Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Ultrasound Journal 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original article

The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound

Authors: Scott J. Millington, Robert T. Arntfield, Robert Jie Guo, Seth Koenig, Pierre Kory, Vicki Noble, Haney Mallemat, Jordan R. Schoenherr

Published in: The Ultrasound Journal | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The rapid adoption of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has created a need to develop assessment tools to ensure that learners can competently use these technologies. In this study, the authors developed and tested a rating scale to assess the quality of point-of-care thoracic ultrasound studies performed by novices. In Phase 1, the Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale was developed based on structured interviews with subject matter experts. The tool was then piloted on a small series of ultrasound studies in Phase 2. In Phase 3 the tool was applied to a sample of 150 POCUS studies performed by ten learners; performance was then assessed by two independent raters.

Results

Evidence for the content validity of the ACTS scale was provided by a consensus exercise wherein experts agreed on the general principles and specific items that make up the scale. The tool demonstrated reasonable inter-rater reliability despite minimal requirements for evaluator training and displayed evidence of good internal structure, with related scale items correlating well with each other. Analysis of the aggregate learning curves suggested a rapid early improvement in learner performance with slower improvement after approximately 25–30 studies.

Conclusions

The ACTS scale provides a straightforward means to assess learner performance. Our results support the conclusion that the tool is an effective means of making valid judgments regarding competency in point-of-care thoracic ultrasound, and that the majority of learner improvement occurs during their first 25–30 practice studies.
Footnotes
1
The more parameters that are included in a model, the more likely it will fit the data. Models with fewer parameters are therefore preferred on the grounds of parsimony.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Plummer D, Brunette D, Asinger R, Ruiz E (1992) Emergency department echocardiography improves outcome in penetrating cardiac injury. Ann Emerg Med 21(6):709–712CrossRefPubMed Plummer D, Brunette D, Asinger R, Ruiz E (1992) Emergency department echocardiography improves outcome in penetrating cardiac injury. Ann Emerg Med 21(6):709–712CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McGee DC, Gould MK (2003) Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133CrossRefPubMed McGee DC, Gould MK (2003) Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A (1999) The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 25(4):383–388CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A (1999) The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 25(4):383–388CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mayo P (2009) American College of Chest Physicians/La Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 135:1050–1060CrossRefPubMed Mayo P (2009) American College of Chest Physicians/La Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 135:1050–1060CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Quintard H, Philip I, Ichai C (2011) French survey on current use of ultrasound in the critical care unit: ECHOREA. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 30(11):e69–e73CrossRefPubMed Quintard H, Philip I, Ichai C (2011) French survey on current use of ultrasound in the critical care unit: ECHOREA. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 30(11):e69–e73CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Volpicelli G (2013) Lung sonography. Journal of ultrasound medicine 32:165–171CrossRef Volpicelli G (2013) Lung sonography. Journal of ultrasound medicine 32:165–171CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P (2008) Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P (2008) Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Millington SJ, Arntfield RT, Hewak M, Hamstra SJ, Beaulieu Y, Hibbert B, Koenig S, Kory P, Mayo P, Schoenherr JR (2016) The rapid assessment of competency in echocardiography scale. J Ultrasound Med 35(7):1457–1463CrossRefPubMed Millington SJ, Arntfield RT, Hewak M, Hamstra SJ, Beaulieu Y, Hibbert B, Koenig S, Kory P, Mayo P, Schoenherr JR (2016) The rapid assessment of competency in echocardiography scale. J Ultrasound Med 35(7):1457–1463CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Millington SJ, Hewak M, Arntfield RT, Beaulieu Y, Hibbert B, Koenig S, Kory P, Mayo P, Schoenherr JR (2017) Outcomes from extensive training in critical care echocardiography: identifying the optimal number of practice studies required to achieve competency. J Crit Care 40:99–102CrossRefPubMed Millington SJ, Hewak M, Arntfield RT, Beaulieu Y, Hibbert B, Koenig S, Kory P, Mayo P, Schoenherr JR (2017) Outcomes from extensive training in critical care echocardiography: identifying the optimal number of practice studies required to achieve competency. J Crit Care 40:99–102CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 30:116–127CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 30:116–127CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kane MT (1992) An argument-based approach to validity. Psychol Bull 112:527–535CrossRef Kane MT (1992) An argument-based approach to validity. Psychol Bull 112:527–535CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Messick S (1995) Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 50:741–749CrossRef Messick S (1995) Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 50:741–749CrossRef
13.
go back to reference American Educational Research Association (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC American Educational Research Association (1999) Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC
14.
go back to reference Volpicelli G et al (2012) International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38:577–591CrossRefPubMed Volpicelli G et al (2012) International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38:577–591CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick R, Szalay D (1998) Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 73:993–997CrossRefPubMed Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick R, Szalay D (1998) Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 73:993–997CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
Authors
Scott J. Millington
Robert T. Arntfield
Robert Jie Guo
Seth Koenig
Pierre Kory
Vicki Noble
Haney Mallemat
Jordan R. Schoenherr
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2524-8987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0081-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

The Ultrasound Journal 1/2017 Go to the issue