Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Periprosthetic Fracture | Educational Review

Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review

Authors: Damien Combes, Romain Lancigu, Patrick Desbordes de Cepoy, Filippo Caporilli-Razza, Laurent Hubert, Louis Rony, Christophe Aubé

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Currently, an increasing number of patients benefit from shoulder prosthesis implantation. Radiologists are therefore more often confronted with imaging examinations involving shoulder arthroplasty, whether during a dedicated examination or incidentally. Standard radiography is the first-line imaging modality in the follow-up of these implants, before the possible use of cross-sectional imaging modalities (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound, or nuclear medicine examinations. Shoulder arthroplasties are divided into three categories: reverse shoulder arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and partial shoulder joint replacement (including humeral hemiarthroplasty and humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty). Each of these prostheses can present complications, either shared by all types of arthroplasty or specific to each. Infection, periprosthetic fractures, humeral component loosening, heterotopic ossification, implant failure, and nerve injury can affect all types of prostheses. Instability, scapular notching, and acromial fractures can be identified after reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantation. Glenoid component loosening and rotator cuff tear are specific complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. Progressive wear of the native glenoid is the only specific complication observed in partial shoulder joint replacement. Knowledge of different types of shoulder prostheses and their complications’ radiological signs is crucial for the radiologist to initiate prompt and adequate management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lugli T (1978) Artificial shoulder joint by Péan (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res:215–218 Lugli T (1978) Artificial shoulder joint by Péan (1893): the facts of an exceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res:215–218
2.
go back to reference Bankes MJ, Emery RJ (1995) Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jules Emile Péan. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:259–262CrossRef Bankes MJ, Emery RJ (1995) Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jules Emile Péan. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:259–262CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pottinger P, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB et al (2012) Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2075–2083 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00861 CrossRef Pottinger P, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB et al (2012) Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2075–2083 https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​00861 CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP, Parks PF Jr, Homra L, Kaye JJ (1988) Detection of occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using sequential technetium-99 m HDP bone scintigraphy and indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med 29:1347–1353 Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP, Parks PF Jr, Homra L, Kaye JJ (1988) Detection of occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using sequential technetium-99 m HDP bone scintigraphy and indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med 29:1347–1353
26.
go back to reference Sperling JW, Kozak TK, Hanssen AD, Cofield RH (2001) Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (382):206–216CrossRef Sperling JW, Kozak TK, Hanssen AD, Cofield RH (2001) Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (382):206–216CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wright TW, Cofield RH (1995) Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1340–1346CrossRef Wright TW, Cofield RH (1995) Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1340–1346CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sperling JW, Cofield RH, O'Driscoll SW, Torchia ME, Rowland CM (2000) Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:507–513CrossRef Sperling JW, Cofield RH, O'Driscoll SW, Torchia ME, Rowland CM (2000) Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:507–513CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Uschok S, Magosch P, Moe M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2017) Is the stemless humeral head replacement clinically and radiographically a secure equivalent to standard stem humeral head replacement in the long-term follow-up? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:225–232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.001 CrossRef Uschok S, Magosch P, Moe M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2017) Is the stemless humeral head replacement clinically and radiographically a secure equivalent to standard stem humeral head replacement in the long-term follow-up? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:225–232 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2016.​09.​001 CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Heuberer PR, Brandl G, Pauzenberger L, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Anderl W (2018) Radiological changes do not influence clinical mid-term outcome in stemless humeral head replacements with hollow screw fixation: a prospective radiological and clinical evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1945-6 Heuberer PR, Brandl G, Pauzenberger L, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Anderl W (2018) Radiological changes do not influence clinical mid-term outcome in stemless humeral head replacements with hollow screw fixation: a prospective radiological and clinical evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:28 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12891-018-1945-6
35.
go back to reference Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Frich LH, Søjbjerg JO, Sneppen O (1989) Heterotopic bone formation following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:99–104CrossRef Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Frich LH, Søjbjerg JO, Sneppen O (1989) Heterotopic bone formation following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:99–104CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2000) Heterotopic ossification after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:179–182CrossRef Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2000) Heterotopic ossification after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:179–182CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Dare D, Dines JS, Tebo C, Edwards TB, Craig EV, Dines DM (2016) Scapular notching. Instr Course Lect 65:145–156 Dare D, Dines JS, Tebo C, Edwards TB, Craig EV, Dines DM (2016) Scapular notching. Instr Course Lect 65:145–156
46.
go back to reference Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen FA 3rd (1988) Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplasty 3:39–46CrossRef Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen FA 3rd (1988) Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplasty 3:39–46CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Molé D, Roche O, Riand N, Levigne C, Walch G (1999) Cemented glenoid components: results in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 163–171CrossRef Molé D, Roche O, Riand N, Levigne C, Walch G (1999) Cemented glenoid components: results in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 163–171CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review
Authors
Damien Combes
Romain Lancigu
Patrick Desbordes de Cepoy
Filippo Caporilli-Razza
Laurent Hubert
Louis Rony
Christophe Aubé
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0788-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Insights into Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue