011) http://​www.​who.​int/​entity/​gpsc/​5may/​Guidance_​Organizations.​doc
22.
go back to reference Kleine D. “ICT4 What? – Using the Choice Framework to operationalize the Capability Approach to Development”. IEEE/ACM ICTD, No 86; 2009. [http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/kleine/ICTD2009_KLEINE.pdf] Kleine D. “ICT4 What? – Using the Choice Framework to operationalize the Capability Approach to Development”. IEEE/ACM ICTD, No 86; 2009. [http://​www.​gg.​rhul.​ac.​uk/​kleine/​ICTD2009_​KLEINE.​pdf]
23.
go back to reference McAlearney AS, Chisolm DJ, Schweikhart S, Medow MA, Kelleher K. The story behind the story: physician skepticism about relying on clinical information technologies to reduce medical errors. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:836–42.CrossRefPubMed McAlearney AS, Chisolm DJ, Schweikhart S, Medow MA, Kelleher K. The story behind the story: physician skepticism about relying on clinical information technologies to reduce medical errors. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:836–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Espanha R. “Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação na Saúde”, in Jorge Simões (coord.), 30 anos do Serviço Nacional de Saúde-Um percurso comentado. Coimbra: Almedinañ; 2010. Espanha R. “Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação na Saúde”, in Jorge Simões (coord.), 30 anos do Serviço Nacional de Saúde-Um percurso comentado. Coimbra: Almedinañ; 2010.
25.
go back to reference Espanha R. “Saude e Comunicacao numa Sociedade em Rede – o caso portugués”. Portugal: Lisboa; 2009. Espanha R. “Saude e Comunicacao numa Sociedade em Rede – o caso portugués”. Portugal: Lisboa; 2009.
26.
go back to reference da Costa Pereira A, Giest S, Dumortier J, Artmann J. “Country Brief: Portugal”, eHealth Strategies. Bonn, Brussels: European Commission; 2010. da Costa Pereira A, Giest S, Dumortier J, Artmann J. “Country Brief: Portugal”, eHealth Strategies. Bonn, Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
27.
go back to reference WHO. “Atlas eHealth country profiles: based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth”, Global Observatory for eHealth Series 1. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2010. WHO. “Atlas eHealth country profiles: based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth”, Global Observatory for eHealth Series 1. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Health information technology implementation - impacts and policy considerations: a comparison between Israel and Portugal
Authors
Gabriel Catan
Rita Espanha
Rita Veloso Mendes
Orly Toren
David Chinitz
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0040-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015 Go to the issue