Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research

Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States

Authors: Enrique Seoane-Vazquez, Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio, Sheryl L Szeinbach, Jay Visaria

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Orphan Drug Act (1983) established several incentives to encourage the development of orphan drugs (ODs) to treat rare diseases and conditions. This study analyzed the characteristics of OD designations, approvals, sponsors, and evaluated the effective patent and market exclusivity life of orphan new molecular entities (NMEs) approved in the US between 1983 and 2007.

Methods

Primary data sources were the FDA Orange Book, the FDA Office of Orphan Drugs Development, and the US Patent and Trademark Office. Data included all orphan designations and approvals listed by the FDA and all NMEs approved by the FDA during the study period.

Results

The FDA listed 1,793 orphan designations and 322 approvals between 1983 and 2007. Cancer was the main group of diseases targeted for orphan approvals. Eighty-three companies concentrated 67.7% of the total orphan NMEs approvals. The average time from orphan designation to FDA approval was 4.0 ± 3.3 years (mean ± standard deviation). The average maximum effective patent and market exclusivity life was 11.7 ± 5.0 years for orphan NME. OD market exclusivity increased the average maximum effective patent and market exclusivity life of ODs by 0.8 years.

Conclusion

Public programs, federal regulations, and policies support orphan drugs R&D. Grants, research design support, FDA fee waivers, tax incentives, and orphan drug market exclusivity are the main incentives for orphan drug R&D. Although the 7-year orphan drug market exclusivity provision had a positive yet relatively modest overall effect on effective patent and market exclusivity life, economic incentives and public support mechanisms provide a platform for continued orphan drug development for a highly specialized market.
Literature
1.
go back to reference United States Food and Drug Administration: The Orphan Drug Regulations. Final rule, 57 FR 62076. 21 CFR Part 316. 1992 United States Food and Drug Administration: The Orphan Drug Regulations. Final rule, 57 FR 62076. 21 CFR Part 316. 1992
2.
6.
go back to reference Wastfelt M, Fadeel B, Henter J-I: A journey of hope: Lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2006, 260: 1-10. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01666.x.CrossRefPubMed Wastfelt M, Fadeel B, Henter J-I: A journey of hope: Lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2006, 260: 1-10. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01666.x.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference United States Food and Drug Administration: Information on the OOPD grant program. 2008, (Accessed January 3, 2008). United States Food and Drug Administration: Information on the OOPD grant program. 2008, (Accessed January 3, 2008).
8.
go back to reference Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M: Two decades of orphan drug development. Nature Rev Drug Discovery. 2002, 1: 821-5. 10.1038/nrd919.CrossRef Haffner ME, Whitley J, Moses M: Two decades of orphan drug development. Nature Rev Drug Discovery. 2002, 1: 821-5. 10.1038/nrd919.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rohde DD: The Orphan Drug Act: an engine of innovation? At what cost?. Food Drug Law J. 2000, 55 (1): 125-143.PubMed Rohde DD: The Orphan Drug Act: an engine of innovation? At what cost?. Food Drug Law J. 2000, 55 (1): 125-143.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Shulman SR, Manocchia M: The U.S. orphan drug program 1983–1995. PharmacoEconomics. 1997, 12: 312-26.CrossRefPubMed Shulman SR, Manocchia M: The U.S. orphan drug program 1983–1995. PharmacoEconomics. 1997, 12: 312-26.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Haffner ME: Adopting orphan drugs: Two dozen years of treating rare diseases. The New Eng J of Med. 2006, 354: 445-7. 10.1056/NEJMp058317.CrossRef Haffner ME: Adopting orphan drugs: Two dozen years of treating rare diseases. The New Eng J of Med. 2006, 354: 445-7. 10.1056/NEJMp058317.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Seoane-Vazquez E, Schondelmeyer S, Szeinbach SL: Drug patent life and generic entry: Analysis of the new molecular entities approved by the FDA between 1980 and 1999. J of Pharmaceutical Finance, Econ and Policy. 2008, 16: 67-85. Seoane-Vazquez E, Schondelmeyer S, Szeinbach SL: Drug patent life and generic entry: Analysis of the new molecular entities approved by the FDA between 1980 and 1999. J of Pharmaceutical Finance, Econ and Policy. 2008, 16: 67-85.
14.
go back to reference Yin W: Market incentives and pharmaceutical innovation. J of Health Econ. 2008, 27: 1060-1077. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.01.002.CrossRef Yin W: Market incentives and pharmaceutical innovation. J of Health Econ. 2008, 27: 1060-1077. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.01.002.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Finkel MJ: Orphan drugs development and some methods for maximizing the usefulness of research on rare diseases. Cooperative approaches to research and development of orphan drugs. Proceedings of a Conference held in April 9–10, 1984. Edited by: Van Woert MH, Chung E. 1985, New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc, 11-18. Finkel MJ: Orphan drugs development and some methods for maximizing the usefulness of research on rare diseases. Cooperative approaches to research and development of orphan drugs. Proceedings of a Conference held in April 9–10, 1984. Edited by: Van Woert MH, Chung E. 1985, New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc, 11-18.
17.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Ruby A, Cannon P: The economics of orphan drug policy in the U.S.: Can the legislation be improved?. PharmacoEconomics. 1995, 8: 374-84.CrossRefPubMed Peabody JW, Ruby A, Cannon P: The economics of orphan drug policy in the U.S.: Can the legislation be improved?. PharmacoEconomics. 1995, 8: 374-84.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference United States Congress: House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. Preliminary report of the survey on drugs for rare diseases. Prepared for the subcommittee on health and the environment, committee on energy and commerce. 1982, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office United States Congress: House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. Preliminary report of the survey on drugs for rare diseases. Prepared for the subcommittee on health and the environment, committee on energy and commerce. 1982, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office
20.
go back to reference Haffner ME, Kelsey JV: Evaluation of orphan drugs by the U.S. food and drug administration. International J of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1992, 8: 647-57.CrossRef Haffner ME, Kelsey JV: Evaluation of orphan drugs by the U.S. food and drug administration. International J of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1992, 8: 647-57.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Catlin A, Cowan C, Hartman M, Heffler S: National Health Spending In 2006: A Year Of Change For Prescription Drugs. Health Aff. 2008, 27 (1): 14-29. 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.14.CrossRef Catlin A, Cowan C, Hartman M, Heffler S: National Health Spending In 2006: A Year Of Change For Prescription Drugs. Health Aff. 2008, 27 (1): 14-29. 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.14.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stucki JC: The development of orphan drugs: A pharmaceutical company perspective. Cooperative approaches to research and development of orphan drugs. Proceedings of a Conference held in April 9–10, 1984. Edited by: Van Woert MH, Chung E. 1985, New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc, 95-104. Stucki JC: The development of orphan drugs: A pharmaceutical company perspective. Cooperative approaches to research and development of orphan drugs. Proceedings of a Conference held in April 9–10, 1984. Edited by: Van Woert MH, Chung E. 1985, New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc, 95-104.
23.
go back to reference Reaves ND: A model of effective health policy: The 1983 orphan drug act. J of Health & Soc Pol. 2003, 17: 61-71. 10.1300/J045v17n04_04.CrossRef Reaves ND: A model of effective health policy: The 1983 orphan drug act. J of Health & Soc Pol. 2003, 17: 61-71. 10.1300/J045v17n04_04.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Finkel MJ: The development of orphan drugs. The New Eng J of Med. 1982, 307: 963-4.CrossRef Finkel MJ: The development of orphan drugs. The New Eng J of Med. 1982, 307: 963-4.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference DiMasi JA: Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 209-216. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803.CrossRefPubMed DiMasi JA: Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 209-216. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Clissold DB: Prescription for the orphan drug act: The impact of the FDA's 1992 regulations and the latest congressional proposals for reform. Food Drug Law J. 1995, 50 (1): 125-47.PubMed Clissold DB: Prescription for the orphan drug act: The impact of the FDA's 1992 regulations and the latest congressional proposals for reform. Food Drug Law J. 1995, 50 (1): 125-47.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States
Authors
Enrique Seoane-Vazquez
Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio
Sheryl L Szeinbach
Jay Visaria
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-3-33

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2008 Go to the issue