Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals

Authors: Kathleen L. Miller, Michael Lanthier

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Orphan Drug Act was enacted in 1983 to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases. Previous research has attempted to examine the impact of the Act by assessing either the number of orphan designations that have been granted or the number of new orphan drugs approved for marketing. This study provides a more in-depth understanding of the effect of the Orphan Drug Act by investigating all types of drug approvals with an orphan designation, along with multiple characteristics of the drugs, over the entire 35 years of the Act. These orphan approvals include: new molecular entities (new drugs approved first for a rare disease), secondary indications (an expansion from the first approved indication), and new formulations.

Results

The results show that the number of approvals for orphan indications has been increasing over time, and the upward trend is especially large in the most recent years. Much of this increase has been driven by the increase in secondary indications being approved for previously approved drugs, although there have also been increases in the number of approved new drugs. We also find that while oncology indications have been increasing significantly, there has also been an increase in other therapeutic areas. Additionally, we find that the proportion of biologic drugs being approved has increased over time. Lastly, while other parts of this drug landscape have dramatically altered over time, the proportion of orphan approvals receiving priority review has not changed.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the Orphan Drug Act appears to have stimulated significant drug development for rare diseases. Additionally, approvals of orphan indications have been increasing over time. This increasing effect has not targeted a single area of the rare disease space, rather, gains in approvals have been seen across: therapeutic areas, approval types (both new drugs and secondary indications), and for both biologics and small molecule drugs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Seoane-Vazquez E, et al. Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):33.CrossRef Seoane-Vazquez E, et al. Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3(1):33.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921.CrossRef Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US orphan drug act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy. 2010;95(2):216–28.CrossRef Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US orphan drug act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy. 2010;95(2):216–28.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Braun MM, et al. Emergence of orphan drugs in the United States: a quantitative assessment of the first 25 years. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(7):519–22.CrossRef Braun MM, et al. Emergence of orphan drugs in the United States: a quantitative assessment of the first 25 years. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(7):519–22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Haffner ME. Adopting orphan drugs—two dozen years of treating rare diseases. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(5):445–7.CrossRef Haffner ME. Adopting orphan drugs—two dozen years of treating rare diseases. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(5):445–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M. Two decades of orphan product development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(10):821–5.CrossRef Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M. Two decades of orphan product development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(10):821–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Melnikova I. Rare diseases and orphan drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:267–8.CrossRef Melnikova I. Rare diseases and orphan drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:267–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Monguio R, Spargo T, Seoane-Vazquez E. Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients’ health needs? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):1.CrossRef Rodriguez-Monguio R, Spargo T, Seoane-Vazquez E. Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients’ health needs? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):1.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller KL, Lanthier M. Trends in orphan new molecular entities, 1983–2014: half were first in class, and rare cancers were the most frequent target. Health Aff. 2016;35(3):464–70.CrossRef Miller KL, Lanthier M. Trends in orphan new molecular entities, 1983–2014: half were first in class, and rare cancers were the most frequent target. Health Aff. 2016;35(3):464–70.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology. Reimbursement for cancer treatment: coverage of off-label drug indications. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3206.CrossRef American Society of Clinical Oncology. Reimbursement for cancer treatment: coverage of off-label drug indications. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3206.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hernandez JJ, Pryszlak M, Smith L, Yanchus C, Kurji N, Shahani VM, Molinski SV. Giving drugs a second chance: overcoming regulatory and financial hurdles in repurposing approved drugs as cancer therapeutics. Front Oncol. 2017;7:273.CrossRef Hernandez JJ, Pryszlak M, Smith L, Yanchus C, Kurji N, Shahani VM, Molinski SV. Giving drugs a second chance: overcoming regulatory and financial hurdles in repurposing approved drugs as cancer therapeutics. Front Oncol. 2017;7:273.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(2):209–16.CrossRef DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(2):209–16.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eckhouse S, Lewison G, Sullivan R. Trends in the global funding and activity of cancer research. Mol Oncol. 2008;2(1):20–32.CrossRef Eckhouse S, Lewison G, Sullivan R. Trends in the global funding and activity of cancer research. Mol Oncol. 2008;2(1):20–32.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Investigating the landscape of US orphan product approvals
Authors
Kathleen L. Miller
Michael Lanthier
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0930-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018 Go to the issue