Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Letter

Veno–veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock

Authors: Hye Ju Yeo, Doosoo Jeon, Yun Seong Kim, Woo Hyun Cho, Dohyung Kim

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with refractory septic shock, isolated veno–venous (VV) or veno–arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may lead to differential hypoxia or inadequate tissue perfusion [1]. In this context, MacLaren et al. [2] showed that central ECMO improved the outcomes by guaranteeing systemic oxygenation without differential hypoxia. However, central ECMO has potential limitations due to its invasiveness and the lack of evidence in adult populations. Veno–veno–arterial (VVA) ECMO may offer effective oxygenation and hemodynamic support without differential hypoxia by regulating the return of oxygenated blood to the underperfused coronary and cerebral circulation [35]. Therefore, VVA mode can be an alternative treatment modality for ARDS patients with severe septic shock. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Avgerinos DV, DeBois W, Voevidko L, Salemi A. Regional variation in arterial saturation and oxygen delivery during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:183–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Avgerinos DV, DeBois W, Voevidko L, Salemi A. Regional variation in arterial saturation and oxygen delivery during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:183–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference MacLaren G, Butt W, Best D, Donath S. Central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:133–6.PubMedCrossRef MacLaren G, Butt W, Best D, Donath S. Central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:133–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shekar K, Mullany DV, Thomson B, Ziegenfuss M, Platts DG, Fraser JF. Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review. Crit Care. 2014;18:219.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shekar K, Mullany DV, Thomson B, Ziegenfuss M, Platts DG, Fraser JF. Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review. Crit Care. 2014;18:219.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ius F, Sommer W, Tudorache I, Avsar M, Siemeni T, Salman J, et al. Veno-veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure with severe haemodynamic impairment: technique and early outcomes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:761–7.PubMedCrossRef Ius F, Sommer W, Tudorache I, Avsar M, Siemeni T, Salman J, et al. Veno-veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure with severe haemodynamic impairment: technique and early outcomes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:761–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Umei N, Ichiba S, Ujike Y, Tsukahara K. Successful application of venoarterial-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the reversal of severe cardiorespiratory failure. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-209901.PubMed Umei N, Ichiba S, Ujike Y, Tsukahara K. Successful application of venoarterial-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the reversal of severe cardiorespiratory failure. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. doi:10.​1136/​bcr-2015-209901.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Veno–veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock
Authors
Hye Ju Yeo
Doosoo Jeon
Yun Seong Kim
Woo Hyun Cho
Dohyung Kim
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1205-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Critical Care 1/2016 Go to the issue