Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original research article

Challenges of the Pandemic Response in Primary Care during Pre-Vaccination Period: A Qualitative Study

Authors: Marina Kunin, Dan Engelhard, Shane Thomas, Mark Ashworth, Leon Piterman

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

During the 2009/A/H1N1 pandemic, the main burden of the patient management fell on primary care physicians (PCPs), and they were the principal implementers of pandemic policies. Broad involvement of PCPs in the pandemic response offered an excellent opportunity to investigate the challenges that they encountered.

Objective

To examine challenges faced by PCPs as they implemented pandemic policies in Australia, Israel and England before the 2009/A/H1N1 pandemic vaccine became available.

Methods

This is a qualitative descriptive study that employed in-depth semi-structured interviews with 65 PCPs from Australia, Israel and England. The data were analysed thematically to provide a detailed account of the themes.

Results

Challenges in three fields of the pandemic response were identified. (i) Consultation of patients was challenged by the high flow of patients, sick and worried-well, the necessity to provide personalised information about the disease during consultations, and unfamiliar antiviral treatment. (ii) Performance of public health responsibilities was complicated in regards to patient segregation and introduction of personal protection measures. (iii) Communication with the health authorities was inefficient, with no established route to provide feedback about the pandemic policies.

Conclusions

The experience of the 2009/A/H1N1 pandemic highlighted the centrality of primary care in the pandemic response. Despite intensive pre-pandemic planning, numerous barriers for implementation of the pandemic policies in primary care were identified. Investigation of three different approaches for involvement of PCPs in the pandemic management showed that none of these approaches worked smoothly.
Literature
1.
Eizenberg P. The general practice experience of the swine flu epidemic in Victoria - Lessons from the front line. Med J Aust. 2009;191(3):151–3.PubMed
2.
3.
Boyle S. United Kingdom (England): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011;13:1–486.PubMed
4.
Healy J, Sharman E, Lokuge B. Australia: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2006;8:1–158.
5.
Rosen B, Merkur S. Israel: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2009;11:1–226.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Kunin M, Engelhard D, Thomas S, Ashworth M, Piterman L. Influenza pandemic 2009/A/H1N1 management policies in primary care: A comparative analysis of three countries. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37(3):291–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Minichiello V. In-depth interviewing: researching people. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire; 1990.
13.
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1990.
14.
Liamputtong RP, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press; 1999.
15.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
16.
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40.CrossRef
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Uijen AA, van de Lisdonk EH. Multimorbidity in primary care: Prevalence and trend over the last 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(s1):28–32.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Østbye T, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):209–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
Bocquet J, Winzenberg T, Shaw KA. Epicentre of influenza: the primary care experience in Melbourne, Victoria. Aust Fam Physician. 2010;39(5):313–6.PubMed
24.
Shaw KA, Chilcott A, Hansen E, Winzenberg T. The GP’s response to pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2006;23(3):267–72.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Anikeeva O, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Street JM. How will Australian general practitioners respond to an influenza pandemic? A qualitative study of ethical values. Med J Aust. 2008;189(3):148–50.PubMed
26.
Tan N, Goh L, Lee S. Family physicians’ experiences, behaviour, and use of personal protection equipment During the SARS outbreak in Singapore: do they fit the becker health belief model? Asia Pac J Public Health. 2006;18(3):49–56.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Verma S, Mythily S, Chan YH, Deslypere JP, Teo EK, Chong SA. Post-SARS psychological morbidity and stigma among general practitioners and traditional Chinese medicine practitioners in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004;33(6):743–8.PubMed
28.
Herceg A, Geysen A, Guest C, Bialkowski R. SARS and biothreat preparedness–a survey of ACT general practitioners. Commun Dis Intell. 2005;29(3):277–82.
29.
30.
Weeramanthri TS, Robertson AG, Dowse GK, Effler PV, Leclercq MG, Burtenshaw JD, et al. Response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza in Australia – lessons from a State health department perspective. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34(4):477–86.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Jackson C, Mangtani P, Vynnycky E, Fielding K, Kitching A, Mohamed H, et al. School closures and student contact patterns. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(2):245–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Hippisley-Cox J, Vinogradova Y. Trends in Consultation Rates in General Practice 1995 to 2008: Analysis of the QResearch® database. Final Report to the NHS Information Centre and Department of Health. NHS; 2009.
34.
35.
36.
Smith S, Smith GE, Olowokure B, Ibbotson S, Foord D, Maguire H, et al. Early spread of the 2009 infuenza A(H1N1) pandemic in the United Kingdom - use of local syndromic data, May-August 2009. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16(3):8–16.
37.
38.
Caley M, Sidhu K, Shukla R. GPs’ opinions on the NHS and HPA response to the first wave of the influenza A/H1N1v pandemic. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(573):283–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
39.
Mann C, Wood D, Davies P. An evaluation of the UK National Pandemic Flu Service swine flu algorithm in hospitalised children, and comparison with the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence fever guideline. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(9):761–3.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Goodwin R, Gaines Jr SO, Myers L, Neto F. Initial psychological responses to swine flu. Int J Behav Med. 2011;18(2):88–92.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Rubin GJ, Potts HWW, Michie S. The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A HINIv) on public responses to the outbreak: Results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(34):183–266.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Engelhard D, Bromberg M, Averbuch D, Tenenbaum A, Goldmann D, Kunin M, et al. Increased Burden and Risk Factors of Pediatric 2009 A(H1N1) Pandemic versus Seasonal Influenza in Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(9):1740–3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
43.
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–65.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Revere D, Nelson K, Thiede H, Duchin J, Stergachis A, Baseman J. Public health emergency preparedness and response communications with health care providers: a literature review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:337.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
45.
Wong WC, Wong SY, Lee A, Goggins WB. How to provide an effective primary health care in fighting against severe acute respiratory syndrome: the experiences of two cities. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(1):50–5.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Seale H, Leask J, Po K, MacIntyre C. “Will they just pack up and leave?” – attitudes and intended behaviour of hospital health care workers during an influenza pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):1–8.CrossRef
47.
Lynch MM, Mitchell EW, Williams JL, Brumbaugh K, Jones-Bell M, Pinkney DE, et al. Pregnant and recently pregnant women’s perceptions about influenza a pandemic (H1N1) 2009: Implications for public health and provider communication. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(8):1657–64.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Challenges of the Pandemic Response in Primary Care during Pre-Vaccination Period: A Qualitative Study
Authors
Marina Kunin
Dan Engelhard
Shane Thomas
Mark Ashworth
Leon Piterman
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0028-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015 Go to the issue

Integrative article

The evolution of the emergency mental health system in Israel - from the 1980’s until today

Commentary

Observations and recommendations on the investigation of clinical decision-making and usage involving electrophysical agents

Commentary

Role of primary care providers in a pandemic – conflicting views and future opportunities

Original research article

Differences in characteristics of pediatric patients undergoing computed tomography between hospitals and primary care settings: implications for assessing cancer follow-up studies

Original research article

Better together: a community- hospital integrative model of healthcare as a practical solution for providing excellence in endocrinology care in an era of limited resources

Commentary

Inequalities in waiting times by socioeconomic status – a possible causal mechanism